Is studente wat in 'n uitkomsgerigte onderrigbenadering opgelei is, gereed vir universiteitswiskunde? : navorsings- en oorsigartikel

J. Engelbrecht, Ansie Harding, Patrick Phiri
{"title":"Is studente wat in 'n uitkomsgerigte onderrigbenadering opgelei is, gereed vir universiteitswiskunde? : navorsings- en oorsigartikel","authors":"J. Engelbrecht, Ansie Harding, Patrick Phiri","doi":"10.4102/satnt.v28i4.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uitkomsgerigte onderrig (UGO) het 'n groei- en hersieningsfase beleef en is vir die afsienbare toekoms hier om te bly. Die 2009-inname van studente op universiteit is die eerste matrikulante wat slegs binne die nuwe bedeling onderrig ontvang het. Hierdie matrikulante se graad 12-uitslae is deur onnatuurlik hoe punte in wiskunde gekenmerk. Die vraag wat gevra word, is hoe die 2009-inname van studente in wiskunde op universiteit vaar wat prestasie, algemene vaardighede, wiskundige vaardighede en inhoudverwante vaardighede betref. Dit blyk dat alhoewel hierdie studente beter toegerus is wat persoonlike eienskappe soos selfvertroue betref, hulle in baie gevalle swakker daaraan toe is wat wiskundige en inhoudverwante vaardighede betref. Voorstelle word gemaak om die oorgang van sekondere na tersiere wiskunde gladder te maak.\nAre students who have been educated in an outcomes-based approach prepared for university mathematics?\nFollowing the political changes of 1994 in South Africa, the decision was taken to replace the traditional skills-based education system at primary and secondary school level (Grades 1 - 12) with an outcomes-based education system (OBE). The OBE approach, referred to as Curriculum 2005, was introduced into schools in 1998. The implementation of the OBE system did not occur without problems, giving rise to revised initiatives and a fair amount of criticism. The 2009 intake of students at universities is the first group of students that had been subjected to the OBE approach for their entire school career. This is also the first group of students for whom some form of mathematics was compulsory up to Grade 12 level in the form of mathematics or mathematical literacy. These students were characterised by the fact that their mathematics marks for Grade 12 were exceptionally high and that many more students qualified for university entrance.\nThis article reports on the impact of this new education system on the mathematics preparedness of students entering university. The study involves an empirical analysis of the students in the first-year mathematics course for engineering students at the University of Pretoria as well as an analysis of a questionnaire completed by experienced lecturers at this university.\nThe question addressed in this article is how the 2009 intake of students cope with mathematics at university level with regard to\nPerformance\nGeneral attributes\nMathematical attributes\nContent-related attributes\nResults indicate a decrease in mathematics performance of these students at university level and that the inflated matric marks result in unjustified expectations. However, it is not unusual for marks to decrease from school to university and there is still too little evidence for serious concern.\nThe study also indicates that these students seem to be better equipped with regard to personal attributes such as self-confidence and the will to work. However, in many instances, their general mathematical attributes such as algebraic manipulation skills and their general mastery of mathematical writing are worse than those of students in the past. There are also areas where their content knowledge is either lacking or unexpectedly shallow. It therefore appears that these students have improved personal attributes but not necessarily the knowledge and mathematical skills to back them up.\nSome recommendations are made with regard to handling the situation. It is clear that the new school system necessitates changes at school level with a view to university level in order to ensure a transition that is surmountable.","PeriodicalId":30428,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/satnt.v28i4.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Uitkomsgerigte onderrig (UGO) het 'n groei- en hersieningsfase beleef en is vir die afsienbare toekoms hier om te bly. Die 2009-inname van studente op universiteit is die eerste matrikulante wat slegs binne die nuwe bedeling onderrig ontvang het. Hierdie matrikulante se graad 12-uitslae is deur onnatuurlik hoe punte in wiskunde gekenmerk. Die vraag wat gevra word, is hoe die 2009-inname van studente in wiskunde op universiteit vaar wat prestasie, algemene vaardighede, wiskundige vaardighede en inhoudverwante vaardighede betref. Dit blyk dat alhoewel hierdie studente beter toegerus is wat persoonlike eienskappe soos selfvertroue betref, hulle in baie gevalle swakker daaraan toe is wat wiskundige en inhoudverwante vaardighede betref. Voorstelle word gemaak om die oorgang van sekondere na tersiere wiskunde gladder te maak. Are students who have been educated in an outcomes-based approach prepared for university mathematics? Following the political changes of 1994 in South Africa, the decision was taken to replace the traditional skills-based education system at primary and secondary school level (Grades 1 - 12) with an outcomes-based education system (OBE). The OBE approach, referred to as Curriculum 2005, was introduced into schools in 1998. The implementation of the OBE system did not occur without problems, giving rise to revised initiatives and a fair amount of criticism. The 2009 intake of students at universities is the first group of students that had been subjected to the OBE approach for their entire school career. This is also the first group of students for whom some form of mathematics was compulsory up to Grade 12 level in the form of mathematics or mathematical literacy. These students were characterised by the fact that their mathematics marks for Grade 12 were exceptionally high and that many more students qualified for university entrance. This article reports on the impact of this new education system on the mathematics preparedness of students entering university. The study involves an empirical analysis of the students in the first-year mathematics course for engineering students at the University of Pretoria as well as an analysis of a questionnaire completed by experienced lecturers at this university. The question addressed in this article is how the 2009 intake of students cope with mathematics at university level with regard to Performance General attributes Mathematical attributes Content-related attributes Results indicate a decrease in mathematics performance of these students at university level and that the inflated matric marks result in unjustified expectations. However, it is not unusual for marks to decrease from school to university and there is still too little evidence for serious concern. The study also indicates that these students seem to be better equipped with regard to personal attributes such as self-confidence and the will to work. However, in many instances, their general mathematical attributes such as algebraic manipulation skills and their general mastery of mathematical writing are worse than those of students in the past. There are also areas where their content knowledge is either lacking or unexpectedly shallow. It therefore appears that these students have improved personal attributes but not necessarily the knowledge and mathematical skills to back them up. Some recommendations are made with regard to handling the situation. It is clear that the new school system necessitates changes at school level with a view to university level in order to ensure a transition that is surmountable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生是否在大学学习?:导航和概览样式
Uitkomsgerigte onderrig(UGO)在她的职业生涯中取得了巨大的进步。2009年,在一所大学的学生宿舍里,她是一位母亲,她一直在床上睡觉。Hierdie matrikulante se graad 12 uitslae是在wiskunde gekenmerk的两名女子。Die vraag wat gevra word,是2009年在威斯康辛大学就读的一名学生,他是一名学生。这是一个非常好的学生,他是一个很好的学生。Voorstelle单词gemaak来自于一个叫vansekondre的单词。受过基于结果的教育的学生是否为大学数学做好了准备?1994年南非发生政治变化后,决定以成果教育制度取代传统的中小学(1-12年级)技能教育制度。OBE方法,即2005年课程,于1998年引入学校。OBE制度的实施并非没有问题,引发了修订后的举措和相当多的批评。2009年大学招收的学生是第一批在整个学校生涯中接受OBE方法的学生。这也是第一批以数学或数学素养的形式在12年级之前必须学习某种形式的数学的学生。这些学生的特点是,他们12年级的数学成绩非常高,有更多的学生有资格进入大学。本文报道了这种新的教育体系对进入大学的学生数学准备的影响。这项研究包括对比勒陀利亚大学工程系一年级数学课程学生的实证分析,以及对该大学经验丰富的讲师完成的问卷调查的分析。本文所要解决的问题是,2009年招收的学生如何应对大学数学水平的表现一般属性数学属性内容相关属性结果表明,这些学生在大学数学水平上的表现有所下降,过高的录取分数导致了不合理的期望。然而,分数从一所学校下降到另一所大学并不罕见,而且仍然没有太多证据值得严重关注。研究还表明,这些学生似乎在自信和工作意愿等个人特质方面更有能力。然而,在许多情况下,他们的一般数学属性,如代数操作技能和对数学写作的总体掌握程度,都比过去的学生差。还有一些领域,他们的内容知识要么缺乏,要么出乎意料地肤浅。因此,这些学生似乎提高了个人素质,但不一定具备支持他们的知识和数学技能。就处理这种情况提出了一些建议。很明显,新的学校制度需要从学校一级到大学一级进行变革,以确保过渡是可以克服的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ondersoek na energiekoste van die inkorporering van ’n latentehitte-termiese-energieopbergstelsel in ’n Suid-Afrikaanse koelkamer Zircon as feedstock for zirconium chemicals, ceramics, the metal and alloys: A review Gesondheidsevaluasie van stedelike eike ( Quercus robur L.) met behulp van fisiologiese parameters: ’n Suid-Afrikaanse gevallestudie Investigation of energy costs for incorporating a latent heat thermal energy storage system into a South African cold room Structural equations model to analyse the critical variables related to smart card technology adoption in South African public healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1