Validation and reliability of the Munich Shoulder Questionnaire for Turkish patients with shoulder dysfunction

Q3 Health Professions Physiotherapy Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pq.2020.102161
D. Kocamaz, G. Ekici, E. Karabulut
{"title":"Validation and reliability of the Munich Shoulder Questionnaire for Turkish patients with shoulder dysfunction","authors":"D. Kocamaz, G. Ekici, E. Karabulut","doi":"10.5114/pq.2020.102161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Shoulder dysfunction is one of the most important upper extremity problems that limit the quality of life of individuals. Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ) is a self-assessment tool that allows an easy follow-up and evaluation for clinicians. The aim of this study was to describe the process applied to translate MSQ into Turkish and to test its validity and reliability. Methods. The questionnaire involves socio-demographic data, as well as objective and subjective items for shoulder dysfunction. The study investigated 180 patients with shoulder dysfunction. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by the intra-class correlation coefficient. Pearson’s correlation coefficient served to examine the convergent validity. The SPSS 23.0 software was used for the statistical analysis. Results. The patients’ average age equalled 44.3 ± 11.6 years. in most cases (76.7%), the diagnosis was shoulder impingement syndrome. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the MSQ objective and subjective sections were 0.73 and 0.96, respectively. The MSQ total score was positively correlated with the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire total score (r = 0.70; p < 0.01) and the Shoulder Pain and disability index total score (r = 0.65; p < 0.01). Conclusions. The Turkish version of MSQ is a valid, reliable, and responsive instrument for evaluating shoulder dysfunctions. in addition, MSQ-Turkish is satisfactory for evaluating shoulder dysfunctions and its use is recommended to follow up conservative, manipulative, and surgical treatments.","PeriodicalId":37315,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pq.2020.102161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Shoulder dysfunction is one of the most important upper extremity problems that limit the quality of life of individuals. Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ) is a self-assessment tool that allows an easy follow-up and evaluation for clinicians. The aim of this study was to describe the process applied to translate MSQ into Turkish and to test its validity and reliability. Methods. The questionnaire involves socio-demographic data, as well as objective and subjective items for shoulder dysfunction. The study investigated 180 patients with shoulder dysfunction. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by the intra-class correlation coefficient. Pearson’s correlation coefficient served to examine the convergent validity. The SPSS 23.0 software was used for the statistical analysis. Results. The patients’ average age equalled 44.3 ± 11.6 years. in most cases (76.7%), the diagnosis was shoulder impingement syndrome. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the MSQ objective and subjective sections were 0.73 and 0.96, respectively. The MSQ total score was positively correlated with the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire total score (r = 0.70; p < 0.01) and the Shoulder Pain and disability index total score (r = 0.65; p < 0.01). Conclusions. The Turkish version of MSQ is a valid, reliable, and responsive instrument for evaluating shoulder dysfunctions. in addition, MSQ-Turkish is satisfactory for evaluating shoulder dysfunctions and its use is recommended to follow up conservative, manipulative, and surgical treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慕尼黑肩部问卷对土耳其肩部功能障碍患者的有效性和可靠性
介绍。肩关节功能障碍是影响个体生活质量的最重要的上肢问题之一。慕尼黑肩部问卷(MSQ)是一种自我评估工具,可以为临床医生提供方便的随访和评估。本研究的目的是描述将MSQ翻译成土耳其语的过程,并测试其有效性和可靠性。方法。问卷包括社会人口统计数据,以及肩部功能障碍的客观和主观项目。该研究调查了180例肩部功能障碍患者。Cronbach’s alpha用于评估内部一致性。用类内相关系数评价重测信度。Pearson相关系数用于检验收敛效度。采用SPSS 23.0软件进行统计分析。结果。患者平均年龄44.3±11.6岁。大多数病例(76.7%)诊断为肩撞击综合征。主观部分和客观部分的Cronbach’s alpha系数分别为0.73和0.96。MSQ总分与臂肩手残疾总分呈正相关(r = 0.70;p < 0.01)、肩痛与失能指数总分(r = 0.65;P < 0.01)。结论。土耳其版的MSQ是评估肩部功能障碍的有效、可靠和反应灵敏的工具。此外,MSQ-Turkish在评估肩部功能障碍方面令人满意,建议在保守、手法和手术治疗后使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Quarterly
Physiotherapy Quarterly Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Quarterly ISSN 2544-4395 (formerly Fizjoterapia ISSN 1230-8323) is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published in both paper and electronic format by the University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Poland. The original version of the journal is its paper issue. The Editorial Office accepts original papers on various aspects of physiotherapy and rehabilitation for publication. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical physiotherapy science are published at the highest priority. Letters to the Editor, reports from scientific meetings and book reviews are also considered. Physiotherapy Quarterly publishes papers that show depth, rigor, originality and high-quality presentation. The scope of the journal: evidence-based rehabilitation; the mechanisms of function or dysfunction; modern therapy methods; best clinical practice; clinical reasoning and decision-making processes; assessment and clinical management of disorders; exploration of relevant clinical interventions; multi-modal approaches; psychosocial issues; expectations, experiences, and perspectives of physiotherapists. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research articles are welcomed, together with systematic and high-quality narrative reviews.
期刊最新文献
Effect of two different types of exercise volumes on exercise capacity, physical activity and quality of life in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot study Sensory-based motor processing in children with specific learning disabilities The place of mobile applications in conservative management of stress urinary incontinence in women Effects of moderate exercise versus light exercise on fasting blood glucose in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Effect of a 6-week core stability training program on active trunk repositioning: a randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1