Comparative effect of Gong’s mobilization and Spencer technique to manage Frozen Shoulder

Q3 Health Professions Physiotherapy Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pq.2023.115415
S. Prasanth, Aparna Sudhan Mohana M, Sreejesh Sreedharan, A. Subbarayalu, Shahul P
{"title":"Comparative effect of Gong’s mobilization and Spencer technique to manage Frozen Shoulder","authors":"S. Prasanth, Aparna Sudhan Mohana M, Sreejesh Sreedharan, A. Subbarayalu, Shahul P","doi":"10.5114/pq.2023.115415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Physical therapy plays a significant role in managing frozen shoulder (FS), and it includes applying manual mobilization techniques to reduce pain, restore the extensibility of the shoulder capsule and increase range of motion (ROM). Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Gong's mobilization (GM) and Spencer technique (ST) in reducing pain, functional disability, and improving shoulder ROM on FS patients. Methods. A pre-and-post-test experimental study design was adopted, where thirty patients ( n = 30) diagnosed with unilateral FS were selected and randomized into two groups of 15 using a simple random technique. Subjects in experimental group 1(EG-I) received ST technique and ultrasound therapy (US), with Codman’s pendular exercise (CPE). Whereas experimental group II (EG-II) received GM technique and US, with CPE. The intervention lasted five days and consisted of one session every day. Three variables were assessed to study the treatment effectiveness both at the pre-intervention and at the end of the first week: (i) pain intensity as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale; (ii) shoulder ROM as measured by a goniometer (abduction, flexion, and medial rotation (MR)); and (iii) functional disability as measured by SPADI (Shoulder Pain Disability Index). Results. The EG-II showed a better reduction in pain intensity (mean difference (MD) of 0.87), SPADI (MD of 7), and increase in shoulder ROM (MD: 'abduction': 15.76; ‘Flexion’: 15.67; ‘MR’: 10.33) than the EG-I at 0.05 levels of significance. Conclusions. Gong’s mobilization was found to be more effective than Spencer's technique with ultrasound therapy and CPE in treating patients with FS. frozen shoulder, a wide range of beneficial treatments, both surgical and non-surgical, are available. The therapeutic management of frozen shoulder frequently differs significantly across clinicians and is based on personal experience rather than published research. This study contributed to the body of knowledge that both Gong's mobilization and the Spencer technique are found to have short-term effects on pain, functional disability, and shoulder range of motion. Further, Gong's mobilization is found to be more clinically significant than Spencer's approach, with greater improvements in shoulder flexion, abduction, medial rotation ROM, and functional disability. In addition, the study also provides evidence to the clinicians that Gong's mobilization with ultrasound therapy and a unique set of Codman pendular exercises can be used in combination with the physiotherapy treatment plan for patients with frozen shoulders. From the patients’ perspectives, this study’s findings will help understand the causes of frozen shoulder and how to manage it physiotherapeutically with the latest advanced techniques with pain-free, immediate, and short-term improvement. This study will also add evidence to the researcher’s knowledge of combined therapeutic interventions' effectiveness in managing","PeriodicalId":37315,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pq.2023.115415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction. Physical therapy plays a significant role in managing frozen shoulder (FS), and it includes applying manual mobilization techniques to reduce pain, restore the extensibility of the shoulder capsule and increase range of motion (ROM). Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Gong's mobilization (GM) and Spencer technique (ST) in reducing pain, functional disability, and improving shoulder ROM on FS patients. Methods. A pre-and-post-test experimental study design was adopted, where thirty patients ( n = 30) diagnosed with unilateral FS were selected and randomized into two groups of 15 using a simple random technique. Subjects in experimental group 1(EG-I) received ST technique and ultrasound therapy (US), with Codman’s pendular exercise (CPE). Whereas experimental group II (EG-II) received GM technique and US, with CPE. The intervention lasted five days and consisted of one session every day. Three variables were assessed to study the treatment effectiveness both at the pre-intervention and at the end of the first week: (i) pain intensity as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale; (ii) shoulder ROM as measured by a goniometer (abduction, flexion, and medial rotation (MR)); and (iii) functional disability as measured by SPADI (Shoulder Pain Disability Index). Results. The EG-II showed a better reduction in pain intensity (mean difference (MD) of 0.87), SPADI (MD of 7), and increase in shoulder ROM (MD: 'abduction': 15.76; ‘Flexion’: 15.67; ‘MR’: 10.33) than the EG-I at 0.05 levels of significance. Conclusions. Gong’s mobilization was found to be more effective than Spencer's technique with ultrasound therapy and CPE in treating patients with FS. frozen shoulder, a wide range of beneficial treatments, both surgical and non-surgical, are available. The therapeutic management of frozen shoulder frequently differs significantly across clinicians and is based on personal experience rather than published research. This study contributed to the body of knowledge that both Gong's mobilization and the Spencer technique are found to have short-term effects on pain, functional disability, and shoulder range of motion. Further, Gong's mobilization is found to be more clinically significant than Spencer's approach, with greater improvements in shoulder flexion, abduction, medial rotation ROM, and functional disability. In addition, the study also provides evidence to the clinicians that Gong's mobilization with ultrasound therapy and a unique set of Codman pendular exercises can be used in combination with the physiotherapy treatment plan for patients with frozen shoulders. From the patients’ perspectives, this study’s findings will help understand the causes of frozen shoulder and how to manage it physiotherapeutically with the latest advanced techniques with pain-free, immediate, and short-term improvement. This study will also add evidence to the researcher’s knowledge of combined therapeutic interventions' effectiveness in managing
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巩氏移位术与斯宾塞术治疗肩周炎的疗效比较
介绍。物理治疗在治疗肩周炎(FS)中起着重要的作用,它包括应用手动活动技术来减轻疼痛,恢复肩关节囊的可伸展性和增加活动范围(ROM)。目的:比较Gong’s mobilization (GM)和Spencer technology (ST)在减轻FS患者疼痛、功能障碍和改善肩关节活动度方面的效果。方法。采用测试前和测试后的实验研究设计,选择30例诊断为单侧FS的患者(n = 30),采用简单随机技术随机分为两组,每组15例。实验组1(EG-I)接受ST技术和超声治疗(US),并进行Codman钟摆运动(CPE)。实验II组(EG-II)采用转基因技术和US, CPE。干预持续了五天,每天一次。评估三个变量来研究干预前和第一周结束时的治疗效果:(i)用视觉模拟量表测量疼痛强度;(ii)肩关节活动度,通过测角仪测量(外展、屈曲和内旋);(iii)用SPADI(肩痛残疾指数)衡量的功能性残疾。结果。EG-II在疼痛强度(平均差值(MD)为0.87)、SPADI (MD)为7)和肩部活动度(MD: '外展':15.76;“弯曲”:15.67;' MR ': 10.33)在0.05水平上显著高于eg - 1。结论。在治疗FS患者时,Gong的动员术被发现比Spencer的超声治疗和CPE技术更有效。肩周炎有多种有益的治疗方法,包括手术治疗和非手术治疗。不同临床医生对肩周炎的治疗方法常常存在显著差异,并且基于个人经验而非已发表的研究。这项研究使人们认识到Gong的活动和Spencer技术对疼痛、功能性残疾和肩部活动范围都有短期影响。此外,Gong的活动被发现比Spencer的入路更有临床意义,在肩关节屈曲、外展、内侧旋转ROM和功能性残疾方面有更大的改善。此外,本研究也为临床医生提供了证据,证明龚氏动员超声治疗和一套独特的Codman钟摆练习可以与物理治疗方案结合应用于肩周炎患者。从患者的角度来看,这项研究的发现将有助于了解肩周炎的原因,以及如何用最新的先进技术进行无痛、即时和短期改善的物理治疗。本研究还将为研究人员对联合治疗干预在管理方面的有效性的认识提供证据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Quarterly
Physiotherapy Quarterly Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Quarterly ISSN 2544-4395 (formerly Fizjoterapia ISSN 1230-8323) is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published in both paper and electronic format by the University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Poland. The original version of the journal is its paper issue. The Editorial Office accepts original papers on various aspects of physiotherapy and rehabilitation for publication. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical physiotherapy science are published at the highest priority. Letters to the Editor, reports from scientific meetings and book reviews are also considered. Physiotherapy Quarterly publishes papers that show depth, rigor, originality and high-quality presentation. The scope of the journal: evidence-based rehabilitation; the mechanisms of function or dysfunction; modern therapy methods; best clinical practice; clinical reasoning and decision-making processes; assessment and clinical management of disorders; exploration of relevant clinical interventions; multi-modal approaches; psychosocial issues; expectations, experiences, and perspectives of physiotherapists. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research articles are welcomed, together with systematic and high-quality narrative reviews.
期刊最新文献
Effect of two different types of exercise volumes on exercise capacity, physical activity and quality of life in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot study Sensory-based motor processing in children with specific learning disabilities The place of mobile applications in conservative management of stress urinary incontinence in women Effects of moderate exercise versus light exercise on fasting blood glucose in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Effect of a 6-week core stability training program on active trunk repositioning: a randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1