Factors associated with rota virus diarrhea in the post vaccine period as seen at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya

Q4 Medicine East African medical journal Pub Date : 2018-04-30 DOI:10.4314/eamj.v94i9
P. Nyagah, C. Onyambu, N. Kimani, M. Wambugu, A. Aywak
{"title":"Factors associated with rota virus diarrhea in the post vaccine period as seen at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya","authors":"P. Nyagah, C. Onyambu, N. Kimani, M. Wambugu, A. Aywak","doi":"10.4314/eamj.v94i9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Academic dishonesty, or cheating as commonly expressed, is an age-old practice that is widespread across the whole world. The Kenyan experience is anecdotal with limited studies, especially in medical schools. This study shares the experience of medical students about this challenging vice.Objective: To determine the level and forms of academic dishonesty in Moi University, School of Medicine.Design: Cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaire.Setting: The School of Medicine, Moi University, Eldoret-Kenya.Subjects: One hundred and fifty-six students in the clinical (4th, 5th and 6th) years of study.Results: Eighty percent of the students were aware of academic dishonesty, 75% had witnessed it in progress while 60.9% confessed to participating in it. The proportion of dishonest students varied with year of study and those previously exposed to academic dishonesty in secondary school and males were more likely to be involved. A majority (72.6%) of those engaged in academic dishonesty believed that their classmates were also doing it. The leading forms of academic dishonesty were signing nominal rolls for absent friends and cheating in examinations using illegal notes and electronic access to information.Conclusion: Academic dishonesty is prevalent with the majority of those involved believing that their classmates are also into the practice. The leading forms of academic dishonesty include both traditional analog and modern digital methods.","PeriodicalId":11399,"journal":{"name":"East African medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v94i9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Academic dishonesty, or cheating as commonly expressed, is an age-old practice that is widespread across the whole world. The Kenyan experience is anecdotal with limited studies, especially in medical schools. This study shares the experience of medical students about this challenging vice.Objective: To determine the level and forms of academic dishonesty in Moi University, School of Medicine.Design: Cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaire.Setting: The School of Medicine, Moi University, Eldoret-Kenya.Subjects: One hundred and fifty-six students in the clinical (4th, 5th and 6th) years of study.Results: Eighty percent of the students were aware of academic dishonesty, 75% had witnessed it in progress while 60.9% confessed to participating in it. The proportion of dishonest students varied with year of study and those previously exposed to academic dishonesty in secondary school and males were more likely to be involved. A majority (72.6%) of those engaged in academic dishonesty believed that their classmates were also doing it. The leading forms of academic dishonesty were signing nominal rolls for absent friends and cheating in examinations using illegal notes and electronic access to information.Conclusion: Academic dishonesty is prevalent with the majority of those involved believing that their classmates are also into the practice. The leading forms of academic dishonesty include both traditional analog and modern digital methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚Moi教学和转诊医院疫苗接种后与轮状病毒腹泻相关的因素
目的:描述后疫苗时代轮状病毒腹泻的流行及相关因素。设计:横断面研究。单位:莫伊教学转诊医院儿科急诊科。参与者:2岁以下急性腹泻患儿。数据收集到采访者管理的问卷和Certest®快速轮状病毒粪便抗原检测。主要结局指标:社会人口学和临床特征包括:年龄、性别、轮状病毒抗原检测结果、脱水程度和人体测量值。结果:311例急性腹泻患者入组,其中轮状病毒阳性55.6%(173/311)。在双变量分析中,完成常规疫苗接种(p=0.030)、接种两剂轮状病毒疫苗(p=0.005)和营养状况(p=0.009)与轮状病毒检测阳性相关。logistic回归分析:轻度消瘦(OR 2.581;CI 95% 1.068-6.236;p=0.035)和中度消瘦(OR 3.424;可信区间(95% 1.221-9.604;p=0.019)与轮状病毒阳性腹泻相关。接种两次轮状病毒疫苗(OR 0.151;CI 95% 0.032-0.709;p=0.017)和适龄完成常规疫苗接种(OR 0.478;CI 95% 0.256-0.892;p=0.003)具有保护作用。轮状病毒流行高峰出现在旱季。接种一种轮状病毒疫苗、严重营养不良和社会人口特征(如年龄、儿童的主要照顾者、过度拥挤)在统计上没有显著意义。虽然大多数轮状病毒阳性腹泻儿童有非严重脱水(63%,109/173),但这也不显著(OR 1.066;CI 95% 0.6695- 1.699;p=0.786)。结论:本研究区2岁以下儿童轮状病毒腹泻的患病率仍然较高。需要两种轮状病毒疫苗才能获得充分保护。应加强宣传和公共卫生干预,以提高疫苗覆盖率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East African medical journal
East African medical journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The East African Medical Journal is published every month. It is intended for publication of papers on original work and reviews of all aspects of medicine. Communications bearing on clinical and basic research on problems relevant to East Africa and other African countries will receive special attention. Papers submitted for publication are accepted only on the understanding they will not be published elsewhere without the permission of the Editor-in-Chief
期刊最新文献
NATIONAL HIV TESTING CAMPAIGNS TO SUPPORT UNAIDS 90-90-90 AGENDA: A LESSON FROM KENYA. TRANSLATION AND DETERMINATION OF THE COMPREHENSIBILITY OF A LUGANDA VERSION OF ORAL MUCOSITIS DAILY QUESTIONNAIRE. Atrial fibrillation. Louse-borne relapsing fever. Sickle cell Anaemia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1