Religious Perspectives on the Origin of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of a Sharia-based Community

Q3 Arts and Humanities Mankind Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.46469/mq.2023.63.3.6
A. Manan, Kamarullah Kamarullah, Cut Intan Salasiyah, Ibrahim Champion
{"title":"Religious Perspectives on the Origin of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of a Sharia-based Community","authors":"A. Manan, Kamarullah Kamarullah, Cut Intan Salasiyah, Ibrahim Champion","doi":"10.46469/mq.2023.63.3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Catastrophes such as natural disasters, conflicts, and epidemics bring difficulties and misfortunes, but people also retain hope. The recent coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has tested people on what they feel and are reliant on, particularly their beliefs. It is intriguing to examine the perspectives of a community with strong religious beliefs during this pandemic. In this article, we explore the religious perspectives of Sharia-based communities in Aceh Province, Indonesia, on the origin and meaning of the pandemic, which might affect their belief systems. We limited our critical assessment to philosophical theodicies and the shift in rationalizing the outbreak. Our study revealed how the virus triggered people to integrate logic with spiritual thoughts. Data were retrieved from twenty informants with various backgrounds to sample a cross-section of perspectives. During the difficult days of the epidemic, people pondered ‘who' and ‘why', which led them to think about theodicy, which we used as the basis for our research. By utilizing a narrative inquiry, three premises were classified: COVID-19 is God's doing, COVID-19 is not an intervention of God, and COVID-19 is still controlled by God, not other factors. The first premise turned out to be the dominant one, being based on the locals' strong belief in the omnipotence of God. This reveals a widespread understanding of the origin of the pandemic that can be compared with other systems of meaning in different religions. © 2023 Ulster Institute for Social Research. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":35516,"journal":{"name":"Mankind Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mankind Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46469/mq.2023.63.3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Catastrophes such as natural disasters, conflicts, and epidemics bring difficulties and misfortunes, but people also retain hope. The recent coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has tested people on what they feel and are reliant on, particularly their beliefs. It is intriguing to examine the perspectives of a community with strong religious beliefs during this pandemic. In this article, we explore the religious perspectives of Sharia-based communities in Aceh Province, Indonesia, on the origin and meaning of the pandemic, which might affect their belief systems. We limited our critical assessment to philosophical theodicies and the shift in rationalizing the outbreak. Our study revealed how the virus triggered people to integrate logic with spiritual thoughts. Data were retrieved from twenty informants with various backgrounds to sample a cross-section of perspectives. During the difficult days of the epidemic, people pondered ‘who' and ‘why', which led them to think about theodicy, which we used as the basis for our research. By utilizing a narrative inquiry, three premises were classified: COVID-19 is God's doing, COVID-19 is not an intervention of God, and COVID-19 is still controlled by God, not other factors. The first premise turned out to be the dominant one, being based on the locals' strong belief in the omnipotence of God. This reveals a widespread understanding of the origin of the pandemic that can be compared with other systems of meaning in different religions. © 2023 Ulster Institute for Social Research. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠疫情起源的宗教视角:以伊斯兰教法为基础的社区分析
自然灾害、冲突、流行病等灾难带来困难和不幸,但人们也抱有希望。最近的冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行考验了人们的感受和依赖,特别是他们的信仰。在这次大流行期间,研究一个有强烈宗教信仰的社区的观点是很有趣的。在本文中,我们探讨了印度尼西亚亚齐省以伊斯兰教为基础的社区对大流行的起源和意义的宗教观点,这可能会影响他们的信仰体系。我们将批判性评估限制在哲学的神正论和将疫情合理化的转变上。我们的研究揭示了病毒是如何引发人们将逻辑与精神思想结合起来的。数据是从20名不同背景的线人中提取的,以取样一个视角的横截面。在疫情艰难的日子里,人们思考“谁”和“为什么”,这导致他们思考神正论,这是我们研究的基础。通过叙事探究,我们将三个前提分类为:COVID-19是上帝的作为,COVID-19不是上帝的干预,COVID-19仍然由上帝控制,而不是其他因素。第一个前提被证明是占主导地位的,它基于当地人对上帝无所不能的强烈信仰。这揭示了对流行病起源的广泛理解,可以与不同宗教的其他意义体系进行比较。©2023阿尔斯特社会研究所。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mankind Quarterly
Mankind Quarterly Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Mankind Quarterly was founded as a quarterly journal of anthropology, in the broadest sense of "the science of man," in 1961. This was a time when the "study of man" had already diversified into physical anthropology, ethnography, quantitative cross-cultural research, archaeology and other subspecialties. Psychological and linguistic approaches were explored but the genetic study of population structure and population history was still in its infancy.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Mind the Gaps: Between Prediction, Explanation, and Application Recovery from Xenophobic Attacks in South Africa. A Perspective of Congolese Refugees Living in Durban, South Africa Revisiting Power Struggles during the Eritrean War of Independence Index to Volume 63 A Genetic Hypothesis for American Race/Ethnic Differences in Mean [i]g[/i]: A Reply to Warne (2021) with Fifteen New Empirical Tests Using the ABCD Dataset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1