Russian-Iranian Strategic Partnership in Syria: Converging Interests but Diverging Goals

Tan Tan, Mariia German
{"title":"Russian-Iranian Strategic Partnership in Syria: Converging Interests but Diverging Goals","authors":"Tan Tan, Mariia German","doi":"10.4236/ojps.2022.121001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strategic partnership is an evolving phenomenon, and there has been no consensus on its definition. But the academic endeavors by now manifest some degrees of congruence on the constitutive features of strategic partnership. This study first generalizes the constitutive features of strategic partnership. Then through the lens of these constitutive features, the relationship of Russia and Iran is examined. They have some converging interests in Syria: the common perception of a Western challenge, a high degree of military-security cooperation, similar economic motivations for their interventions in support of Assad regime, and the geopolitical importance of Syria to both countries. How-ever, they have diverging goals in Syria too: serious ideological differences, the instrumentality of Syria in Russia’s strategy, rivalry for influence, divergent policies to Israel, and potential competitors as energy suppliers. Thus, in the framework of the Syrian crisis, Russo-Iranian relations are difficult to characterize as typical strategic partnership. Their relationship is “tactical rather than strategic” and their interactions are “pragmatic rather than systematic”.","PeriodicalId":91589,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of political science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of political science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2022.121001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strategic partnership is an evolving phenomenon, and there has been no consensus on its definition. But the academic endeavors by now manifest some degrees of congruence on the constitutive features of strategic partnership. This study first generalizes the constitutive features of strategic partnership. Then through the lens of these constitutive features, the relationship of Russia and Iran is examined. They have some converging interests in Syria: the common perception of a Western challenge, a high degree of military-security cooperation, similar economic motivations for their interventions in support of Assad regime, and the geopolitical importance of Syria to both countries. How-ever, they have diverging goals in Syria too: serious ideological differences, the instrumentality of Syria in Russia’s strategy, rivalry for influence, divergent policies to Israel, and potential competitors as energy suppliers. Thus, in the framework of the Syrian crisis, Russo-Iranian relations are difficult to characterize as typical strategic partnership. Their relationship is “tactical rather than strategic” and their interactions are “pragmatic rather than systematic”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯-伊朗在叙利亚的战略伙伴关系:利益趋同但目标分歧
战略伙伴关系是一种不断发展的现象,对其定义尚未形成共识。但目前学术界对战略伙伴关系构成特征的研究呈现出一定程度的一致性。本研究首先概括了战略伙伴关系的构成特征。然后,通过这些构成特征的镜头,审视俄罗斯和伊朗的关系。他们在叙利亚有一些共同的利益:对西方挑战的共同看法,高度的军事安全合作,他们支持阿萨德政权的干预的相似经济动机,以及叙利亚对两国的地缘政治重要性。然而,他们在叙利亚问题上也有不同的目标:严重的意识形态分歧,叙利亚在俄罗斯战略中的作用,影响力的竞争,对以色列的不同政策,以及作为能源供应商的潜在竞争对手。因此,在叙利亚危机的框架下,俄伊关系很难被定性为典型的战略伙伴关系。他们的关系是“战术的而不是战略的”,他们的互动是“务实的而不是系统的”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Issue of Legitimacy of the Political Authority in Modern States Consensus and Climate Change The Civil and Political Rights in the Press Discourse of Britain’s Most Prominent News Websites Case Study: Just War Doctrine Make It or Break It with International Diplomacy: An Analysis of India and Nigeria’s Foreign Policy Pursuits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1