Representatie van sekswerk in Nederland: een vergelijking tussen Jojanneke in de prostitutie en Filemon op de Wallen

IF 0.3 4区 文学 Q4 COMMUNICATION Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5117/tvc2021.2.004.duit
L. Duits, Floor Boschhuizen
{"title":"Representatie van sekswerk in Nederland: een vergelijking tussen Jojanneke in de prostitutie en Filemon op de Wallen","authors":"L. Duits, Floor Boschhuizen","doi":"10.5117/tvc2021.2.004.duit","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Representation of sex work in the Netherlands: a comparison between Jojanneke in de prostitutie and Filemon op de Wallen Since 1999, sex work in the Netherlands has been partly legalized. Despite a reputation of tolerance, Dutch media represent sex workers as victims, opening the door to more restrictive policy. In this article, we report on a discourse analysis of two documentary series, Jojanneke in the prostitution (2015) and Filemon in the Red Light District (2017). We show that stigmatizing discourses dominate the former: sex work is brought as a gruesome, criminal practice, that even as a chosen profession is unattractive, where Dutch natives and escorts are the exception to the rule and where women lack agency. The latter title is more ambivalent. Discourses of sex work as work dominate, but it also emphasizes that sex work is an unattractive profession where Eastern-European workers are naive victims and that is inextricably related to crime. Recommendations for journalists to counter stigma are made.","PeriodicalId":42008,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/tvc2021.2.004.duit","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Representation of sex work in the Netherlands: a comparison between Jojanneke in de prostitutie and Filemon op de Wallen Since 1999, sex work in the Netherlands has been partly legalized. Despite a reputation of tolerance, Dutch media represent sex workers as victims, opening the door to more restrictive policy. In this article, we report on a discourse analysis of two documentary series, Jojanneke in the prostitution (2015) and Filemon in the Red Light District (2017). We show that stigmatizing discourses dominate the former: sex work is brought as a gruesome, criminal practice, that even as a chosen profession is unattractive, where Dutch natives and escorts are the exception to the rule and where women lack agency. The latter title is more ambivalent. Discourses of sex work as work dominate, but it also emphasizes that sex work is an unattractive profession where Eastern-European workers are naive victims and that is inextricably related to crime. Recommendations for journalists to counter stigma are made.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰性作品的代表:卖淫中的Jojanneke和红灯区的Filemon的比较
荷兰性工作的代表性:Jojanneke in de妓女与Filemon op de Wallen的比较自1999年以来,荷兰的性工作已部分合法化。尽管有着宽容的名声,荷兰媒体把性工作者描绘成受害者,这为更严格的政策打开了大门。在本文中,我们报告了两个纪录片系列的话语分析,Jojanneke In the prostitution(2015)和Filemon In the Red Light District(2017)。我们表明,污名化的话语主导着前者:性工作被视为一种可怕的犯罪行为,即使作为一种选择的职业也没有吸引力,荷兰本地人和陪护是规则的例外,女性缺乏代理。后一个标题更加矛盾。性工作作为工作的话语占主导地位,但它也强调性工作是一个没有吸引力的职业,东欧工人是天真的受害者,与犯罪密不可分。对记者应对污名提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
AI-disclosure en merkattitude Hoe halen chatbots de kink uit de kabel? Has the AI Revolution Started Yet? The Effect of an X Forewarning on the Detection and Likelihood to Follow a Social Bot, and the Moderating Role of Mutual Friends and Privacy Concerns Algoritmes nemen beslissingen over ons leven: hoe besluiten we of we automatische beslissingen van algoritmes willen accepteren?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1