Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound Guided Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block with Femoral Nerve Block for Surgical Fixation of Hip Fractures

Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4236/ojanes.2021.1111032
S. Manohara, Y. C. Lim, J. Qian
{"title":"Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound Guided Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block with Femoral Nerve Block for Surgical Fixation of Hip Fractures","authors":"S. Manohara, Y. C. Lim, J. Qian","doi":"10.4236/ojanes.2021.1111032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Regional anaesthesia techniques have been used for perioperative analgesia for hip fractures. The supra-inguinal approach to fascia iliaca block (FIB) can potentially provide superior analgesia compared to femoral nerve block (FNB) by blocking the obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of single shot FIB and FNB for surgical fixation of hip fractures. Methods: After obtaining ethics approval and written, informed consent, 30 patients undergoing surgical fixation of hip fractures were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. Patients received either a single shot FIB or FNB with 0.5% Ropivacaine 30 mls, and a subarachnoid block. Pain scores were assessed pre-operatively, post-block, in recovery and at 24 hours post-operatively. Time to first analgesic, oxynorm consumption, opioid related side effects and block related complications were assessed at 24 hours. Results: There were no statistically significant difference in post-block pain scores, median (IQR) of 0 (0 0) versus 0 (0 0) at rest and 3 (2 6) versus 5 (2 6) on positioning for spinal; and 24 hour pain scores were 0 (0 0) versus 0 (0 0) at rest and 4 (2 5) versus 5 (2 6) on movement for FIB and FNB groups respectively. 5 patients from each group required post-operative opioids, post-operative opioids requirement were similar. Conclusions: Though ultrasound guided supra-inguinal FIB was more consistent in blocking the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve then a femoral nerve block, this did not translate to any difference in terms of pain scores, opioid consumption and side effects.","PeriodicalId":90667,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"1657 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2021.1111032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Regional anaesthesia techniques have been used for perioperative analgesia for hip fractures. The supra-inguinal approach to fascia iliaca block (FIB) can potentially provide superior analgesia compared to femoral nerve block (FNB) by blocking the obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of single shot FIB and FNB for surgical fixation of hip fractures. Methods: After obtaining ethics approval and written, informed consent, 30 patients undergoing surgical fixation of hip fractures were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. Patients received either a single shot FIB or FNB with 0.5% Ropivacaine 30 mls, and a subarachnoid block. Pain scores were assessed pre-operatively, post-block, in recovery and at 24 hours post-operatively. Time to first analgesic, oxynorm consumption, opioid related side effects and block related complications were assessed at 24 hours. Results: There were no statistically significant difference in post-block pain scores, median (IQR) of 0 (0 0) versus 0 (0 0) at rest and 3 (2 6) versus 5 (2 6) on positioning for spinal; and 24 hour pain scores were 0 (0 0) versus 0 (0 0) at rest and 4 (2 5) versus 5 (2 6) on movement for FIB and FNB groups respectively. 5 patients from each group required post-operative opioids, post-operative opioids requirement were similar. Conclusions: Though ultrasound guided supra-inguinal FIB was more consistent in blocking the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve then a femoral nerve block, this did not translate to any difference in terms of pain scores, opioid consumption and side effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下腹股沟上髂筋膜阻滞与股神经阻滞在髋部骨折手术固定中的镇痛效果比较
区域麻醉技术已被用于髋部骨折的围手术期镇痛。与股神经阻滞(FNB)相比,腹股沟上入路髂筋膜阻滞(FIB)可以通过阻断闭孔神经和股外侧皮神经提供更好的镇痛效果。我们的目的是评价单针FIB和FNB在髋部骨折手术固定中的镇痛效果。方法:在获得伦理批准和书面知情同意后,招募30例髋部骨折手术固定患者,随机分为两组。患者接受单次FIB或FNB注射,0.5%罗哌卡因30毫升,蛛网膜下腔阻滞。分别在术前、阻滞后、恢复期间和术后24小时评估疼痛评分。24小时后评估首次镇痛时间、羟肟酮用量、阿片类药物相关副作用和阻滞相关并发症。结果:阻滞后疼痛评分无统计学差异,静止时中位(IQR)为0(0 0)与0(0 0),脊柱体位时中位(IQR)为3(2 6)与5 (2 6);FIB组和FNB组24小时疼痛评分分别为静止时0(0 0)对0(0 0)和运动时4(2 5)对5(2 6)。两组术后需阿片类药物5例,术后阿片类药物需要量相似。结论:虽然超声引导下腹股沟上FIB在阻断股外侧皮神经方面比股外侧皮神经阻滞更一致,但这并没有转化为疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗和副作用方面的任何差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1