Effect of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Lumbar Epidural Block on Postoperative Analgesia following Major Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Moaaz Tohamy, S. Amr, A. Mohammed, A. M. A. El-Rahman, B. Farouk, M. El-Naggar, M. M. Mohammed, M. Mohamed
求助PDF
{"title":"Effect of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Lumbar Epidural Block on Postoperative Analgesia following Major Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery","authors":"Moaaz Tohamy, S. Amr, A. Mohammed, A. M. A. El-Rahman, B. Farouk, M. El-Naggar, M. M. Mohammed, M. Mohamed","doi":"10.4236/ojanes.2021.1112033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Poor postoperative pain control leads to longer postoperative care, longer hospital stay and decreased patient overall satisfaction. Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block versus lumbar epidural block on the management of postoperative pain following major lower abdominal cancer surgery. Methods: The study was a double-blinded, and randomized study, conducted in South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Egypt. It included cancer patients scheduled for major lower abdominal cancer surgery in the period from 2019 to 2020. They were divided into two groups: Group Ι received pre-emptive ultrasoundguided Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side of the abdominal wall before induction of General Anesthesia (GA), and Group II received pre-emptive lumbar epidural block with 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine before induction of GA. VAS score, and time of the first analgesic request and postoperative total analgesic consumption were evaluated. Results: Sixty patients were included in our study. VAS score at rest was comparable between both studied groups in the first 6 h. At 8 and 10 h, Group II had a significantly higher VAS score at rest (P < 0.001 and 0.026 respectively). Meanwhile, at 12 h, patients in Group I had a significantly higher VAS score (P = 0.026). Mean time of the first request for rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group I (13.27 ± 2.38 hrs.) compared to Group II (10.20 ± 1.42 hrs.) (P < 0.001) respectively, mean total morphine consumption, How to cite this paper: Tohamy, M.M., Amr, S.A., Mohammed, A.A., El-Rahman, A.M.A., Farouk, B.R., El-Naggar, M.G.M., Mohammed, M.M. and Mohamed, M.A. (2021) Effect of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Lumbar Epidural Block on Postoperative Analgesia following Major Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery. Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 11, 335-346. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2021.1112033 Received: November 2, 2021 Accepted: December 11, 2021 Published: December 14, 2021 Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","PeriodicalId":90667,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2021.1112033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Background: Poor postoperative pain control leads to longer postoperative care, longer hospital stay and decreased patient overall satisfaction. Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block versus lumbar epidural block on the management of postoperative pain following major lower abdominal cancer surgery. Methods: The study was a double-blinded, and randomized study, conducted in South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Egypt. It included cancer patients scheduled for major lower abdominal cancer surgery in the period from 2019 to 2020. They were divided into two groups: Group Ι received pre-emptive ultrasoundguided Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side of the abdominal wall before induction of General Anesthesia (GA), and Group II received pre-emptive lumbar epidural block with 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine before induction of GA. VAS score, and time of the first analgesic request and postoperative total analgesic consumption were evaluated. Results: Sixty patients were included in our study. VAS score at rest was comparable between both studied groups in the first 6 h. At 8 and 10 h, Group II had a significantly higher VAS score at rest (P < 0.001 and 0.026 respectively). Meanwhile, at 12 h, patients in Group I had a significantly higher VAS score (P = 0.026). Mean time of the first request for rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group I (13.27 ± 2.38 hrs.) compared to Group II (10.20 ± 1.42 hrs.) (P < 0.001) respectively, mean total morphine consumption, How to cite this paper: Tohamy, M.M., Amr, S.A., Mohammed, A.A., El-Rahman, A.M.A., Farouk, B.R., El-Naggar, M.G.M., Mohammed, M.M. and Mohamed, M.A. (2021) Effect of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Lumbar Epidural Block on Postoperative Analgesia following Major Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery. Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 11, 335-346. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2021.1112033 Received: November 2, 2021 Accepted: December 11, 2021 Published: December 14, 2021 Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
超声引导下双侧腰方肌阻滞与腰硬膜外阻滞对下腹部肿瘤大手术术后镇痛效果的影响
背景:术后疼痛控制不良导致术后护理时间延长,住院时间延长,患者总体满意度下降。目的:比较超声引导下双侧腰方肌阻滞与腰硬膜外阻滞治疗下腹部重大肿瘤术后疼痛的疗效和安全性。方法:该研究是一项双盲、随机研究,在埃及Assiut大学南埃及癌症研究所进行。其中包括计划在2019年至2020年期间进行重大下腹部癌症手术的癌症患者。将患者分为两组:Ι组患者在全麻诱导前先行超声引导腰方肌阻滞(QLB),腹壁两侧各25 mL 0.25%布比卡因,II组患者在全麻诱导前先行腰硬膜外阻滞,0.25%布比卡因15 mL。评估VAS评分、首次镇痛请求时间及术后总镇痛消耗。结果:60例患者纳入我们的研究。两组患者在前6小时的休息时VAS评分具有可比性。在8和10小时,II组患者的休息时VAS评分显著高于对照组(P分别< 0.001和0.026)。同时,在12 h时,I组患者的VAS评分显著高于对照组(P = 0.026)。ⅰ组患者第一次请求抢救镇痛的平均时间(13.27±2.38 h)显著延长ⅱ组(10.20±1.42 h) (P < 0.001)。Tohamy, M.M., Amr, s.a., Mohammed, a.a., El-Rahman, a.m.a., Farouk, b.r., El-Naggar, m.g.m., Mohammed, M.M.和Mohamed, M.A.(2021)双侧超声引导下腰方肌阻滞与腰硬膜外阻滞对下腹部肿瘤手术后镇痛的影响。麻醉学杂志,11,335-346。https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2021.1112033收稿日期:2021年11月2日收稿日期:2021年12月11日出版日期:2021年12月14日版权所有©作者与科研出版公司。本作品采用知识共享署名国际许可协议(CC BY 4.0)。http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。