Effectiveness of the Suprainguinal Ultrasound-Guided Block for the Management of Postoperative Pain after Application of a Total Hip Prosthesis

Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4236/ojanes.2021.1110030
J. Donamou, A. Touré, A. Camara, Bangoura Almamy, Camara M’mah Lamine, C. Mohamed, Diallo Thierno Sadou, Dramé Boubacar Atigou, T. Aboubacar
{"title":"Effectiveness of the Suprainguinal Ultrasound-Guided Block for the Management of Postoperative Pain after Application of a Total Hip Prosthesis","authors":"J. Donamou, A. Touré, A. Camara, Bangoura Almamy, Camara M’mah Lamine, C. Mohamed, Diallo Thierno Sadou, Dramé Boubacar Atigou, T. Aboubacar","doi":"10.4236/ojanes.2021.1110030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided supraginguinal block (SIB) in the management of pain after total hip replacement. Material and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled study carried out in the anesthesia-intensive care unit of the Donka National Hospital in Conakry, over a period of 06 months (01/01/2020 to 30/06/2020). It concerned 32 patients: 16 patients in the “ultrasound-guided SIB” group and 16 patients in the “standard analgesia” group. Results: The pain scores assessed by the simple verbal scale and collected at the different time intervals (6H, 12H, 24H, 36H, 48H) showed mean scores < 1 in the ultrasound-guided SIB group while the mean scores were ≤3 in the standard analgesia group (P < 0.001). On movement, the mean pain scores were ≤1 for the ultrasound-guided SIB group versus mean scores > 3 in the standard analgesia group (P < 0.001). The time to mobilization was greater than 48 hours in all patients in the standard analgesia SIB provided better analgesia compared to standard analgesia for the management of postoperative pain after total hip replacement.","PeriodicalId":90667,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2021.1110030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided supraginguinal block (SIB) in the management of pain after total hip replacement. Material and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled study carried out in the anesthesia-intensive care unit of the Donka National Hospital in Conakry, over a period of 06 months (01/01/2020 to 30/06/2020). It concerned 32 patients: 16 patients in the “ultrasound-guided SIB” group and 16 patients in the “standard analgesia” group. Results: The pain scores assessed by the simple verbal scale and collected at the different time intervals (6H, 12H, 24H, 36H, 48H) showed mean scores < 1 in the ultrasound-guided SIB group while the mean scores were ≤3 in the standard analgesia group (P < 0.001). On movement, the mean pain scores were ≤1 for the ultrasound-guided SIB group versus mean scores > 3 in the standard analgesia group (P < 0.001). The time to mobilization was greater than 48 hours in all patients in the standard analgesia SIB provided better analgesia compared to standard analgesia for the management of postoperative pain after total hip replacement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下腹股沟上阻滞治疗全髋关节假体术后疼痛的效果
目的:评价超声引导下腹股沟上阻滞(SIB)治疗全髋关节置换术后疼痛的效果。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性、随机、单盲对照研究,在科纳克里东卡国立医院的麻醉重症监护病房进行,为期6个月(2020年1月1日至2020年6月30日)。32例患者:超声引导下SIB组16例,标准镇痛组16例。结果:超声引导下SIB组在不同时间间隔(6H、12H、24H、36H、48H)采用简单言语量表评定疼痛评分,平均评分< 1分,标准镇痛组平均评分≤3分(P < 0.001)。在运动方面,超声引导下SIB组的平均疼痛评分≤1分,而标准镇痛组的平均疼痛评分为bb0.3分(P < 0.001)。在全髋关节置换术后,与标准镇痛相比,SIB提供了更好的镇痛效果,所有患者的活动时间均大于48小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1