APPROACHES TO RISKS ASSESSMENT DURING POTASH-MAGNESIUM AND ROCK SALTS DEPOSITS EXPLOITATION

IF 0.1 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Proceedings of the Tula States University-Sciences of Earth Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.46689/2218-5194-2021-4-1-178-192

M.V. Pelipenk, I. Aynbinder, M. Rylnikova

{"title":"APPROACHES TO RISKS ASSESSMENT DURING POTASH-MAGNESIUM AND ROCK SALTS DEPOSITS EXPLOITATION","authors":"M.V. Pelipenk, I. Aynbinder, M. Rylnikova","doi":"10.46689/2218-5194-2021-4-1-178-192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The key segment which is prepared during hazardous facility safety justification de-velopment is the Assessment of Accident Risk. This article deals with the approaches to the assessment of accidents risks, specific hazards of ore and non-ore mines. The most significant hazards at a mine are rockfalls, rock bursts, ignitions and explosions of flammable gases, fires. Certain types of hazards can be assessed through failure rates, the ventilation system failure, for example, can be calculated on the basis of equipment failure rates, while other types of hazards, the rock bursts, for example, cannot be assessed using the existing (author-ized) methods. It is for that reason that this article reviews a principled approach to the as-sessment of mountain hazards, cites the description of the Factor Method, concerning the potash mines. The methodology cited in the article is the basis for the «Safety technologies» LLC standard «Recommended Practices of Assessment of Accidents Risks at Magnesium Mines» Accident Prevention Company Standard 4.21-2019.","PeriodicalId":41869,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tula States University-Sciences of Earth","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tula States University-Sciences of Earth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46689/2218-5194-2021-4-1-178-192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The key segment which is prepared during hazardous facility safety justification de-velopment is the Assessment of Accident Risk. This article deals with the approaches to the assessment of accidents risks, specific hazards of ore and non-ore mines. The most significant hazards at a mine are rockfalls, rock bursts, ignitions and explosions of flammable gases, fires. Certain types of hazards can be assessed through failure rates, the ventilation system failure, for example, can be calculated on the basis of equipment failure rates, while other types of hazards, the rock bursts, for example, cannot be assessed using the existing (author-ized) methods. It is for that reason that this article reviews a principled approach to the as-sessment of mountain hazards, cites the description of the Factor Method, concerning the potash mines. The methodology cited in the article is the basis for the «Safety technologies» LLC standard «Recommended Practices of Assessment of Accidents Risks at Magnesium Mines» Accident Prevention Company Standard 4.21-2019.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

钾镁岩盐矿床开采风险评价方法

危险设施安全论证开发的关键环节是事故风险评估。本文论述了矿矿山和非矿矿山事故风险、具体危害的评价方法。矿井中最严重的危险是落石、岩爆、易燃气体的点火和爆炸、火灾。某些类型的危险可以通过故障率来评估，例如通风系统的故障可以根据设备故障率来计算，而其他类型的危险，例如岩爆，不能使用现有的(授权的)方法来评估。正是由于这个原因，本文回顾了一种有原则的山地灾害评价方法，并引用了对钾肥矿山的因子法的描述。本文中引用的方法是“安全技术”有限责任公司标准“镁矿事故风险评估推荐做法”事故预防公司标准4.21-2019的基础。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the Tula States University-Sciences of Earth GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

自引率

0.00%

发文量