{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of IP-10 and MIG for the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis Disease","authors":"Y. Kobashi, K. Mouri, Shigeki Kato, M. Oka","doi":"10.4172/2161-1068.1000185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical potential of IP-10 and MIG as biomarkers of tuberculosis (TB) infection adding a comparison with IGRAs (QFT and T-SPOT.TB). \nMaterials and Methods: The subjects consisted of 52 patients with active TB disease and 86 patients with non-TB disease. We measured two IGRAs using peripheral blood (PB), and IP-10 and MIG using the supernatant from whole blood stimulated with MTB (Mycobacterium tuberculosis)-specific antigens. \nResults: In the patient group with active TB disease, while the positive response rates of QFT and T-SPOT.TB were 81% and 87%, that of IP-10 using the supernatant was 88% and that of MIG was 85%. In the patient group with non-TB disease, the positive response rate of QFT was 13%, and that of T-SPOT.TB was 14%, IP-10 using the supernatant was 14%, and that of MIG was 14%. The IP-10 and MIG levels of the patients with active TB disease using the supernatant were significantly higher than those of the patients with non-TB disease. The combination of four diagnostic methods using the supernatant increased the positive response rate to 94%. \nConclusion: IP-10 and MIG using a supernatant stimulated with MTB-specific antigens showed similar results to IGRAs. Therefore, these tests can be used as alternatives for the diagnosis of active TB disease.","PeriodicalId":74235,"journal":{"name":"Mycobacterial diseases : tuberculosis & leprosy","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2161-1068.1000185","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycobacterial diseases : tuberculosis & leprosy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1068.1000185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical potential of IP-10 and MIG as biomarkers of tuberculosis (TB) infection adding a comparison with IGRAs (QFT and T-SPOT.TB).
Materials and Methods: The subjects consisted of 52 patients with active TB disease and 86 patients with non-TB disease. We measured two IGRAs using peripheral blood (PB), and IP-10 and MIG using the supernatant from whole blood stimulated with MTB (Mycobacterium tuberculosis)-specific antigens.
Results: In the patient group with active TB disease, while the positive response rates of QFT and T-SPOT.TB were 81% and 87%, that of IP-10 using the supernatant was 88% and that of MIG was 85%. In the patient group with non-TB disease, the positive response rate of QFT was 13%, and that of T-SPOT.TB was 14%, IP-10 using the supernatant was 14%, and that of MIG was 14%. The IP-10 and MIG levels of the patients with active TB disease using the supernatant were significantly higher than those of the patients with non-TB disease. The combination of four diagnostic methods using the supernatant increased the positive response rate to 94%.
Conclusion: IP-10 and MIG using a supernatant stimulated with MTB-specific antigens showed similar results to IGRAs. Therefore, these tests can be used as alternatives for the diagnosis of active TB disease.