Do Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Form Cognitive Representations of Unconditioned Stimuli?

KiriLi N. Stauch, H. Wells, C. Abramson
{"title":"Do Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Form Cognitive Representations of Unconditioned Stimuli?","authors":"KiriLi N. Stauch, H. Wells, C. Abramson","doi":"10.46867/ijcp.2020.33.00.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research looking at expectancy in animals has used various experimental designs focusing on appetitive and avoidance behaviors. In this study, honey bees (Apis mellifera) were tested ina series of three proboscis extension response (PER) experiments to determine to what degree honey bees’ form a cognitive-representation of an unconditioned stimulus (US). Tthe first experiment, bees were presented with either a 2 sec. sucrose US or 2 sec. honey US appetitive reward and the proboscis-extension duration was measured under each scenario. The PER duration was longer for the honey US even though each US was presented for just 2 sec. Honey bees in the second experiment were tested during extinction trials on a conditioned stimulus (CS) of cinnamon or lavender that was paired with either the sucrose US or honey US in the acquisition trials. The proportion of bees showing the PER response to the CS was recorded for each extinction trial for each US scenario, as was the duration of the proboscis extension for each bee. Neither measure differed between the honey US and sucrose US scenarios, In experiment three, bees were presented with a cinnamon or lavender CS paired with either honey US or sucrose US in a set of acquisition trials, but here the US was not given until after the proboscis was retracted. The PER duration after the CS, and again subsequent after the US, were recorded. While the PER duration after the US was longer for honey, the PER duration after the CS did not differ between honey US and sucrose US.","PeriodicalId":39712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2020.33.00.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research looking at expectancy in animals has used various experimental designs focusing on appetitive and avoidance behaviors. In this study, honey bees (Apis mellifera) were tested ina series of three proboscis extension response (PER) experiments to determine to what degree honey bees’ form a cognitive-representation of an unconditioned stimulus (US). Tthe first experiment, bees were presented with either a 2 sec. sucrose US or 2 sec. honey US appetitive reward and the proboscis-extension duration was measured under each scenario. The PER duration was longer for the honey US even though each US was presented for just 2 sec. Honey bees in the second experiment were tested during extinction trials on a conditioned stimulus (CS) of cinnamon or lavender that was paired with either the sucrose US or honey US in the acquisition trials. The proportion of bees showing the PER response to the CS was recorded for each extinction trial for each US scenario, as was the duration of the proboscis extension for each bee. Neither measure differed between the honey US and sucrose US scenarios, In experiment three, bees were presented with a cinnamon or lavender CS paired with either honey US or sucrose US in a set of acquisition trials, but here the US was not given until after the proboscis was retracted. The PER duration after the CS, and again subsequent after the US, were recorded. While the PER duration after the US was longer for honey, the PER duration after the CS did not differ between honey US and sucrose US.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜜蜂会对非条件刺激形成认知表征吗?
先前对动物期望的研究使用了各种实验设计,重点关注食欲和回避行为。本研究以蜜蜂为研究对象,对其进行了一系列的三次伸喙反应(PER)实验,以确定蜜蜂在何种程度上形成了对非条件刺激的认知表征。在第一个实验中,蜜蜂分别获得2秒蔗糖或2秒蜂蜜的食欲奖励,并在每种情况下测量伸喙持续时间。蜂蜜US的PER持续时间更长,尽管每个US只有2秒。在第二个实验中,蜜蜂在肉桂或薰衣草的条件刺激(CS)下进行灭绝试验,在获取试验中与蔗糖US或蜂蜜US配对。在美国的每一种灭绝试验中,记录了每只蜜蜂对CS表现出PER反应的比例,以及每只蜜蜂的长喙延长的时间。在实验三中,在一组获取试验中,蜜蜂被提供了肉桂或薰衣草CS与蜂蜜US或蔗糖US配对,但在这里,直到长鼻收回后才给予美国。在CS之后的PER持续时间,以及在美国之后的PER持续时间,都被记录下来。虽然蜂蜜在US后的PER持续时间更长,但CS后的PER持续时间在蜂蜜US和蔗糖US之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Probable Play Behavior in a Surgeonfish (Naso vlamingii ) A Case Study of Spontaneous Category Formation and Behavioral Expression in a Language-Trained Steller Sea Lion Eumetopias jubatus Effortful foraging activity for uncertain food in pigeons Do belugas send sound cues? -Experimental verification of blindfolded imitation among beluga- Comparison of Paired- and Multiple-Stimulus Preference Assessments using a Runway Task by Dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1