Controlling Speed of DC Motor with Fuzzy Controller in Comparison with ANFIS Controller

Aisha Jilani, S. Murawwat, S. O. Jilani
{"title":"Controlling Speed of DC Motor with Fuzzy Controller in Comparison with ANFIS Controller","authors":"Aisha Jilani, S. Murawwat, S. O. Jilani","doi":"10.4236/ICA.2015.61008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machines have served the humanity starting from a simple ceiling fan to higher industrial applications such as lathe drives and conveyor belts. This research work aims at providing an appropriate software based control system because it provides computer featured applications, prevents rapid signal loss, reduces noise while also significantly improves the steady state and dynamic response of the motor. In this research paper, we have worked on DC motors due to its significant advantages over other types of machine drives. We have first individually studied Fuzzy and ANFIS (Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Interference System) controller in controlling speed for a separately excited DC motor. Afterwards, we have analyzed both results to conclude that which technique is better to be adopted for precisely controlling the speed of DC motor. Outcomes from MATLAB fuzzy logic toolbox for simulation of our schematic has been provided in this research work. Our study parameters include input voltage of DC motor, its speed, percentage overshoot and rising time of the output signal. Our proposed research has interpreted the outcomes that ANFIS controller is better than Fuzzy controller because it produces less percentage overshoot and causes less distortion of the output signal as the overshoot percentage of ANFIS controller is 8.2% while that of Fuzzy controller is 14.4%.","PeriodicalId":62904,"journal":{"name":"智能控制与自动化(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"智能控制与自动化(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ICA.2015.61008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Machines have served the humanity starting from a simple ceiling fan to higher industrial applications such as lathe drives and conveyor belts. This research work aims at providing an appropriate software based control system because it provides computer featured applications, prevents rapid signal loss, reduces noise while also significantly improves the steady state and dynamic response of the motor. In this research paper, we have worked on DC motors due to its significant advantages over other types of machine drives. We have first individually studied Fuzzy and ANFIS (Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Interference System) controller in controlling speed for a separately excited DC motor. Afterwards, we have analyzed both results to conclude that which technique is better to be adopted for precisely controlling the speed of DC motor. Outcomes from MATLAB fuzzy logic toolbox for simulation of our schematic has been provided in this research work. Our study parameters include input voltage of DC motor, its speed, percentage overshoot and rising time of the output signal. Our proposed research has interpreted the outcomes that ANFIS controller is better than Fuzzy controller because it produces less percentage overshoot and causes less distortion of the output signal as the overshoot percentage of ANFIS controller is 8.2% while that of Fuzzy controller is 14.4%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用模糊控制器控制直流电动机的速度与ANFIS控制器的比较
机器为人类服务,从简单的吊扇到更高的工业应用,如车床驱动器和传送带。本研究工作旨在提供一个合适的基于软件的控制系统,因为它提供了计算机功能的应用,防止快速信号丢失,降低噪声,同时也显著提高了电机的稳态和动态响应。在这篇研究论文中,我们研究了直流电机,因为它比其他类型的机器驱动器有显著的优势。本文首先分别研究了模糊控制器和自适应神经模糊干扰系统(ANFIS)控制器在单独励磁直流电机转速控制中的应用。然后,我们对两种结果进行了分析,以得出哪种技术更适合用于直流电机的精确控制。本研究提供了MATLAB模糊逻辑工具箱的仿真结果。我们的研究参数包括直流电动机的输入电压、转速、超调百分比和输出信号的上升时间。我们提出的研究结果解释了ANFIS控制器比模糊控制器更好,因为它产生的超调百分比更小,输出信号失真更小,ANFIS控制器的超调百分比为8.2%,而模糊控制器的超调百分比为14.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
243
期刊最新文献
Maximizing the Efficiency of Automation Solutions with Automation 360: Approaches for Developing Subtasks and Retry Framework Data-Driven Model Identification and Control of the Inertial Systems Using Singular Value to Set Output Disturbance Limits to Feedback ILC Control Blockchain-Based Islamic Marriage Certification with the Supremacy of Web 3.0 Artificial Intelligence Trends and Ethics: Issues and Alternatives for Investors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1