Evidence Emerging from the Survey on European Union Timber Regulation [REG. (EU) 995/2010] in Italy

H. Nermin, Carbone Francesco
{"title":"Evidence Emerging from the Survey on European Union Timber Regulation [REG. (EU) 995/2010] in Italy","authors":"H. Nermin, Carbone Francesco","doi":"10.4236/ojf.2022.121008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Illegal logging is a pervasive problem of major international concern that causes many negative social, economical and environmental consequences. EUTR is a tool adopted in 2010 and entered into force in 2013 to stop the trade of timber illegally logged within the EU market. The implementation in Italy is still in progress and varies among regions. This study considers the respondents’ opinions on different EUTR characteristics, implementation processes and compliance activities. Taking Italy as an example, the questionnaire was delivered to relevant Italian foresters and timber operators in the forest-timber system. Two hypotheses are under verification: 1) if Italian forest-wood-timber sector integrated EUTR into its activity and 2) if the Italian Due Diligence system is a valid model to other countries. The questionnaire has been submitted to the wood industry stakeholders. It has been organized into six sections to collect information about the professional characteristics of respondents, their experiences on EUTR, the opinion about EUTR and FLEGT, the support received on EUTR implementation, the opinion about the checks system, and the role of EUTR in marketing timber products. Questionnaire data have been elaborated in different ways. Conclusion underlines the EUTR Italian system criticalities and some suggestions for a more effective use of EUTR in the wood market. The picture that emerges from the results collected is that the EUTR, although proposed for morally and ethically valid purposes, doesn’t have unanimous effectiveness. In partic-ular, EUTR can generate a distortion of the market, new expenditures for importers. Various operators applaud the digitalization and computerization of EUTR certification, integration of EUTR certification with forest certifications schemes and other quality certifications, and use of EUTR in the marketing initiatives.","PeriodicalId":63552,"journal":{"name":"林学期刊(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"林学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2022.121008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Illegal logging is a pervasive problem of major international concern that causes many negative social, economical and environmental consequences. EUTR is a tool adopted in 2010 and entered into force in 2013 to stop the trade of timber illegally logged within the EU market. The implementation in Italy is still in progress and varies among regions. This study considers the respondents’ opinions on different EUTR characteristics, implementation processes and compliance activities. Taking Italy as an example, the questionnaire was delivered to relevant Italian foresters and timber operators in the forest-timber system. Two hypotheses are under verification: 1) if Italian forest-wood-timber sector integrated EUTR into its activity and 2) if the Italian Due Diligence system is a valid model to other countries. The questionnaire has been submitted to the wood industry stakeholders. It has been organized into six sections to collect information about the professional characteristics of respondents, their experiences on EUTR, the opinion about EUTR and FLEGT, the support received on EUTR implementation, the opinion about the checks system, and the role of EUTR in marketing timber products. Questionnaire data have been elaborated in different ways. Conclusion underlines the EUTR Italian system criticalities and some suggestions for a more effective use of EUTR in the wood market. The picture that emerges from the results collected is that the EUTR, although proposed for morally and ethically valid purposes, doesn’t have unanimous effectiveness. In partic-ular, EUTR can generate a distortion of the market, new expenditures for importers. Various operators applaud the digitalization and computerization of EUTR certification, integration of EUTR certification with forest certifications schemes and other quality certifications, and use of EUTR in the marketing initiatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟木材法规调查的证据。(EU) 995/2010]在意大利
非法采伐是一个普遍存在的问题,引起了国际社会的重大关注,造成了许多负面的社会、经济和环境后果。EUTR是一项于2010年通过并于2013年生效的工具,旨在阻止欧盟市场内非法采伐木材的贸易。意大利的执行工作仍在进行中,各地区情况不同。本研究考虑了受访者对不同EUTR特征、实施流程和合规活动的看法。以意大利为例,将调查问卷发放给意大利森林-木材系统中的相关林农和木材经营者。目前正在核查两个假设:1)意大利森林-木材-木材部门是否将EUTR纳入其活动;2)意大利的尽职调查制度是否为其他国家的有效模式。该问卷已提交给木材行业的利益相关者。调查分为六个部分,以收集受访者的专业特征、他们在EUTR方面的经验、对EUTR和FLEGT的意见、在EUTR实施方面获得的支持、对检查系统的意见以及EUTR在木材产品营销中的作用。问卷调查数据以不同的方式进行了阐述。结论强调了EUTR意大利体系的关键,以及在木材市场上更有效地使用EUTR的一些建议。从收集到的结果中得出的结论是,尽管提出EUTR的目的在道德和伦理上都是合理的,但它并不具有一致的有效性。特别是,EUTR会造成市场扭曲,给进口商带来新的支出。各运营商对EUTR认证的数字化和计算机化、EUTR认证与森林认证方案和其他质量认证的整合以及在营销活动中使用EUTR表示赞赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
303
期刊最新文献
Screening Tree Species for Carbon Storage Potential through Urban Tree Inventory in Planted Vegetation Vascular Flora from Ecoton Zones of the Slatioara Secular Forest Opinion of Stakeholders on the Management of Ecotourism in the Benue National Park of the North Region of Cameroon Riverscape Approach and Forestry Interventions for Ganga River Rejuvenation Some of the Mechanisms for Coexistence of Tree Species Diversity in Tropical Forests: A Review of Effects of Tree Density Dependence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1