Development of the concept of facet in Ranganathan’s writings

IF 0.1 4区 管理学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library and Information Science Pub Date : 2013-06-30 DOI:10.46895/lis.69.47
Nobuyuki Midorikawa
{"title":"Development of the concept of facet in Ranganathan’s writings","authors":"Nobuyuki Midorikawa","doi":"10.46895/lis.69.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study discusses the development of the concept of facet in Ranganathan’s writings. Method: Each writing of Ranganathan was chronologically investigated. Results: The writings of Ranganathan on ‘facet’ can be divided into three phases. In the first phase, the concept of facet and the facet formula were established. The Colon Classification (CC) has two characteristics: (1) it adopts a notation consisting of plural independent elements, and (2) each element constitutes a facet. In the second phase, the concept of the fundamental category was modified. In the past, it was assumed that the fundamental category serves as a guide that a classifier uses in facet analysis. As the need to deal with detailed and complex subjects gradually increased, a new role was assigned to the fundamental category so that it could manifest a large number of facets. However, the use of the fundamental category also resulted in a new problem: consistency in classification practice could not be maintained. In the third phase, Ranganathan proposed a solution to this problem by using postulates and principles. In this phase, he also attempted to clarify the relationship between faceted classification and analytico-synthetic classification and the position of the CC in existing classifications. However, he changed his idea in each writing. This is because Ranganathan was not able to clearly distinguish among three points of view: the two characteristics (1) and (2) of CC and (3) classification enables facet analysis and synthesis of notations.","PeriodicalId":42468,"journal":{"name":"Library and Information Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46895/lis.69.47","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This study discusses the development of the concept of facet in Ranganathan’s writings. Method: Each writing of Ranganathan was chronologically investigated. Results: The writings of Ranganathan on ‘facet’ can be divided into three phases. In the first phase, the concept of facet and the facet formula were established. The Colon Classification (CC) has two characteristics: (1) it adopts a notation consisting of plural independent elements, and (2) each element constitutes a facet. In the second phase, the concept of the fundamental category was modified. In the past, it was assumed that the fundamental category serves as a guide that a classifier uses in facet analysis. As the need to deal with detailed and complex subjects gradually increased, a new role was assigned to the fundamental category so that it could manifest a large number of facets. However, the use of the fundamental category also resulted in a new problem: consistency in classification practice could not be maintained. In the third phase, Ranganathan proposed a solution to this problem by using postulates and principles. In this phase, he also attempted to clarify the relationship between faceted classification and analytico-synthetic classification and the position of the CC in existing classifications. However, he changed his idea in each writing. This is because Ranganathan was not able to clearly distinguish among three points of view: the two characteristics (1) and (2) of CC and (3) classification enables facet analysis and synthesis of notations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
朗加纳坦作品中面概念的发展
目的:本研究探讨了“面”概念在兰加纳坦作品中的发展。方法:对《甘加纳坦》的每部著作按年代进行调查。结果:Ranganathan在“面”上的书写可分为三个阶段。第一阶段,建立了面形的概念和面形公式。冒号分类法(CC)有两个特点:(1)采用由多个独立元素组成的符号,(2)每个元素构成一个面。第二阶段,对基本范畴的概念进行了修正。在过去,人们认为基本类别是分类器在facet分析中使用的指南。随着处理详细和复杂问题的需要逐渐增加,给基本类别赋予了新的作用,使它能够表现许多方面。然而,基本类的使用也带来了一个新的问题:分类实践的一致性无法保持。在第三阶段,Ranganathan通过使用假设和原则提出了解决这个问题的方法。在这一阶段,他还试图阐明面形分类与分析综合分类之间的关系,以及面形分类在现有分类中的地位。然而,他在每次写作中都改变了自己的想法。这是因为Ranganathan不能清楚地区分三个观点:CC的两个特征(1)和(2)以及(3)分类使facet分析和符号合成成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Library and Information Science
Library and Information Science INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
40.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Library and Information Science is the official journal of the Mita Society for Library and Information Science. It is issued semiannually and prepared by the Editorial Committee of the Society.
期刊最新文献
日本の一般成人向け読書会が持つ性質 日本の公共図書館における高齢者サービス研究の変遷と課題 Conversion of JAPAN/MARC Bibliographic Records to NCR2018 Element-based Metadata The Early Library Education Model for the New Curriculum in Japan after World War II Visually Impaired People’s Information Needs and Sources on Health and Social Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1