Use and recognition of digital images of source materials by humanities researchers

IF 0.1 4区 管理学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library and Information Science Pub Date : 2013-12-20 DOI:10.46895/lis.70.119
Y. Minami
{"title":"Use and recognition of digital images of source materials by humanities researchers","authors":"Y. Minami","doi":"10.46895/lis.70.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This article aims to clarify how humanities researchers recognize the digitization of source materials and use them as academic resources. Various trials for the digitization of source materials have been performed for more than half a century in humanities research, and yet in library and information science, research on using digital images of source materials has only recently begun. Therefore, the recognition of digital images of source materials by humanities researchers has not been clarified. This article discusses the status of these images and the demand for digitization by humanities researchers. Methods: From July to October 2011, semi-structured interview surveys were conducted on 13 humanities researchers. They covered the use and recognition of source materials and their substitutes, such as facsimiles and digital images, on humanities research. Three main research approaches were used as the analytical framework for assessing the status and use of digital images: text, paratext, and context. Results: The text and paratext approaches showed that digital images of source materials can be used as an academic resource to varying degrees in humanities research. While several researchers argued that some information could only be obtained from source materials, others argued that there is a mutually complementary relationship between information obtained from digital images and source materials. The demand for digitization by humanities researchers can be classified as follows: digitization that is faithful to source materials, digitization by the collection unit, clarification of conditions, and the policies for digitization and improvement of bibliographic information.","PeriodicalId":42468,"journal":{"name":"Library and Information Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46895/lis.70.119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to clarify how humanities researchers recognize the digitization of source materials and use them as academic resources. Various trials for the digitization of source materials have been performed for more than half a century in humanities research, and yet in library and information science, research on using digital images of source materials has only recently begun. Therefore, the recognition of digital images of source materials by humanities researchers has not been clarified. This article discusses the status of these images and the demand for digitization by humanities researchers. Methods: From July to October 2011, semi-structured interview surveys were conducted on 13 humanities researchers. They covered the use and recognition of source materials and their substitutes, such as facsimiles and digital images, on humanities research. Three main research approaches were used as the analytical framework for assessing the status and use of digital images: text, paratext, and context. Results: The text and paratext approaches showed that digital images of source materials can be used as an academic resource to varying degrees in humanities research. While several researchers argued that some information could only be obtained from source materials, others argued that there is a mutually complementary relationship between information obtained from digital images and source materials. The demand for digitization by humanities researchers can be classified as follows: digitization that is faithful to source materials, digitization by the collection unit, clarification of conditions, and the policies for digitization and improvement of bibliographic information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人文学科研究人员对原始资料数字图像的使用和识别
目的:本文旨在阐明人文学者如何认识原始资料的数字化并将其作为学术资源加以利用。半个多世纪以来,在人文学科研究中,对原始资料数字化的各种尝试已经进行了,而在图书馆和信息科学中,使用原始资料数字图像的研究直到最近才开始。因此,人文学科研究者对原始资料数字图像的识别并没有得到明确。本文讨论了这些图像的现状以及人文学者对数字化的需求。方法:2011年7 - 10月对13名人文学科研究者进行半结构化访谈。他们涵盖了对原始材料及其替代品的使用和识别,如传真和数字图像,在人文科学研究中。三种主要的研究方法被用作评估数字图像现状和使用的分析框架:文本、准文本和上下文。结果:文本和准文本方法表明,源材料的数字图像在人文学科研究中可以不同程度地用作学术资源。一些研究人员认为有些信息只能从原始资料中获得,而另一些研究人员则认为从数字图像中获得的信息与原始资料之间存在着相互补充的关系。人文学科研究者对数字化的需求可分为忠实于文献的数字化、馆藏单位的数字化、条件的清晰化、书目信息数字化与改进的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Library and Information Science
Library and Information Science INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
40.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Library and Information Science is the official journal of the Mita Society for Library and Information Science. It is issued semiannually and prepared by the Editorial Committee of the Society.
期刊最新文献
日本の一般成人向け読書会が持つ性質 日本の公共図書館における高齢者サービス研究の変遷と課題 Conversion of JAPAN/MARC Bibliographic Records to NCR2018 Element-based Metadata The Early Library Education Model for the New Curriculum in Japan after World War II Visually Impaired People’s Information Needs and Sources on Health and Social Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1