Megaherbivores as pacemakers of carnivore diversity and biomass: distributing or sinking trophic energy?

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Evolutionary Ecology Research Pub Date : 2008-01-01 DOI:10.5167/UZH-9009
J. Hummel, M. Clauss
{"title":"Megaherbivores as pacemakers of carnivore diversity and biomass: distributing or sinking trophic energy?","authors":"J. Hummel, M. Clauss","doi":"10.5167/UZH-9009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Question: What is the trophic role of megaherbivores? Hypothesis: Depending on their life histories, megaherbivores can either act as sinks or distributors of trophic energy. Methods: Comparative review of mammal and dinosaur faunas, and aspects of their reproductive biology. Conclusion: Extant (mammalian) megaherbivore populations represent trophic sinks that potentially limit carnivore diversity and productivity, because they are immune to predation and follow a reproductive strategy of very few, well-protected offspring. In contrast, in dinosaur faunas, particularities of reproductive biology such as a larger number of offspring and limited parental care made a major part of megaherbivore biomass available to carnivores. This increase in available trophic energy in consequence allowed for larger body masses and higher species diversity of dinosaur carnivores.","PeriodicalId":50469,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Ecology Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"925-930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Ecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-9009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Question: What is the trophic role of megaherbivores? Hypothesis: Depending on their life histories, megaherbivores can either act as sinks or distributors of trophic energy. Methods: Comparative review of mammal and dinosaur faunas, and aspects of their reproductive biology. Conclusion: Extant (mammalian) megaherbivore populations represent trophic sinks that potentially limit carnivore diversity and productivity, because they are immune to predation and follow a reproductive strategy of very few, well-protected offspring. In contrast, in dinosaur faunas, particularities of reproductive biology such as a larger number of offspring and limited parental care made a major part of megaherbivore biomass available to carnivores. This increase in available trophic energy in consequence allowed for larger body masses and higher species diversity of dinosaur carnivores.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巨型食草动物作为食肉动物多样性和生物量的起搏器:营养能分布还是下沉?
问题:大型食草动物的营养作用是什么?假设:根据它们的生活史,大型食草动物既可以作为营养能量的储存者,也可以作为营养能量的分配者。方法:对哺乳动物和恐龙的区系及其生殖生物学方面的研究进行比较。结论:现存的(哺乳动物)巨型食草动物种群代表了潜在限制食肉动物多样性和生产力的营养汇,因为它们对捕食免疫,并且遵循极少数保护良好的后代的繁殖策略。相比之下,在恐龙动物群中,生殖生物学的特殊性,如后代数量较多和亲代照顾有限,使巨草食动物的大部分生物量可供食肉动物利用。因此,可利用营养能的增加使得食肉恐龙拥有更大的体重和更高的物种多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Ecology Research
Evolutionary Ecology Research 生物-进化生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Ecology Research publishes original research contributions focusing on the overlap between ecology and evolution. Papers may treat any taxon or be general. They may be empirical, theoretical or a combination of the two. EER prefers conceptual contributions that take intellectual risks or that test ideas.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the association between armour coverage and parasite infection in an estuarine population of stickleback. Efficient CRISPR-Cas9 editing of major evolutionary loci in sticklebacks. Within-niche pace of life acceleration as a fundamental evolutionary principle: a mammal pilot test case Sex-specific growth, shape, and their impacts on the life history of a long-lived vertebrate. Habitat preferences depend on substrate quality in a cooperative breeder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1