The Measurement of Teacher’s Beliefs About Ability: Development of the Beliefs About Learning and Teaching Questionnaire

Q4 Social Sciences Exceptionality Education International Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.5206/eei.v28i3.7771
Christine V. Glenn
{"title":"The Measurement of Teacher’s Beliefs About Ability: Development of the Beliefs About Learning and Teaching Questionnaire","authors":"Christine V. Glenn","doi":"10.5206/eei.v28i3.7771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to present the scale items, the statistical characteristics, and evidence of validity of the previously unpublished Beliefs about Learning and Teaching Questionnaire that examines elementary teachers’ epistemological beliefs and their beliefs about learning and teaching in inclusive classrooms. In this study, 186 teachers completed the questionnaire. Reliability analysis yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of .81. A factor analysis yielded four factors, including teachers’ beliefs about ability and their preferences for teacher-controlled and student-centred instruction. To examine the relationship between teachers’ beliefs about ability and their beliefs about disability and their responsibilities in working with students with disabilities, 36 teachers completed both the revised questionnaire and a semi-structured interview focused on beliefs and practices, the Pathognomonic-Interventionist Interview. The results suggest that teachers have varying beliefs about their roles and responsibilities in working with students with disabilities, and they provide evidence that these beliefs are related to their more widely held epistemological beliefs about ability. These range from a belief that ability is fixed and is unlikely to be influenced by learning and instruction, to a belief that ability is fluid and malleable, that it is increased by learning and therefore is responsive to instruction.","PeriodicalId":38584,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality Education International","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v28i3.7771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the scale items, the statistical characteristics, and evidence of validity of the previously unpublished Beliefs about Learning and Teaching Questionnaire that examines elementary teachers’ epistemological beliefs and their beliefs about learning and teaching in inclusive classrooms. In this study, 186 teachers completed the questionnaire. Reliability analysis yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of .81. A factor analysis yielded four factors, including teachers’ beliefs about ability and their preferences for teacher-controlled and student-centred instruction. To examine the relationship between teachers’ beliefs about ability and their beliefs about disability and their responsibilities in working with students with disabilities, 36 teachers completed both the revised questionnaire and a semi-structured interview focused on beliefs and practices, the Pathognomonic-Interventionist Interview. The results suggest that teachers have varying beliefs about their roles and responsibilities in working with students with disabilities, and they provide evidence that these beliefs are related to their more widely held epistemological beliefs about ability. These range from a belief that ability is fixed and is unlikely to be influenced by learning and instruction, to a belief that ability is fluid and malleable, that it is increased by learning and therefore is responsive to instruction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师能力信念的测量:《教与学信念问卷》的编制
本文的目的是展示以前未发表的关于学习和教学的信念问卷的量表项目,统计特征和有效性证据,该问卷调查了小学教师的认识论信念和他们对包容性课堂学习和教学的信念。本研究共对186名教师进行问卷调查。信度分析得出Cronbach 's alpha为0.81。因子分析产生了四个因素,包括教师对能力的信念,以及他们对教师控制和以学生为中心的教学的偏好。为了检验教师的能力信念与他们的残疾信念以及他们在与残疾学生一起工作时的责任信念之间的关系,36名教师完成了修改后的问卷和一项以信念和实践为重点的半结构化访谈,即病理干预访谈。结果表明,教师对他们在与残疾学生一起工作时的角色和责任有不同的信念,他们提供的证据表明,这些信念与他们更广泛持有的关于能力的认识论信念有关。从认为能力是固定的,不太可能受到学习和教学的影响,到认为能力是流动的和可塑的,可以通过学习提高,因此对教学有反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality Education International
Exceptionality Education International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
“We Need Structures in Place”: Educators’ Experiences With Special Education at International Schools Whereto From Here? A Discussion Among International Scholars of Inclusive Education Inclusive Change in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: A Collaborative Autoethnography Predictors of Self-Efficacy for Inclusive Education: A Comparison of Canada and Germany How Do Attitudes and Self-Efficacy Predict Teachers’ Intentions to Use Inclusive Practices? A Cross-National Comparison Between Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1