Emergency Department Intervention Program for Enhancing Choice at the Endof Life: A Quality Improvement Project at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

M. T. Cruz-Carreras, Patrick S Chaftari, Carmen E. Gonzalez, Rowena Enojo, Jayne Viets-Upchurch
{"title":"Emergency Department Intervention Program for Enhancing Choice at the Endof Life: A Quality Improvement Project at a Comprehensive Cancer Center","authors":"M. T. Cruz-Carreras, Patrick S Chaftari, Carmen E. Gonzalez, Rowena Enojo, Jayne Viets-Upchurch","doi":"10.4172/2165-7386.1000298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Advance care planning (ACP) for end-of-life care is especially important for individuals with terminal illnesses such as advanced cancer. It ensures that patients’ wishes are honored and alleviates the decisionmaking burden on family members and medical providers. It reduces unnecessary medical costs, and prevents waste of valuable resources. We proposed a quality improvement project to improve documentation of advanced care directives in the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary cancer center. \nMethods: We developed a pocket card to help emergency physicians screen patients in need of ACP. The goal was to assist ED staff in initiating conversations about end-of-life issues, and encourage patients and their caregivers to get involved in decisions about their medical treatment. \nIntervention: The project was implemented in a Plan-Do-Study-Act design. Baseline data was collected from the medical records of all patients visiting the ED on seven consecutive days prior to the distribution of the pocket card tool. After the launch of the intervention, the charts of all patients visiting the emergency center were reviewed for documentation of advanced care planning. Metrics polled included presence of a health care power of attorney and determination of code status, specifically the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status. \nResults: 429 patients who visited the ED seven consecutive days prior to institution of the screening tool. Of these, we found that 66 (15.4%) had indicated their do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status in their charts, and 82 (19.1%) had a health care power of attorney. Post launch of the intervention, 391 patients visited the ED over seven consecutive days. Of these, 125 (32.0%) indicated their DNR status in their charts before leaving the ED, and 95 (24.3%) had a health care power of attorney. After implementation of our screening tool, there was a 107.8% increase in documentation of DNR status and a 76% increase in patients with a health care power of attorney. \nConclusions: In this quality improvement project, a straightforward, low cost intervention was successfully implemented to improve documentation of patients’ ACP goals.","PeriodicalId":91127,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","volume":"2017 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7386.1000298","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7386.1000298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) for end-of-life care is especially important for individuals with terminal illnesses such as advanced cancer. It ensures that patients’ wishes are honored and alleviates the decisionmaking burden on family members and medical providers. It reduces unnecessary medical costs, and prevents waste of valuable resources. We proposed a quality improvement project to improve documentation of advanced care directives in the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary cancer center. Methods: We developed a pocket card to help emergency physicians screen patients in need of ACP. The goal was to assist ED staff in initiating conversations about end-of-life issues, and encourage patients and their caregivers to get involved in decisions about their medical treatment. Intervention: The project was implemented in a Plan-Do-Study-Act design. Baseline data was collected from the medical records of all patients visiting the ED on seven consecutive days prior to the distribution of the pocket card tool. After the launch of the intervention, the charts of all patients visiting the emergency center were reviewed for documentation of advanced care planning. Metrics polled included presence of a health care power of attorney and determination of code status, specifically the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status. Results: 429 patients who visited the ED seven consecutive days prior to institution of the screening tool. Of these, we found that 66 (15.4%) had indicated their do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status in their charts, and 82 (19.1%) had a health care power of attorney. Post launch of the intervention, 391 patients visited the ED over seven consecutive days. Of these, 125 (32.0%) indicated their DNR status in their charts before leaving the ED, and 95 (24.3%) had a health care power of attorney. After implementation of our screening tool, there was a 107.8% increase in documentation of DNR status and a 76% increase in patients with a health care power of attorney. Conclusions: In this quality improvement project, a straightforward, low cost intervention was successfully implemented to improve documentation of patients’ ACP goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科介入计划在生命末期加强选择:一个综合癌症中心的品质改善计画
背景:临终关怀的预先护理计划(ACP)对于患有晚期癌症等绝症的个体尤为重要。它确保了患者的意愿得到尊重,减轻了家庭成员和医疗提供者的决策负担。它减少了不必要的医疗费用,并防止宝贵资源的浪费。我们提出了一个质量改进项目,以改善三级癌症中心急诊科(ED)的高级护理指示文件。方法:我们开发了一种袖珍卡片,以帮助急诊医生筛选需要ACP的患者。目的是帮助急诊科的工作人员发起关于临终问题的对话,并鼓励病人和他们的护理人员参与他们的医疗决定。干预:项目采用计划-实施-研究-行动设计。基线数据是从分发口袋卡工具之前连续7天访问急诊科的所有患者的医疗记录中收集的。干预措施启动后,对所有到急救中心就诊的病人的病历进行了审查,以确定高级护理计划的文件。调查的指标包括医疗保健授权书的存在和代码状态的确定,特别是不复苏(DNR)状态。结果:429例患者在使用筛查工具前连续7天到急诊科就诊。其中,66例(15.4%)患者在病历中注明了不抢救(DNR)状态,82例(19.1%)患者有医疗授权书。干预启动后,391名患者在连续7天内访问了急诊科。其中,125人(32.0%)在离开急诊科前在病历中表明了他们的DNR状态,95人(24.3%)有医疗授权书。在实施我们的筛查工具后,DNR状态的记录增加了107.8%,拥有医疗授权书的患者增加了76%。结论:在本质量改进项目中,成功实施了一种简单、低成本的干预措施,以改善患者ACP目标的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is type 2 Diabetes a Hereditary Condition? Causes, Genes, and Preventative Measures. Evaluation of Factors Influencing Breastfeeding in Children Aged 0 to 24 Months Received in an Urban Community Health Center in Abidjan Cocody (Cote d'Ivoire) Effect of Matrix Rhythm Therapy in B/L Adductor Muscle Tightness in Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: A Case Report The Application of Combined Quality of Control Circle for Acute Spinal Cord Injury Silver Linings: The Experience of Hope in Dyads with Motor Neuron Disease. An Explorative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1