Groundwater quality in the Wassa West District of the Western Region of Ghana

Q4 Environmental Science West African Journal of Applied Ecology Pub Date : 2009-09-07 DOI:10.4314/WAJAE.V11I1.45729
Bk Kortatsi
{"title":"Groundwater quality in the Wassa West District of the Western Region of Ghana","authors":"Bk Kortatsi","doi":"10.4314/WAJAE.V11I1.45729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reconnaissance hydrochemical survey of 56 wells was conducted in the Wassa West District with the objective of providing baseline data for the establishment of groundwater quality monitoring stations. The data acquired is used in this paper to assess the quality of groundwater in the District. Groundwaters are mainly mildly aggressive with pH values in the range 4.5–6.9. However, a few of the boreholes show strong acidic character (pH range 3.7–4.0). The conductivity values are in the range 37–780 mS cm-1 with a mean 246.4 mS cm-1 suggesting the groundwaters are generally fresh and have short residence time. The groundwaters are moderately hard to very hard with only 40% of the samples representing soft waters. Groundwater quality is excellent with respect to major ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, HCO3 -, SO4 2-, Cl-) as they fall below their respective WHO guideline limits for water potability. Uncharacteristic of mining areas, trace metals loading of the groundwaters are generally low. All except aluminum, arsenic, barium, iron, manganese, mercury and nickel have concentrations well below the WHO guideline limits for water potability. Aluminum (0.0–2.5 mg l-1), iron (0.0–18.3 mg l-1) and manganese (0.0–2.41 mg l-1) are higher than WHO guideline limits of 0.2 mg l-1, 0.3 mg l-1 and 0.5 mg l-1 in more than 20%, 40% and 25% of the wells, respectively, and, therefore, pose significant aesthetic quality problems to groundwater quality. Mercury concentration exceeds the WHO guideline limit of 0.001 mg l-1 in all the wells during the rainy season and, thus, poses the greatest physiological threat for groundwater usage for drinking purposes in the District. Arsenic and barium exceeded the WHO guideline limit in less than 5% of the wells. Aesthetic problems can be eliminated using iron removal plants or aerators. These will induce the co-precipitation of trace metals with ferric oxyhydroxide. Limiting mercury usage in mining will curtail physiological problems.","PeriodicalId":39286,"journal":{"name":"West African Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":"11 1","pages":"25-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/WAJAE.V11I1.45729","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West African Journal of Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/WAJAE.V11I1.45729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Reconnaissance hydrochemical survey of 56 wells was conducted in the Wassa West District with the objective of providing baseline data for the establishment of groundwater quality monitoring stations. The data acquired is used in this paper to assess the quality of groundwater in the District. Groundwaters are mainly mildly aggressive with pH values in the range 4.5–6.9. However, a few of the boreholes show strong acidic character (pH range 3.7–4.0). The conductivity values are in the range 37–780 mS cm-1 with a mean 246.4 mS cm-1 suggesting the groundwaters are generally fresh and have short residence time. The groundwaters are moderately hard to very hard with only 40% of the samples representing soft waters. Groundwater quality is excellent with respect to major ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, HCO3 -, SO4 2-, Cl-) as they fall below their respective WHO guideline limits for water potability. Uncharacteristic of mining areas, trace metals loading of the groundwaters are generally low. All except aluminum, arsenic, barium, iron, manganese, mercury and nickel have concentrations well below the WHO guideline limits for water potability. Aluminum (0.0–2.5 mg l-1), iron (0.0–18.3 mg l-1) and manganese (0.0–2.41 mg l-1) are higher than WHO guideline limits of 0.2 mg l-1, 0.3 mg l-1 and 0.5 mg l-1 in more than 20%, 40% and 25% of the wells, respectively, and, therefore, pose significant aesthetic quality problems to groundwater quality. Mercury concentration exceeds the WHO guideline limit of 0.001 mg l-1 in all the wells during the rainy season and, thus, poses the greatest physiological threat for groundwater usage for drinking purposes in the District. Arsenic and barium exceeded the WHO guideline limit in less than 5% of the wells. Aesthetic problems can be eliminated using iron removal plants or aerators. These will induce the co-precipitation of trace metals with ferric oxyhydroxide. Limiting mercury usage in mining will curtail physiological problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳西部地区瓦萨西部地区的地下水质量
在瓦萨西区对56口井进行了水化学调查,为建立地下水水质监测站提供基线数据。本文利用采集到的数据对该区地下水水质进行了评价。地下水主要具有轻度侵蚀性,pH值在4.5 ~ 6.9之间。少数钻孔呈现强酸性特征(pH值范围为3.7 ~ 4.0)。电导率值在37 ~ 780 mS cm-1之间,平均值为246.4 mS cm-1,表明地下水普遍较新鲜,停留时间较短。地下水为中硬至极硬,只有40%的样品为软水。就主要离子(Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, HCO3 -, SO4 -, Cl-)而言,地下水质量非常好,因为它们低于各自的世卫组织饮用水指导限值。与矿区不同的是,地下水中微量金属的含量普遍较低。除铝、砷、钡、铁、锰、汞和镍外,所有元素的浓度都远低于世卫组织饮用水指导限值。超过20%、40%和25%的水井中铝(0.0-2.5 mg -1)、铁(0.0-18.3 mg -1)和锰(0.0-2.41 mg -1)的含量分别高于世卫组织0.2 mg -1、0.3 mg -1和0.5 mg -1的指导限值,因此对地下水质量构成严重的美学质量问题。雨季期间所有水井的汞浓度超过世卫组织0.001 mg l-1的指导限值,因此对该区用于饮用的地下水构成最大的生理威胁。在不到5%的水井中,砷和钡超过了世卫组织的指导限值。美观问题可以通过除铁装置或曝气器来消除。这将诱发微量金属与氢氧化铁的共析出。限制采矿中汞的使用将减少生理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
West African Journal of Applied Ecology
West African Journal of Applied Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This research journal has been established by the Ecological Laboratory Unit of the University of Ghana, Accra to publish original papers, invited articles and book reviews in English on general ecology. Papers are peer reviewed by consulting editors. The journal is targeted at scientists, policy makers and the general public. The subject areas to be covered include the following: -Theoretical and Applied Ecology- Environmental Studies- Environmental Management- Population Studies- Sustainable use of Natural Resources- Atmospheric Science- Aquatic Sciences and Oceanography- Terrestrial Ecology- Soil Sciences- Human Settlements- Disaster Preparedness and Disaster Reduction- Sustainable Development- Traditional Knowledge on Biodiversity and its sustainable use- Application in Agriculture and Land Use- Health and Environmental Protection
期刊最新文献
2. Climate variations, urban solid waste management and possible implications for Anopheles mosquito breeding in selected cities of coastal Ghana Bioenergy: Biodiesel from Freshwater Green Microalgae and a Cyanobacterium Occurring in Ghana Assessment of the Ecological Health Status of River Pra Estuary (Ghana) and Adjoining Wetland using Physico-chemical Conditions and Macroinvertebrate Bioindicators The Impact of Small Scale Mining on Irrigation Water Quality in Asante Akim Central Municipality of Ghana Ammonia Concentrations in Different Aquaculture Holding Tanks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1