Efficacy of epidural steroid injection in management of lumbar disc lesion

Hussein El-Ghait, A. Akar, Abdelazim Hegazy, Mahmoud El-Maadawy
{"title":"Efficacy of epidural steroid injection in management of lumbar disc lesion","authors":"Hussein El-Ghait, A. Akar, Abdelazim Hegazy, Mahmoud El-Maadawy","doi":"10.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_108_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim Low back pain and radiculopathy are the main annoying complaints in patients with degenerative disc diseases. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has a role to reduce pain and improve disability by decreasing inflammatory process at the nerve root caused by herniated disc. This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of lumbar ESI regarding the improvement of pain and functional outcome. Patients and methods This study was a prospective randomized study on 30 patients, aged between 30 and 65 years with low back pain and lumbar radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc prolapse with no absolute indication for surgery. The patients were treated by lumbar epidural injection of steroids. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: group 1 included 15 patients subjected to lumbar interlaminar ESI, and group 2 included 15 patients subjected to lumbar transforaminal ESI. Patients were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional capacity. They were followed up after 4 weeks, and clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the same tools for evaluation. Results The mean VAS for the 30 patients improved by 58.33% (P<0.001), and the mean ODI for the 30 patients improved by 35.4% after 4 weeks following injection (P<0.001). In group 1, the mean VAS improved by 52% and the mean ODI improved by 31.13% after 4 weeks following injection (P<0.001). In group 2, the mean VAS improved by 64.66% and the mean ODI improved by 39.66% after 4 weeks following injection (P<0.001). We found that the mean improvement of VAS and ODI was more in group 2 than in group 1(P<0.026). Conclusion We found by the end of the study that the ESI is a safe and effective procedure in alleviating radicular pain and improvement of functional outcome, but the transforaminal approach gives better results than the interlaminar approach.","PeriodicalId":7711,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"343 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_108_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and aim Low back pain and radiculopathy are the main annoying complaints in patients with degenerative disc diseases. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has a role to reduce pain and improve disability by decreasing inflammatory process at the nerve root caused by herniated disc. This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of lumbar ESI regarding the improvement of pain and functional outcome. Patients and methods This study was a prospective randomized study on 30 patients, aged between 30 and 65 years with low back pain and lumbar radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc prolapse with no absolute indication for surgery. The patients were treated by lumbar epidural injection of steroids. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: group 1 included 15 patients subjected to lumbar interlaminar ESI, and group 2 included 15 patients subjected to lumbar transforaminal ESI. Patients were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional capacity. They were followed up after 4 weeks, and clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the same tools for evaluation. Results The mean VAS for the 30 patients improved by 58.33% (P<0.001), and the mean ODI for the 30 patients improved by 35.4% after 4 weeks following injection (P<0.001). In group 1, the mean VAS improved by 52% and the mean ODI improved by 31.13% after 4 weeks following injection (P<0.001). In group 2, the mean VAS improved by 64.66% and the mean ODI improved by 39.66% after 4 weeks following injection (P<0.001). We found that the mean improvement of VAS and ODI was more in group 2 than in group 1(P<0.026). Conclusion We found by the end of the study that the ESI is a safe and effective procedure in alleviating radicular pain and improvement of functional outcome, but the transforaminal approach gives better results than the interlaminar approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硬膜外注射类固醇治疗腰椎间盘病变的疗效观察
背景与目的腰痛和神经根病是椎间盘退行性疾病患者的主要主诉。硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)通过减少椎间盘突出引起的神经根炎症过程来减轻疼痛和改善残疾。本研究旨在评估腰椎ESI在改善疼痛和功能预后方面的疗效。患者和方法本研究是一项前瞻性随机研究,纳入30例年龄在30 - 65岁之间的腰痛和腰椎间盘突出症患者,无绝对手术指征。采用腰椎硬膜外注射类固醇治疗。将患者随机分为两组:1组15例腰椎椎间腔内固定,2组15例腰椎椎间孔腔内固定。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛进行评分,并用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)对功能能力进行评估。4周后进行随访,使用相同的评估工具评估临床和功能结果。结果30例患者注射后4周VAS平均改善58.33% (P<0.001), ODI平均改善35.4% (P<0.001)。第1组注射后4周VAS平均改善52%,ODI平均改善31.13% (P<0.001)。2组注射后4周VAS平均改善64.66%,ODI平均改善39.66% (P<0.001)。2组VAS和ODI的平均改善程度明显高于1组(P<0.026)。结论在研究结束时,我们发现ESI在缓解神经根疼痛和改善功能预后方面是一种安全有效的手术,但经椎间孔入路比椎间孔入路效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conservative management versus ventilation tube insertion in children with otitis media with effusion accompanying cleft palate A study of the effect of some musical compositions on glucagon-like peptide 1, insulin, leptin, and body weight of crowded adult albino rats Protective role of Coenzyme Q10 on ultrastructure effect of sodium fluoride on the liver of adult male albino rats Comparative study between manipulation under anesthesia combined with local steroid injection versus local steroid injection alone in resistant cases of coccydynia Oral versus intravenous omeprazole in management of bleeding peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1