The Impact of Privatization on Efficiency and Productivity: The Case of American Public Hospitals

Zo Ramamonjiarivelo, Luceta McRoy, J. Epane, Larry R. Hearld, R. Weech-Maldonado
{"title":"The Impact of Privatization on Efficiency and Productivity: The Case of American Public Hospitals","authors":"Zo Ramamonjiarivelo, Luceta McRoy, J. Epane, Larry R. Hearld, R. Weech-Maldonado","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2015.16073abstract","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public hospitals typically operate in more challenging environments than private hospitals. Research suggests that privatization is one of the strategies that struggling public hospitals adopt to stay competitive. The purpose of this study was to examine whether privatization of public hospitals enhances efficiency and productivity. We used a national sample of non-federal acute care public hospitals in 1997 that was tracked through 2013, resulting in a cohort of 436 hospitals (7,386 hospital-year observations). Privatization was defined as conversion from public to either private not-for-profit or private for-profit status. Efficiency was measured by current assets turnover (CATO), fixed assets turnover (FATO), occupancy rate, full-time equivalent (FTE) employees per occupied bed, and work hours per adjusted patient day. Productivity was measured by case mix adjusted admissions per FTE. We controlled for organizational and market factors. Linear regressions with hospital and year fixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. Privatization from public to private status was associated with increased efficiency in terms of its positive associations with CATO (β =0.63) and FATO (β =0.23) and its negative association with FTE employees per occupied bed (β =-0.93) all at (p ≤ 0.001). Privatization was associated with increased productivity (β= 0.83; p ≤ 0.001).","PeriodicalId":56181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Finance","volume":"2015 1","pages":"16073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.16073abstract","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Public hospitals typically operate in more challenging environments than private hospitals. Research suggests that privatization is one of the strategies that struggling public hospitals adopt to stay competitive. The purpose of this study was to examine whether privatization of public hospitals enhances efficiency and productivity. We used a national sample of non-federal acute care public hospitals in 1997 that was tracked through 2013, resulting in a cohort of 436 hospitals (7,386 hospital-year observations). Privatization was defined as conversion from public to either private not-for-profit or private for-profit status. Efficiency was measured by current assets turnover (CATO), fixed assets turnover (FATO), occupancy rate, full-time equivalent (FTE) employees per occupied bed, and work hours per adjusted patient day. Productivity was measured by case mix adjusted admissions per FTE. We controlled for organizational and market factors. Linear regressions with hospital and year fixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. Privatization from public to private status was associated with increased efficiency in terms of its positive associations with CATO (β =0.63) and FATO (β =0.23) and its negative association with FTE employees per occupied bed (β =-0.93) all at (p ≤ 0.001). Privatization was associated with increased productivity (β= 0.83; p ≤ 0.001).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私有化对效率和生产力的影响:以美国公立医院为例
公立医院的运营环境通常比私立医院更具挑战性。研究表明,私有化是苦苦挣扎的公立医院为保持竞争力而采取的策略之一。本研究的目的是探讨公立医院私有化是否能提高效率和生产力。我们使用了1997年非联邦急症护理公立医院的全国样本,跟踪到2013年,结果是436家医院的队列(7386家医院年观察)。私有化被定义为从公共到私人非营利或私人营利性状态的转变。效率通过流动资产周转率(CATO)、固定资产周转率(FATO)、占用率、每个占用床位的全职等效员工(FTE)和每个调整病人日的工作时间来衡量。生产力是通过每个FTE的病例组合调整入院率来衡量的。我们控制了组织和市场因素。采用医院和年份固定效应模型的线性回归来检验假设。从公共到私人的私有化与效率的提高有关,其与CATO (β =0.63)和FATO (β =0.23)呈正相关,与每占用床位的FTE员工负相关(β =-0.93),均在(p≤0.001)。私有化与生产率提高相关(β= 0.83;P≤0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Care Finance
Journal of Health Care Finance Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Health Care Finance is the only quarterly journal devoted solely to helping you meet your facility"s financial goals. Each issue targets a key area of health care finance. Stay alert to new trends, opportunities, and threats. Make easier, better decisions, with advice from industry experts. Learn from the experiences of other health care organizations. Experts in the field share their experiences on successful programs, proven strategies, practical management tools, and innovative alternatives. The Journal covers today"s most complex dollars-and-cents issues, including hospital/physician contracts, alternative delivery systems, generating maximum margins under PPS.
期刊最新文献
Cost of Practice Transformation in Primary Care: Joining an Accountable Care Organization. Equity Issuance of Health Care Firms after the 2007 Market Crash and the 2010 Affordable Care Act Value of Physician Performance in Diabetes System of Care Among the Elderly Medicare Patients: Implications for Pay-for-Performance Assessing the cost burden of United States FDA-mandated post-approval studies for medical devices. The Growing Importance of Cost Accounting for Hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1