Pulsed and Tissue Doppler Echocardiographic Changes in Hypertensive Crisis with and without End Organ Damage

Taysir Garadah, S. Kassab, Saleh Gabani, Ahmed A. Abu-Taleb, Ahmed Abdelatif, A. Asef, Issa Shoroqi, A. Jamsheer
{"title":"Pulsed and Tissue Doppler Echocardiographic Changes in Hypertensive Crisis with and without End Organ Damage","authors":"Taysir Garadah, S. Kassab, Saleh Gabani, Ahmed A. Abu-Taleb, Ahmed Abdelatif, A. Asef, Issa Shoroqi, A. Jamsheer","doi":"10.4137/OJCS.S8094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Hypertensive crisis (HC) is a common medical emergency associated with acute rise in arterial blood pressure that leads to end-organ damage (EOD). Therefore, it is imperative to find markers that may help in the prediction of EOD in acute hypertensive crisis. Aim To assess the clinical presentations on admission; echocardiographic changes of pulsed and tissue Doppler changes in EOD patients compared with no EOD; and the risk of developing end organ damage for clinical and biochemical variables in hypertension crisis. Material and Methods The data of 241 patients with hypertensive crisis with systolic blood pressure (SBP) of >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >120 mmHg were extracted from patients files. Patients divided into hypertensive emergency (HE) with EOD, n = 62 and hypertensive urgency (HU) without EOD, n = 179. LV hypertrophy on ECG, echo parameters for wall thickness, left Ventricular mass index (LVMI), Body mass index (BMI), pulse Doppler ratio of early filling velocity E wave to late A wave (E/A) and ratio of E wave velocity to tissue Doppler Em to E wave (E/Em) were evaluated. Serum creatinine, hemoglobin, age, gender, body mass Index (BMI), history of diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, stroke and hyperlipidemia were recorded. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied for risk prediction of end organ damage of clinical variables. Results Patients with HE compared with HU were significantly older, with a significantly higher SBP on admission, high BMI and LVMI. Further there were significantly higher E/A ratio on Doppler echo and higher E/Em ratio on tissue Doppler echocardiogram. Multiple regression analysis with adjustment for age and sex shows positive predictive value with odds ratio of SBP on admission >220 mmHg of 1.98, serum creatinine > 120 µg/L of 1.43, older age > 60 year of 1.304, obesity (BMI ≥ 30) of 1.9, male gender of 2.26 and left ventricle hypertrophy on ECG of 1.92. The hemoglobin level, history of smoking, hyperlipidemia and DM were with no significant predictive value. The pulsed Doppler E/A ratio was ≥1.6, E/Em > 15, LVMI > 125 gm/m2 in patients with EOD compared with those without. Conclusion In patients presented with hypertensive crisis, the echo indices of E/A ratio and E/Em ratio of tissue Doppler are significantly higher in patients with hypertensive emergency compared to hypertensive urgency. The left ventricle hypertrophy on ECG, high LV mass index of >125 gm/m2, BMI > 30, old age > 60 year, male gender and history of hypertension and stroke were positive predictors of poor outcome and end organ damage.","PeriodicalId":90668,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"4 1","pages":"17 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/OJCS.S8094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/OJCS.S8094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Hypertensive crisis (HC) is a common medical emergency associated with acute rise in arterial blood pressure that leads to end-organ damage (EOD). Therefore, it is imperative to find markers that may help in the prediction of EOD in acute hypertensive crisis. Aim To assess the clinical presentations on admission; echocardiographic changes of pulsed and tissue Doppler changes in EOD patients compared with no EOD; and the risk of developing end organ damage for clinical and biochemical variables in hypertension crisis. Material and Methods The data of 241 patients with hypertensive crisis with systolic blood pressure (SBP) of >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >120 mmHg were extracted from patients files. Patients divided into hypertensive emergency (HE) with EOD, n = 62 and hypertensive urgency (HU) without EOD, n = 179. LV hypertrophy on ECG, echo parameters for wall thickness, left Ventricular mass index (LVMI), Body mass index (BMI), pulse Doppler ratio of early filling velocity E wave to late A wave (E/A) and ratio of E wave velocity to tissue Doppler Em to E wave (E/Em) were evaluated. Serum creatinine, hemoglobin, age, gender, body mass Index (BMI), history of diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, stroke and hyperlipidemia were recorded. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied for risk prediction of end organ damage of clinical variables. Results Patients with HE compared with HU were significantly older, with a significantly higher SBP on admission, high BMI and LVMI. Further there were significantly higher E/A ratio on Doppler echo and higher E/Em ratio on tissue Doppler echocardiogram. Multiple regression analysis with adjustment for age and sex shows positive predictive value with odds ratio of SBP on admission >220 mmHg of 1.98, serum creatinine > 120 µg/L of 1.43, older age > 60 year of 1.304, obesity (BMI ≥ 30) of 1.9, male gender of 2.26 and left ventricle hypertrophy on ECG of 1.92. The hemoglobin level, history of smoking, hyperlipidemia and DM were with no significant predictive value. The pulsed Doppler E/A ratio was ≥1.6, E/Em > 15, LVMI > 125 gm/m2 in patients with EOD compared with those without. Conclusion In patients presented with hypertensive crisis, the echo indices of E/A ratio and E/Em ratio of tissue Doppler are significantly higher in patients with hypertensive emergency compared to hypertensive urgency. The left ventricle hypertrophy on ECG, high LV mass index of >125 gm/m2, BMI > 30, old age > 60 year, male gender and history of hypertension and stroke were positive predictors of poor outcome and end organ damage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伴有和不伴有终末器官损害的高血压危象的脉冲和组织多普勒超声心动图变化
背景高血压危象(HC)是一种常见的医学急症,与动脉血压急性升高导致终末器官损伤(EOD)相关。因此,寻找有助于预测急性高血压危重期EOD的标志物势在必行。目的评价住院患者的临床表现;与非EOD患者相比,EOD患者的超声心动图脉冲和组织多普勒变化;高血压危重期临床生化指标发生终末器官损害的风险。材料与方法从患者档案中提取241例收缩压(SBP)为>80 mmHg或舒张压(DBP)为>120 mmHg的高血压危重症患者资料。患者分为合并EOD的高血压急症(HE) 62例和未合并EOD的高血压急症(HU) 179例。评价心电图左室肥厚、壁厚回声参数、左室质量指数(LVMI)、体质量指数(BMI)、早期充盈速度E波与晚期A波的脉冲多普勒比值(E/A)、E波速度与组织多普勒Em /E波比值(E/Em)。记录血清肌酐、血红蛋白、年龄、性别、体质指数(BMI)、糖尿病史、吸烟史、高血压史、脑卒中史、高脂血症史。应用多元logistic回归分析对临床变量终末器官损伤的风险进行预测。结果HE患者年龄明显大于HU患者,入院时收缩压明显增高,BMI和LVMI均较高。多普勒超声心动图E/A比和组织超声心动图E/Em比均显著增高。经年龄、性别校正的多元回归分析显示,入院时收缩压比值比>220 mmHg为1.98,血清肌酐> 120µg/L为1.43,老年> 60岁比值比1.304,肥胖(BMI≥30)1.9,男性2.26,心电图左心室肥厚1.92,具有阳性预测值。血红蛋白水平、吸烟史、高脂血症、糖尿病无显著预测价值。与非EOD患者相比,EOD患者的脉冲多普勒E/A比值≥1.6,E/Em >5, LVMI > 125 gm/m2。结论在出现高血压危象的患者中,高血压急症患者的E/A比和组织多普勒E/Em比的回声指标明显高于高血压急症患者。心电图显示左心室肥厚、左室质量指数b> 125 gm/m2、BMI b> 30、年龄b> 60岁、男性、高血压和脑卒中史是预后不良和终末器官损害的阳性预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Analysis of Facial Fractures in Kuwait Head Injury as a Risk Factor for Inpatient Mortality Among Fall Patients in Malawi Can the Risk of the N Diseases Development be Related to the Degree of Differentiation of Tumor Cells and the Presence of Peritumoral Lymphocytic Infiltration in the Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Effectiveness of Efferent Loop Stimulation Prior to Protective Ileostomy Closure Short Profile of Children with Recurrent Inguinal Hernia in a Teaching Hospital in Enugu, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1