Self-Management Interventions to Prevent Depression in People with Mobility Limitations

IF 2.3 Q1 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Process and Outcome Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.4137/RPO.S39720
S. Driver, Katherine Froehlich-Grobe, Katherine D. Sanches
{"title":"Self-Management Interventions to Prevent Depression in People with Mobility Limitations","authors":"S. Driver, Katherine Froehlich-Grobe, Katherine D. Sanches","doi":"10.4137/RPO.S39720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction This focused review reports on the impact of self-management interventions on depression in people with a mobility disability. Method There were two phases to the search including a comprehensive scoping review of the literature examining multiple secondary conditions impacted by self-management programs (Phase 1) and a focused review of the literature detailing the impact of self-management interventions on depression (Phase 2). CINAHL, PubMed, and PsyclNFO were searched for articles published between January 1988 through August 2014 and studies were screened by the first author based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Twenty-five studies met criteria with results, demonstrating a mixed effect of self-management programs on depression. Sixteen studies included an intervention and control/comparison group, of which eight (50%) had a significant effect on depression. A further nine studies did not include a control/comparison group and five found significant changes in depression and four found no change. Eighteen out of 25 studies (72%) were rated as having moderate-to-high bias and nine different outcome measures were used across studies. Discussion Based on the mixed findings and varied approaches adopted for intervention and outcome assessment, future research should adopt a more rigorous methodological approach to examine self-management interventions on depression.","PeriodicalId":41347,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Process and Outcome","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/RPO.S39720","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Process and Outcome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/RPO.S39720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction This focused review reports on the impact of self-management interventions on depression in people with a mobility disability. Method There were two phases to the search including a comprehensive scoping review of the literature examining multiple secondary conditions impacted by self-management programs (Phase 1) and a focused review of the literature detailing the impact of self-management interventions on depression (Phase 2). CINAHL, PubMed, and PsyclNFO were searched for articles published between January 1988 through August 2014 and studies were screened by the first author based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Twenty-five studies met criteria with results, demonstrating a mixed effect of self-management programs on depression. Sixteen studies included an intervention and control/comparison group, of which eight (50%) had a significant effect on depression. A further nine studies did not include a control/comparison group and five found significant changes in depression and four found no change. Eighteen out of 25 studies (72%) were rated as having moderate-to-high bias and nine different outcome measures were used across studies. Discussion Based on the mixed findings and varied approaches adopted for intervention and outcome assessment, future research should adopt a more rigorous methodological approach to examine self-management interventions on depression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我管理干预预防行动不便人群抑郁
本研究综述了自我管理干预对行动障碍患者抑郁症的影响。方法搜索分为两个阶段,包括对研究自我管理项目影响的多种次要条件的文献的全面范围审查(第一阶段)和对详细介绍自我管理干预对抑郁症影响的文献的重点审查(第二阶段)。检索1988年1月至2014年8月期间发表的文章,并由第一作者根据特定的纳入和排除标准筛选研究。结果25项研究的结果符合标准,证明了自我管理项目对抑郁症的影响好坏参半。16项研究包括干预和控制/对照组,其中8项(50%)对抑郁症有显著影响。另外九项研究没有包括对照组/对照组,其中五项发现抑郁症有显著变化,四项没有发现变化。25项研究中有18项(72%)被评为中度至高度偏倚,研究中使用了9种不同的结果测量方法。基于混合的研究结果和不同的干预和结果评估方法,未来的研究应该采用更严格的方法来检验抑郁症的自我管理干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advances in Rehabilitation Science and Practice (AdvRSP) Editorial: A Journal Showcasing Exciting Developments in the Field of Rehabilitation in Medical Conditions. Remote Delivery of Service: A Survey of Occupational Therapists' Perceptions. Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Pattern and Biomarkers of Physical Functioning of Prostate Cancer Survivors in Rehabilitation. Safety, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a New Virtual Rehabilitation Platform: A Supervised Pilot Study. The Potential of Computer Vision-Based Marker-Less Human Motion Analysis for Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1