Cidadania e identidade no estado democrático de direito: acerca da inclusão política do imigrante

M. R. Hamel, Jelson Becker Salomão
{"title":"Cidadania e identidade no estado democrático de direito: acerca da inclusão política do imigrante","authors":"M. R. Hamel, Jelson Becker Salomão","doi":"10.5216/phi.v25i1.52355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the inclusion of the immigrant in democratic political contexts. It aims to demonstrate that the proceduralist paradigm of law, proposed by Jürgen Habermas, offers the formal conditions required for Marcio Renan Hamel Jelson Becker Salomão PHILÓSOPHOS, GOIÂNIA, V. 25, N. 1, P.213-236, JAN./JUN. 2020. 234 the solution of the tension between political citizenship and national identity generated by the phenomenon of migration. Habermasian model aims to ensure, through the reflexive structure of law, the inviolability of the person and the ethical neutrality of the Democratic Constitutional State. Nevertheless, although Habermas had grounded the Democratic Principle on the idea of intersubjective recognition, he has not made fully explicit its normative content. Given that the idea of recognition may be interpreted in a purely descriptive sense, we argue that the plausibility of Habermasian proceduralist model depends on a conception of recognition as a moral posture that affirms intrinsic value of a person or group of persons.","PeriodicalId":30368,"journal":{"name":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v25i1.52355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the inclusion of the immigrant in democratic political contexts. It aims to demonstrate that the proceduralist paradigm of law, proposed by Jürgen Habermas, offers the formal conditions required for Marcio Renan Hamel Jelson Becker Salomão PHILÓSOPHOS, GOIÂNIA, V. 25, N. 1, P.213-236, JAN./JUN. 2020. 234 the solution of the tension between political citizenship and national identity generated by the phenomenon of migration. Habermasian model aims to ensure, through the reflexive structure of law, the inviolability of the person and the ethical neutrality of the Democratic Constitutional State. Nevertheless, although Habermas had grounded the Democratic Principle on the idea of intersubjective recognition, he has not made fully explicit its normative content. Given that the idea of recognition may be interpreted in a purely descriptive sense, we argue that the plausibility of Habermasian proceduralist model depends on a conception of recognition as a moral posture that affirms intrinsic value of a person or group of persons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民主法治下的公民身份与身份认同:论移民的政治包容
本文探讨了移民在民主政治语境中的包容问题。本文旨在证明由哈贝马斯提出的程序主义法律范式为马尔乔·雷南·哈默尔·耶尔森·贝克尔(salom, PHILÓSOPHOS, GOIÂNIA, V. 25, N. 1, P.213-236, jan /JUN.)提供了必要的形式条件。2020. 234 .解决移民现象所产生的政治公民身份与国家认同之间的紧张关系。哈贝马斯模式旨在通过法律的反身性结构,确保人的不可侵犯性和民主宪政国家的道德中立性。然而,尽管哈贝马斯将民主原则建立在主体间认同的基础上,但他并没有完全明确其规范性内容。鉴于承认的概念可以在纯粹的描述性意义上解释,我们认为哈贝马斯程序主义模型的合理性取决于承认作为一种肯定一个人或一群人的内在价值的道德姿态的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tropeços da igualdade no caminho da natureza à civilidade Quatro formas de silenciamento fundamento moral à forma da normatividade Descartes: a dúvida e suas dívidas A relevância da distinção kantiana entre virtude e boa vontade para o debate contemporâneo sobre a ética das virtudes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1