Gender differences in surveys for market definition and merger analysis

Q4 Social Sciences Competition Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-28 DOI:10.4337/clj.2021.04.04
Lola Damstra, Ludovica Salvyuolo, Gunnar Niels
{"title":"Gender differences in surveys for market definition and merger analysis","authors":"Lola Damstra, Ludovica Salvyuolo, Gunnar Niels","doi":"10.4337/clj.2021.04.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is increasing awareness of a ‘gender data gap’ in a range of academic, business and policy areas. The problem arises where policy or business decisions are made based on data that has been collected only on men (or by men, as survey designers), or on analyses of data in the aggregate without accounting for gender differences. Competition policy is one such area. Traditionally, consumers have been considered only by their willingness to pay, their (rational) preferences and their ability to substitute between products offered by firms. Meanwhile, firms are treated as entities that are defined by the profit-maximizing objectives of their owners, and only rarely seen as collections of people. Competition policy is gender blind, resulting in a gender data gap in competition. This article considers how surveys carried out for the purpose of market definition, merger analysis and switching behaviour should take account of gender differences.","PeriodicalId":36415,"journal":{"name":"Competition Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2021.04.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is increasing awareness of a ‘gender data gap’ in a range of academic, business and policy areas. The problem arises where policy or business decisions are made based on data that has been collected only on men (or by men, as survey designers), or on analyses of data in the aggregate without accounting for gender differences. Competition policy is one such area. Traditionally, consumers have been considered only by their willingness to pay, their (rational) preferences and their ability to substitute between products offered by firms. Meanwhile, firms are treated as entities that are defined by the profit-maximizing objectives of their owners, and only rarely seen as collections of people. Competition policy is gender blind, resulting in a gender data gap in competition. This article considers how surveys carried out for the purpose of market definition, merger analysis and switching behaviour should take account of gender differences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场定义和合并分析调查中的性别差异
在一系列学术、商业和政策领域,人们越来越意识到“性别数据差距”。当政策或商业决策是基于仅收集的关于男性(或由男性作为调查设计者)的数据,或基于对总体数据的分析而不考虑性别差异时,问题就出现了。竞争政策就是这样一个领域。传统上,消费者只考虑他们的支付意愿,他们的(理性)偏好和他们在公司提供的产品之间进行替代的能力。与此同时,企业被视为由其所有者的利润最大化目标所定义的实体,很少被视为人的集合。竞争政策是性别盲的,导致了竞争中的性别数据差距。本文考虑了为市场定义、合并分析和转换行为而进行的调查应如何考虑性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Competition Law Journal
Competition Law Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
If the Competition and Markets Authority were an emoji: merger clearance lessons from Meta/Giphy Economists on trial: how to make expert duties, meetings, and hot tubs work The UK and EU competition rules for research and development agreements: falling out of lockstep The assessment and communication of the benefits of competition interventions by the Competition and Markets Authority The risks of a form-based approach to exclusionary abuses of dominance – an economic perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1