As vulnerabilidades dos documentos digitais: Obsolescência tecnológica e ausência de políticas e práticas de preservação digital

IF 0.1 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Biblios-Revista de Bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion Pub Date : 2015-07-02 DOI:10.5195/BIBLIOS.2015.215
Henrique Machado dos Santos, Daniel Flores
{"title":"As vulnerabilidades dos documentos digitais: Obsolescência tecnológica e ausência de políticas e práticas de preservação digital","authors":"Henrique Machado dos Santos, Daniel Flores","doi":"10.5195/BIBLIOS.2015.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This paper attempts to discuss the theoretical issues related to the technological obsolescence, implementation of organizational policies, preservation strategies and computerized systems. Method. It develops the literature previously published materials such as books, theses, websites and articles in scientific journals indexed in Google Scholar and CAPES Journal Portal. Data collection is based on qualitative analysis, and performs a literature review can provide state of the art on preserving and fragility of digital documents. Results. Among the results can be considered the technological obsolescence as consequence of the technology itself motivated by unbridled development. In this way, it has been reaching software, file formats, operating systems and professionals responsible for preservation, and thus a significant part of the memory of contemporary societies is at risk. Conclusions. It highlights the importance of institutional policies, digital preservation strategies and computerized systems. Through these is can plan, monitor and treat digital documents, minimizing the effects of technological obsolescence in order to preserve its content and its reliability.","PeriodicalId":42369,"journal":{"name":"Biblios-Revista de Bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion","volume":"1 1","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblios-Revista de Bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/BIBLIOS.2015.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective. This paper attempts to discuss the theoretical issues related to the technological obsolescence, implementation of organizational policies, preservation strategies and computerized systems. Method. It develops the literature previously published materials such as books, theses, websites and articles in scientific journals indexed in Google Scholar and CAPES Journal Portal. Data collection is based on qualitative analysis, and performs a literature review can provide state of the art on preserving and fragility of digital documents. Results. Among the results can be considered the technological obsolescence as consequence of the technology itself motivated by unbridled development. In this way, it has been reaching software, file formats, operating systems and professionals responsible for preservation, and thus a significant part of the memory of contemporary societies is at risk. Conclusions. It highlights the importance of institutional policies, digital preservation strategies and computerized systems. Through these is can plan, monitor and treat digital documents, minimizing the effects of technological obsolescence in order to preserve its content and its reliability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字文档的漏洞:技术过时和缺乏数字保存政策和实践
目标。本文试图讨论与技术过时、组织政策的实施、保护策略和计算机化系统有关的理论问题。方法。它开发以前发表的文献,如书籍、论文、网站和b谷歌学者和CAPES期刊门户索引的科学期刊文章。数据收集以定性分析为基础,并进行文献综述,可以提供数字文档保存和脆弱性的最新技术。结果。在这些结果中,可以认为技术过时是由于技术本身被肆无忌惮的发展所驱动的结果。通过这种方式,它已经到达了负责保存的软件,文件格式,操作系统和专业人员,因此当代社会的很大一部分记忆处于危险之中。结论。它强调了制度政策、数字保存策略和计算机化系统的重要性。通过这些,他们可以计划、监控和处理数字文件,尽量减少技术过时的影响,以保持其内容和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
La web semántica en Europeana: una aproximación a la norma EDM Los archivos como un factor preponderante en un ecosistema de gobierno abierto en el México actual Una aplicación de la medición de la productividad científica de los investigadores en organizaciones universitarias cubanas “Deepfake” como ferramenta de manipulação e disseminação de “fakenews” em formato de vídeo nas redes sociais Libros, libreros y bibliotecas en la época virreinal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1