A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies Pub Date : 2019-09-16 DOI:10.5195/errs.2019.465
Suzi Adams
{"title":"A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory","authors":"Suzi Adams","doi":"10.5195/errs.2019.465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay considers Paul Ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory from 1956-1960. He discusses it in two texts: “What does Humanism Mean?” and the slightly later The Symbolism of Evil. In the former, cultural memory appears as an ongoing and dynamic process of retroaction focussed on questioning and rethinking the meaning of classical antiquity for contemporary worlds, on the one hand, that is linked to an important critical aspect as a counterweight to the flattening effects of modernity, on the other. In the latter, cultural memory expands the reach of the classical heritage, and, in addition to retroaction, further modes of orientation, such as relations of depth and breadth, are delineated. At first glance, cultural memory, in Ricœur’s sense, appears to be embodied in the singular, albeit generalized self. Yet, in reconstructing its meaning, the essay argues that Ricœur’s articulation of cultural memory relies on an implicit collective dimension. The present essay’s hermeneutic reconstruction of Ricœur’s notion of cultural memory comprises a preliminary step of a broader project that aims to rearticulate Jan and Aleida Assmann’s cultural memory framework along social imaginary lines. In this vein, the essay concludes with an overview of the Assmannian approach to cultural memory and considers possible bridges between Ricœur and the Assmanns.","PeriodicalId":51981,"journal":{"name":"Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2019.465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This essay considers Paul Ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory from 1956-1960. He discusses it in two texts: “What does Humanism Mean?” and the slightly later The Symbolism of Evil. In the former, cultural memory appears as an ongoing and dynamic process of retroaction focussed on questioning and rethinking the meaning of classical antiquity for contemporary worlds, on the one hand, that is linked to an important critical aspect as a counterweight to the flattening effects of modernity, on the other. In the latter, cultural memory expands the reach of the classical heritage, and, in addition to retroaction, further modes of orientation, such as relations of depth and breadth, are delineated. At first glance, cultural memory, in Ricœur’s sense, appears to be embodied in the singular, albeit generalized self. Yet, in reconstructing its meaning, the essay argues that Ricœur’s articulation of cultural memory relies on an implicit collective dimension. The present essay’s hermeneutic reconstruction of Ricœur’s notion of cultural memory comprises a preliminary step of a broader project that aims to rearticulate Jan and Aleida Assmann’s cultural memory framework along social imaginary lines. In this vein, the essay concludes with an overview of the Assmannian approach to cultural memory and considers possible bridges between Ricœur and the Assmanns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于Ricœur早期文化记忆概念的注解
这篇文章考虑了保罗Ricœur在1956-1960年间的早期文化记忆概念。他在两篇文章中讨论了这个问题:"人文主义意味着什么?以及稍晚一些的《邪恶的象征》。在前者中,文化记忆表现为一种持续的、动态的反作用过程,集中于质疑和重新思考古典古代对当代世界的意义,一方面,它与一个重要的批判性方面联系在一起,作为现代性扁平化效应的平衡,另一方面。在后者中,文化记忆扩展了古典遗产的范围,除了回溯之外,还描绘了进一步的定向模式,如深度和广度的关系。乍一看,文化记忆,在Ricœur的意义上,似乎体现在单一的,尽管广义的自我。然而,在重建其意义时,本文认为Ricœur对文化记忆的表达依赖于一个隐含的集体维度。本文对Ricœur文化记忆概念的解释学重建是一个更广泛项目的初步步骤,该项目旨在沿着社会想象线重新阐明Jan和Aleida Assmann的文化记忆框架。在这种脉络下,本文总结了阿斯曼人对文化记忆的方法,并考虑了Ricœur和阿斯曼人之间可能的桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies
Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Les tournants herméneutiques de Paul Ricœur Distantiation, Post-Critique, and Realism. Reconsidering the Relation of Phenomenology and Hermeneutics in Ricœur Herméneutique et phénoménologie. Tensions autour de la religion Introduction – L’articulation de la phénoménologie et de l’herméneutique chez Paul Ricœur De la sagesse poétique à la sagesse pratique. Quelle place pour les poètes et le poétique dans l’anthropologie de l’homme capable ricœurienne ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1