'for their own purposes of identity': Tom Stannage and Australian Local History

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY Public History Review Pub Date : 2013-12-31 DOI:10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3478
D. Carment
{"title":"'for their own purposes of identity': Tom Stannage and Australian Local History","authors":"D. Carment","doi":"10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tom Stannage made a significant contribution to Australian local history and regularly returned to it throughout his career, frequently speaking and writing about the local past and collaborating with the community organisations that promoted it. In the context of Stannage's perspectives, the work of some other historians and the author's experiences, this article briefly reflects on the state of local history in Australia and the role of local historical societies. The focus is on New South Wales and the Northern Territory, the parts of Australia that the author knows best, but some attention is also given to the rest of the country. The article considers why the work of local historians and historical societies matters in understanding the bigger picture of Australian history. The various attempts to tell the stories of individual communities quite frequently by and for local residents themselves encourage speculation on their contributions to the broader process of historical inquiry. Local history is, as Stannnage strongly believed it ought to be, usually a democratic phenomenon and one that allows a diverse range of approaches. The historical societies that survive and develop do so because they are solidly based in their communities. Perhaps even more crucial, the data of the past that local historical societies have often unearthed and recorded help allow Australians to shape what Stannage so aptly described as a 'history for their own purposes of identity'.","PeriodicalId":41934,"journal":{"name":"Public History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3478","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Tom Stannage made a significant contribution to Australian local history and regularly returned to it throughout his career, frequently speaking and writing about the local past and collaborating with the community organisations that promoted it. In the context of Stannage's perspectives, the work of some other historians and the author's experiences, this article briefly reflects on the state of local history in Australia and the role of local historical societies. The focus is on New South Wales and the Northern Territory, the parts of Australia that the author knows best, but some attention is also given to the rest of the country. The article considers why the work of local historians and historical societies matters in understanding the bigger picture of Australian history. The various attempts to tell the stories of individual communities quite frequently by and for local residents themselves encourage speculation on their contributions to the broader process of historical inquiry. Local history is, as Stannnage strongly believed it ought to be, usually a democratic phenomenon and one that allows a diverse range of approaches. The historical societies that survive and develop do so because they are solidly based in their communities. Perhaps even more crucial, the data of the past that local historical societies have often unearthed and recorded help allow Australians to shape what Stannage so aptly described as a 'history for their own purposes of identity'.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“为了他们自己的身份”:汤姆·斯坦纳奇和澳大利亚地方历史
汤姆·斯坦纳奇对澳大利亚当地历史做出了重大贡献,在他的职业生涯中,他经常回到当地,经常发表关于当地历史的演讲和写作,并与促进当地历史的社区组织合作。在斯坦纳奇的观点、其他一些历史学家的工作和作者的经历的背景下,本文简要地反思了澳大利亚地方历史的现状和地方历史学会的作用。这本书的重点是新南威尔士州和北领地,这是作者最熟悉的澳大利亚地区,但也对澳大利亚的其他地区给予了一些关注。这篇文章考虑了为什么当地历史学家和历史学会的工作对理解澳大利亚历史的大局很重要。由当地居民自己或为当地居民讲述个别社区故事的各种尝试,鼓励人们猜测他们对更广泛的历史调查过程的贡献。正如斯坦内奇所坚信的那样,地方历史通常是一种民主现象,允许各种不同的研究方法。历史上的社会之所以能够生存和发展,是因为它们牢固地建立在自己的社区基础上。也许更重要的是,当地历史协会经常发掘和记录的过去的数据帮助澳大利亚人塑造了斯坦纳奇所恰当描述的“为自己的身份目的而创造的历史”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
‘Welcome to the Anthropocene’ The Memorial Afterlives of Online Crowdsourcing A New Zeal for History: For a New International Public History Public History, National Museums and Transnational History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1