‘Real Photos’: Transforming Tindale and the Postcolonial Archive

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY Public History Review Pub Date : 2016-12-30 DOI:10.5130/PHRJ.V23I0.5329
Jane Lydon
{"title":"‘Real Photos’: Transforming Tindale and the Postcolonial Archive","authors":"Jane Lydon","doi":"10.5130/PHRJ.V23I0.5329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the Transforming Tindale exhibition opened at the State Library of Queensland in September 2012, there was much excitement and goodwill. This landmark exhibition was curated by Michael Aird and featured Ah Kee’s drawings and enlarged prints of anthropologist Norman Tindale’s photographs of 1938-1940, as well as extensive archival information and stories from the subjects themselves and their relatives. The transformations of the exhibition’s title refer to the way Tindale’s ‘data’ was given both new physical form, as well as engendering and renewing social meanings. Scholars such as Elizabeth Edwards have argued that we should explore the materiality of images and the diverse forms they assume, attending to the ways their form and vitality shape us as much as we imbue them with meaning. Digitisation constitutes a major transformation of photographs’ historical accumulation of materiality. It also enables the return of historical archives from European museums to Indigenous relatives in Australia. In this article I explore the relations and narratives that emerge from this process, focusing on their Indigenous significance, and using the example of an enigmatic cardboard panel held by the Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford on which are mounted thirteen photographs from South Australia. For Indigenous descendants of the people recorded in these photographs, their physical form is less important than the way they embody missing relatives, lost through invasion and assimilation. This process is slow and often awkward, but the rewards are great, in challenging foundational national histories, re-connecting family networks, and telling the truth of Indigenous experience.","PeriodicalId":41934,"journal":{"name":"Public History Review","volume":"23 1","pages":"56-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5130/PHRJ.V23I0.5329","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/PHRJ.V23I0.5329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When the Transforming Tindale exhibition opened at the State Library of Queensland in September 2012, there was much excitement and goodwill. This landmark exhibition was curated by Michael Aird and featured Ah Kee’s drawings and enlarged prints of anthropologist Norman Tindale’s photographs of 1938-1940, as well as extensive archival information and stories from the subjects themselves and their relatives. The transformations of the exhibition’s title refer to the way Tindale’s ‘data’ was given both new physical form, as well as engendering and renewing social meanings. Scholars such as Elizabeth Edwards have argued that we should explore the materiality of images and the diverse forms they assume, attending to the ways their form and vitality shape us as much as we imbue them with meaning. Digitisation constitutes a major transformation of photographs’ historical accumulation of materiality. It also enables the return of historical archives from European museums to Indigenous relatives in Australia. In this article I explore the relations and narratives that emerge from this process, focusing on their Indigenous significance, and using the example of an enigmatic cardboard panel held by the Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford on which are mounted thirteen photographs from South Australia. For Indigenous descendants of the people recorded in these photographs, their physical form is less important than the way they embody missing relatives, lost through invasion and assimilation. This process is slow and often awkward, but the rewards are great, in challenging foundational national histories, re-connecting family networks, and telling the truth of Indigenous experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“真实照片”:改变廷代尔和后殖民档案
2012年9月,当《廷代尔的转变》展览在昆士兰州立图书馆开幕时,现场充满了兴奋和善意。这个具有里程碑意义的展览由Michael Aird策划,展出了阿记的绘画和放大的人类学家Norman Tindale 1938-1940年的照片,以及大量的档案信息和主题本身及其亲属的故事。展览标题的转变是指廷代尔的“数据”被赋予新的物理形式,以及产生和更新社会意义的方式。伊丽莎白·爱德华兹(Elizabeth Edwards)等学者认为,我们应该探索图像的物质性和它们所呈现的各种形式,关注它们的形式和活力如何塑造我们,就像我们赋予它们意义一样。数字化构成了照片的物质性历史积累的重大转变。它还使欧洲博物馆的历史档案能够归还给澳大利亚的土著亲属。在这篇文章中,我探讨了这一过程中出现的关系和叙述,重点关注它们的土著意义,并以牛津皮特河博物馆收藏的一个神秘的纸板为例,上面挂着十三张来自南澳大利亚的照片。对于这些照片中记录的土著居民的后代来说,他们的身体形态并不重要,重要的是他们体现了因入侵和同化而失去的亲人的方式。这个过程是缓慢的,往往是尴尬的,但回报是巨大的,在挑战国家的基础历史,重新连接家庭网络,并讲述土著经验的真相。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Memorial Afterlives of Online Crowdsourcing A New Zeal for History: For a New International Public History Public History, National Museums and Transnational History Prosuming History in China: a Paradigm Shift
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1