The quality of audit recommendation: The effect of role conflict, role ambiguity and work stress

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Accounting Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5267/j.ac.2021.11.002
Meinarni Asnawi
{"title":"The quality of audit recommendation: The effect of role conflict, role ambiguity and work stress","authors":"Meinarni Asnawi","doi":"10.5267/j.ac.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the effects of role conflict and role ambiguity on internal auditor's work stress and the quality of audit recommendations. These relationships were tested based on the survey taken from 96 internal auditors who served at several state universities in Indonesia. The hypothesis testing technique used SmartPLS analysis. The results showed that role conflict has a positive effect on the quality of audit recommendations while role ambiguity has a negative effect. Role conflict and role ambiguity have a positive and significant effect on work stress. Other test results show that internal auditor work stress does not show an effect on the quality of audit recommendations. The practical implication of this research is that to reduce ambiguity in carrying out audit tasks and to improve the quality of audit recommendations, it is necessary to consider an adequate work environment, especially the availability and adequacy of information needed by internal auditors in completing monitoring tasks. The role of conflict due to the presence of more than one task can cause work stress, although it does not interfere with the quality of audit recommendations. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the allocation of work time that is not carried out at the same time so that the workload causes work stress.","PeriodicalId":7317,"journal":{"name":"Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the effects of role conflict and role ambiguity on internal auditor's work stress and the quality of audit recommendations. These relationships were tested based on the survey taken from 96 internal auditors who served at several state universities in Indonesia. The hypothesis testing technique used SmartPLS analysis. The results showed that role conflict has a positive effect on the quality of audit recommendations while role ambiguity has a negative effect. Role conflict and role ambiguity have a positive and significant effect on work stress. Other test results show that internal auditor work stress does not show an effect on the quality of audit recommendations. The practical implication of this research is that to reduce ambiguity in carrying out audit tasks and to improve the quality of audit recommendations, it is necessary to consider an adequate work environment, especially the availability and adequacy of information needed by internal auditors in completing monitoring tasks. The role of conflict due to the presence of more than one task can cause work stress, although it does not interfere with the quality of audit recommendations. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the allocation of work time that is not carried out at the same time so that the workload causes work stress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计建议质量:角色冲突、角色模糊和工作压力的影响
本研究考察了角色冲突和角色模糊对内部审计师工作压力和审计建议质量的影响。根据对96名在印尼几所州立大学任职的内部审计师的调查,这些关系得到了检验。假设检验技术采用SmartPLS分析。结果表明,角色冲突对审计建议质量有积极影响,而角色模糊对审计建议质量有消极影响。角色冲突和角色模糊对工作压力有显著的正向影响。其他测试结果表明,内审员的工作压力对审计建议的质量没有影响。本研究的实际含义是,为了减少执行审计任务的模糊性,提高审计建议的质量,必须考虑适当的工作环境,特别是内部审计师在完成监测任务时所需信息的可得性和充分性。由于存在多个任务而产生的冲突作用可能会造成工作压力,尽管它不会影响审计建议的质量。因此,要注意不同时进行的工作时间分配,以免工作量过大造成工作压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting
Accounting Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric analysis of risk measures for portfolio optimization The effects of customer relationship management, service quality and relationship marketing on customer retention: The mediation role of bank customer retention in Indonesia Money laundering conviction rate and capital formation in Nigeria The risk premium in times of financial crisis: an assessment from ICAPM on the MENA region Basel accord capital regulations and financial risk management: Empirical evidence from Pakistan’s financial institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1