A comparative study of the quality of sandcrete cement blocks and quarry dust cement blocks

Q2 Materials Science Engineering Solid Mechanics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5267/J.ESM.2021.3.002
R. Lumor, Lawrence Abladey, D. Tikoli, Alfred Gand, Ezekiel Osei Owusu, K. Offei-Nyako, I. E. Edim
{"title":"A comparative study of the quality of sandcrete cement blocks and quarry dust cement blocks","authors":"R. Lumor, Lawrence Abladey, D. Tikoli, Alfred Gand, Ezekiel Osei Owusu, K. Offei-Nyako, I. E. Edim","doi":"10.5267/J.ESM.2021.3.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increase of construction activities in Ghana, there is an increasing demand in building materials leading to the shortage of the conventional materials. The informal sector is gradually seeing the introduction of quarry dust as a substitute of sand in block production. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis of the quality of sandcrete blocks and quarry dust cement blocks. Block samples were gathered from various suppliers around the Prampram and Dawhenya areas and through various laboratory tests were tested for their dimension tolerance, water absorption and compressive strengths. Aggregate samples were also taken from suppliers for sieve analyses. The study revealed that the quarry dust cement blocks contained relatively higher percentages of coarse grade particles compared to the sandcrete blocks. The total average water absorption of sandcrete blocks was found to be 3.90% while quarry dust showed an improved value of 3.28%. Sandcrete blocks were averagely found to be of a higher compressive strength of 4.31N/mm2, with quarry dust at 3.0N/mm2. The study suggested the likelihood of a lesser use of cement in the production of quarry dust cement blocks due to the similarities in colour between the quarry dust and cement, hence, negatively affecting its compressive strength.","PeriodicalId":37952,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Solid Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Solid Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/J.ESM.2021.3.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the increase of construction activities in Ghana, there is an increasing demand in building materials leading to the shortage of the conventional materials. The informal sector is gradually seeing the introduction of quarry dust as a substitute of sand in block production. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis of the quality of sandcrete blocks and quarry dust cement blocks. Block samples were gathered from various suppliers around the Prampram and Dawhenya areas and through various laboratory tests were tested for their dimension tolerance, water absorption and compressive strengths. Aggregate samples were also taken from suppliers for sieve analyses. The study revealed that the quarry dust cement blocks contained relatively higher percentages of coarse grade particles compared to the sandcrete blocks. The total average water absorption of sandcrete blocks was found to be 3.90% while quarry dust showed an improved value of 3.28%. Sandcrete blocks were averagely found to be of a higher compressive strength of 4.31N/mm2, with quarry dust at 3.0N/mm2. The study suggested the likelihood of a lesser use of cement in the production of quarry dust cement blocks due to the similarities in colour between the quarry dust and cement, hence, negatively affecting its compressive strength.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
砂混凝土水泥砌块与采石场粉尘水泥砌块质量的比较研究
随着加纳建筑活动的增加,对建筑材料的需求不断增加,导致传统材料的短缺。非正式部门逐渐看到采石场粉尘作为块状生产中沙子的替代品。本文着重对砂石混凝土砌块与采石场粉尘水泥砌块的质量进行了对比分析。从Prampram和Dawhenya地区周围的不同供应商处收集了砌块样品,并通过各种实验室测试测试了它们的尺寸公差、吸水率和抗压强度。还从供应商处采集骨料样品进行筛分分析。研究表明,采石场粉尘水泥块与砂混凝土块相比,含有相对较高的粗级颗粒百分比。砂混凝土砌块的总平均吸水率为3.90%,采石场粉尘的吸水率提高了3.28%。砂混凝土块的平均抗压强度为4.31N/mm2,采石场粉尘的抗压强度为3.0N/mm2。该研究表明,由于采石场粉尘和水泥的颜色相似,因此在采石场粉尘水泥块的生产中较少使用水泥的可能性,因此对其抗压强度产生了负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Solid Mechanics
Engineering Solid Mechanics Materials Science-Metals and Alloys
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Engineering Solid Mechanics (ESM) is an online international journal for publishing high quality peer reviewed papers in the field of theoretical and applied solid mechanics. The primary focus is to exchange ideas about investigating behavior and properties of engineering materials (such as metals, composites, ceramics, polymers, FGMs, rocks and concretes, asphalt mixtures, bio and nano materials) and their mechanical characterization (including strength and deformation behavior, fatigue and fracture, stress measurements, etc.) through experimental, theoretical and numerical research studies. Researchers and practitioners (from deferent areas such as mechanical and manufacturing, aerospace, railway, bio-mechanics, civil and mining, materials and metallurgy, oil, gas and petroleum industries, pipeline, marine and offshore sectors) are encouraged to submit their original, unpublished contributions.
期刊最新文献
Combined hardening parameters of high strength steel under low cycle fatigue Design modification and performance evaluation of mini-hydrostatic pressure apparatus for inclined plane circular surface Comparison of different supervised machine learning algorithms for bead geometry prediction in GMAW process Impact of thickness, void content, temperature and loading rate on tensile fracture toughness and work of fracture of asphalt mixtures- An experimental study using the SCB test Experimental study on the behavior of polyamide multifilament subject to impact loads under different soaking conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1