Optimization of wire type and current welding on the strength of welding connection in two types of material testing via response surface methodology

Q2 Materials Science Engineering Solid Mechanics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5267/j.esm.2022.6.004
H. Riyanto, S. Sugito, Abdul Fikri
{"title":"Optimization of wire type and current welding on the strength of welding connection in two types of material testing via response surface methodology","authors":"H. Riyanto, S. Sugito, Abdul Fikri","doi":"10.5267/j.esm.2022.6.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of types of wire welding that circulate on the market and the development of welding technology, especially related to current welding, create a lack of information related to the quality of welding results for several types of materials. This can cause the strength of the welding connection to not be maximized. Therefore, this study aims to optimize the use of three types of wire welding and three current welding on the strength of the welding connection in two types of material testing using the response surface methodology. Box-Behnken, coupled with the RSM and the desirability function, was used to optimize the strength of the welding connection of the wire types (RD-46, LB-52, and RB-26), and current welding (100, 130, and 160 A) against two types of material testing (IWF-150 and ASTM-A517-G70). The strength of the welding connection observed in response included the tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in the welding metal and the hardness values in the main metal. Optimization of the strength of the welding connection in this study recommends the application of wire types RB-26, current welding of 100 A, and ASTM-A517-G70 material testing with the highest desirability value of 71.6%. Optimization of tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in welding metal, and hardness values in main metal by applying this parameter are 575.64 MPa, 110.69 J, 216.75 (HV10) and 126.6 (HV10), respectively. The results proved that an appropriate welding connection strength could be achieved using wire welding types and current welding in material testing.","PeriodicalId":37952,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Solid Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Solid Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.esm.2022.6.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of types of wire welding that circulate on the market and the development of welding technology, especially related to current welding, create a lack of information related to the quality of welding results for several types of materials. This can cause the strength of the welding connection to not be maximized. Therefore, this study aims to optimize the use of three types of wire welding and three current welding on the strength of the welding connection in two types of material testing using the response surface methodology. Box-Behnken, coupled with the RSM and the desirability function, was used to optimize the strength of the welding connection of the wire types (RD-46, LB-52, and RB-26), and current welding (100, 130, and 160 A) against two types of material testing (IWF-150 and ASTM-A517-G70). The strength of the welding connection observed in response included the tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in the welding metal and the hardness values in the main metal. Optimization of the strength of the welding connection in this study recommends the application of wire types RB-26, current welding of 100 A, and ASTM-A517-G70 material testing with the highest desirability value of 71.6%. Optimization of tensile strength, Charpy impact-absorbed energy, hardness values in welding metal, and hardness values in main metal by applying this parameter are 575.64 MPa, 110.69 J, 216.75 (HV10) and 126.6 (HV10), respectively. The results proved that an appropriate welding connection strength could be achieved using wire welding types and current welding in material testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化焊丝类型和焊接电流对两种材料焊接连接强度的影响,采用响应面法进行测试
市场上流通的焊丝焊接类型的数量和焊接技术的发展,特别是与当前焊接有关的技术,造成了几种材料焊接结果质量相关信息的缺乏。这可能导致焊接连接的强度不能最大化。因此,本研究旨在利用响应面法优化利用三种焊丝焊接和三种电流焊接对两种材料的焊接连接强度进行测试。Box-Behnken结合RSM和可取性函数,针对两种材料测试(IWF-150和ASTM-A517-G70),对焊丝类型(RD-46、LB-52和RB-26)和电流焊接(100、130和160 A)的焊接连接强度进行了优化。在响应中观察到的焊接连接强度包括抗拉强度、夏比冲击吸收能、焊接金属的硬度值和主金属的硬度值。本研究推荐采用焊丝型号RB-26,焊接电流为100 A, ASTM-A517-G70材料试验,理想值最高为71.6%。应用该参数优化得到的抗拉强度、夏比冲击吸收能、焊接金属硬度和主金属硬度分别为575.64 MPa、110.69 J、216.75 (HV10)和126.6 (HV10)。结果表明,在材料试验中,采用线焊方式和电流焊方式均可获得合适的焊接连接强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Solid Mechanics
Engineering Solid Mechanics Materials Science-Metals and Alloys
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Engineering Solid Mechanics (ESM) is an online international journal for publishing high quality peer reviewed papers in the field of theoretical and applied solid mechanics. The primary focus is to exchange ideas about investigating behavior and properties of engineering materials (such as metals, composites, ceramics, polymers, FGMs, rocks and concretes, asphalt mixtures, bio and nano materials) and their mechanical characterization (including strength and deformation behavior, fatigue and fracture, stress measurements, etc.) through experimental, theoretical and numerical research studies. Researchers and practitioners (from deferent areas such as mechanical and manufacturing, aerospace, railway, bio-mechanics, civil and mining, materials and metallurgy, oil, gas and petroleum industries, pipeline, marine and offshore sectors) are encouraged to submit their original, unpublished contributions.
期刊最新文献
Combined hardening parameters of high strength steel under low cycle fatigue Design modification and performance evaluation of mini-hydrostatic pressure apparatus for inclined plane circular surface Comparison of different supervised machine learning algorithms for bead geometry prediction in GMAW process Impact of thickness, void content, temperature and loading rate on tensile fracture toughness and work of fracture of asphalt mixtures- An experimental study using the SCB test Experimental study on the behavior of polyamide multifilament subject to impact loads under different soaking conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1