Perception of Scary Halloween Masks by Zoo Animals and Humans

J. Sinnott, H. Speaker, Laura Powell, K. Mosteller
{"title":"Perception of Scary Halloween Masks by Zoo Animals and Humans","authors":"J. Sinnott, H. Speaker, Laura Powell, K. Mosteller","doi":"10.5070/P4252020209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Sinnott, Joan M.; Speaker, H. Anton; Powell, Laura A.; Mosteller, Kelly W. | Abstract: Zoo animals were tested to see if they perceived the scary nature of Halloween masks, using a procedure that measured the avoidance response latency to take food from a masked human experimenter. Human perception of the masks was also assessed using a rating scale, with results showing that a Bill Clinton mask was rated not scary, while a Vampire mask was rated very scary. Animal results showed that primate latencies correlated significantly with the human ratings, while non-primate latencies did not. Taken together, these results indicate that human perception of scary faces does not depend upon human-specific cultural factors, e.g., belief in the supernatural. Rather, it has a more biological basis, shared specifically with other primates, by which scary faces are perceived as predators or threatening conspecifics.","PeriodicalId":39712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/P4252020209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Author(s): Sinnott, Joan M.; Speaker, H. Anton; Powell, Laura A.; Mosteller, Kelly W. | Abstract: Zoo animals were tested to see if they perceived the scary nature of Halloween masks, using a procedure that measured the avoidance response latency to take food from a masked human experimenter. Human perception of the masks was also assessed using a rating scale, with results showing that a Bill Clinton mask was rated not scary, while a Vampire mask was rated very scary. Animal results showed that primate latencies correlated significantly with the human ratings, while non-primate latencies did not. Taken together, these results indicate that human perception of scary faces does not depend upon human-specific cultural factors, e.g., belief in the supernatural. Rather, it has a more biological basis, shared specifically with other primates, by which scary faces are perceived as predators or threatening conspecifics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动物园动物和人类对恐怖万圣节面具的看法
作者:Sinnott, Joan M.;演讲者,H.安东;劳拉·a·鲍威尔;摘要:研究人员对动物园动物进行了一项测试,以观察它们是否感知到万圣节面具的恐怖性质,测试方法是测量从戴面具的人类实验者那里拿走食物的回避反应延迟。人类对面具的感知也用评级量表进行了评估,结果显示,比尔·克林顿的面具被评为不可怕,而吸血鬼面具被评为非常可怕。动物实验结果表明,灵长类动物的潜伏期与人类的评分显著相关,而非灵长类动物的潜伏期则没有。综上所述,这些结果表明,人类对恐怖面孔的感知并不取决于人类特有的文化因素,例如,对超自然现象的信仰。更确切地说,它有更多的生物学基础,与其他灵长类动物特别相似,恐怖的面孔被认为是掠食者或具有威胁性的同种动物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Probable Play Behavior in a Surgeonfish (Naso vlamingii ) A Case Study of Spontaneous Category Formation and Behavioral Expression in a Language-Trained Steller Sea Lion Eumetopias jubatus Effortful foraging activity for uncertain food in pigeons Do belugas send sound cues? -Experimental verification of blindfolded imitation among beluga- Comparison of Paired- and Multiple-Stimulus Preference Assessments using a Runway Task by Dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1