The Difficulties in Implementing the Compulsory Vaccination Regulation to Vaccine Opponents During the Reign of Abdülhamid II

H. Sari, Hatice Nil Sari
{"title":"The Difficulties in Implementing the Compulsory Vaccination Regulation to Vaccine Opponents During the Reign of Abdülhamid II","authors":"H. Sari, Hatice Nil Sari","doi":"10.5336/mdethic.2022-92453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT With the vaccination regulations published successively in 1885, 1894 and 1904 the legal framework of the compulsory smallpox vaccination was drawn. The aim of this study is to determine from the archive documents of the period the difficulty faced by the government in the application of compulsory vaccination and the official ap- proach to the solution of vaccine opposition. Official writings between 1885-1905 in the context of resolving the opposition to vaccination were searched for in the Prime Ministry Ottoman archives. Auxiliary sources were consulted for the interpretation of the expressions. With the aim of resolving opposition to mandatory vaccination, support was requested from religious community leaders; the benefits of the vac- cine was publicized through newspapers; residents of every district were encouraged to report those who are not vaccinated to the official authorities. One of the biggest problems faced was that children were not vaccinated. Some of those who did not want to be vaccinated even changed their address. The applicability of the penalties foreseen in the regulations for those who do not get vaccinated was the main subject of discussion. By 1905, opposition to vaccination seems to have continued in certain regions of Istanbul. From an ethical point of view, compul- sory vaccination aimed to protect public health conflicted with the will of those who were against the vaccine. However, it was noticed during the implementation process that the penalties stipulated in the regulation for those who do not want to be vaccinated do not guarantee vac- cination.","PeriodicalId":91422,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye klinikleri. Tip etigi-hukuku-tarihi = Turkiye klinikleri journal of medical ethics, law, and history","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye klinikleri. Tip etigi-hukuku-tarihi = Turkiye klinikleri journal of medical ethics, law, and history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/mdethic.2022-92453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABS TRACT With the vaccination regulations published successively in 1885, 1894 and 1904 the legal framework of the compulsory smallpox vaccination was drawn. The aim of this study is to determine from the archive documents of the period the difficulty faced by the government in the application of compulsory vaccination and the official ap- proach to the solution of vaccine opposition. Official writings between 1885-1905 in the context of resolving the opposition to vaccination were searched for in the Prime Ministry Ottoman archives. Auxiliary sources were consulted for the interpretation of the expressions. With the aim of resolving opposition to mandatory vaccination, support was requested from religious community leaders; the benefits of the vac- cine was publicized through newspapers; residents of every district were encouraged to report those who are not vaccinated to the official authorities. One of the biggest problems faced was that children were not vaccinated. Some of those who did not want to be vaccinated even changed their address. The applicability of the penalties foreseen in the regulations for those who do not get vaccinated was the main subject of discussion. By 1905, opposition to vaccination seems to have continued in certain regions of Istanbul. From an ethical point of view, compul- sory vaccination aimed to protect public health conflicted with the will of those who were against the vaccine. However, it was noticed during the implementation process that the penalties stipulated in the regulation for those who do not want to be vaccinated do not guarantee vac- cination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿卜杜勒-阿卜杜勒-哈米德二世统治时期对疫苗反对者实施强制接种规定的困难
随着1885年、1894年和1904年相继发布的疫苗接种条例,强制性天花疫苗接种的法律框架被绘制出来。本研究的目的,是要从这一时期的档案文件中,确定政府在实施强制疫苗接种时所面临的困难,以及解决疫苗反对的官方途径。1885年至1905年间,在解决反对接种疫苗的背景下的官方著作被搜索到奥斯曼帝国总理档案馆。为了解释这些表述,查阅了辅助资料。为了消除对强制性疫苗接种的反对,要求宗教社区领袖提供支持;通过报纸宣传疫苗的好处;鼓励各区居民向官方当局报告未接种疫苗的人。面临的最大问题之一是儿童没有接种疫苗。一些不想接种疫苗的人甚至改变了他们的地址。讨论的主要议题是,条例中预见的对未接种疫苗者的处罚是否适用。到1905年,反对接种疫苗的声音似乎在伊斯坦布尔的某些地区继续存在。从伦理的角度来看,旨在保护公众健康的强制性疫苗接种与那些反对疫苗的人的意愿相冲突。然而,在实施过程中,人们注意到,条例中规定的对那些不想接种疫苗的人的处罚并不能保证接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Lack of Providing the Patient with Satisfactory and Reliable Information About Imported Medicines in Terms of Safety and Ethical Problems: Qualitative Research Examining Supreme Court and State Council Decisions on Medical Errors: Content Analysis Violations of Privacy in Hospitals: Traditional Review Postmodernism, COVID-19 Pandemic, and Life of Nurses:Boundaries of Individual Rights and Social Responsibilities:Systematic Review An Ethical Evaluation of Informed Consent Forms Related with Down Syndrome: Traditional Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1