Between 250 years of free information and 20 years of EU and Internet

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS Etikk I Praksis Pub Date : 2016-05-09 DOI:10.5324/EIP.V10I1.1950
Inger Österdahl
{"title":"Between 250 years of free information and 20 years of EU and Internet","authors":"Inger Österdahl","doi":"10.5324/EIP.V10I1.1950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right of access to documents is constitutionally based in Sweden and has a long history. The right of access is considered crucial to Swedish democracy.  On entering the EU in 1995, Sweden declared that public access to official records forms part of Sweden’s constitutional, political and cultural heritage.  The members of the EU for their part declared that they took it for granted that Sweden would fully comply with Community, now Union, law with respect to openness and transparency. Sweden continues to push for transparency when EU legislation potentially containing secrecy clauses is negotiated in the EU.  It turns out, however, that the EU membership does pose challenges to the strong Swedish right of access to documents. The protection of personal data is controversial in Sweden to the extent that the stricter EU legislation clashes with the traditionally weak protection of privacy in Swedish law; the right of access to information has largely overridden the right to privacy. Large amounts of publicly available personal data, amassed in data bases by private actors, for commercial reasons but under the protection of the Swedish constitution, is causing problems especially since the Swedish constitutional law is considered, by Sweden, to precede EU legislation in the field. Sweden will somehow have to solve the dilemmas caused by the differing traditions of transparency between itself and other members of the EU and of other international organizations. Many answers – perhaps converging - will be provided in 2016 by Swedish official inquiries and the EU Regulation. Article first published online: 22 MARCH 2016","PeriodicalId":42362,"journal":{"name":"Etikk I Praksis","volume":"10 1","pages":"27-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etikk I Praksis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/EIP.V10I1.1950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The right of access to documents is constitutionally based in Sweden and has a long history. The right of access is considered crucial to Swedish democracy.  On entering the EU in 1995, Sweden declared that public access to official records forms part of Sweden’s constitutional, political and cultural heritage.  The members of the EU for their part declared that they took it for granted that Sweden would fully comply with Community, now Union, law with respect to openness and transparency. Sweden continues to push for transparency when EU legislation potentially containing secrecy clauses is negotiated in the EU.  It turns out, however, that the EU membership does pose challenges to the strong Swedish right of access to documents. The protection of personal data is controversial in Sweden to the extent that the stricter EU legislation clashes with the traditionally weak protection of privacy in Swedish law; the right of access to information has largely overridden the right to privacy. Large amounts of publicly available personal data, amassed in data bases by private actors, for commercial reasons but under the protection of the Swedish constitution, is causing problems especially since the Swedish constitutional law is considered, by Sweden, to precede EU legislation in the field. Sweden will somehow have to solve the dilemmas caused by the differing traditions of transparency between itself and other members of the EU and of other international organizations. Many answers – perhaps converging - will be provided in 2016 by Swedish official inquiries and the EU Regulation. Article first published online: 22 MARCH 2016
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
250年的免费信息和20年的欧盟和互联网
查阅文件的权利是瑞典宪法规定的,有着悠久的历史。访问权被认为对瑞典民主至关重要。在1995年加入欧盟时,瑞典宣布,对官方记录的公开访问是瑞典宪法、政治和文化遗产的一部分。欧盟成员国则宣布,他们理所当然地认为瑞典将完全遵守欧共体,现在是欧盟关于公开性和透明度的法律。当欧盟就可能包含保密条款的立法进行谈判时,瑞典继续推动透明度。然而,事实证明,欧盟成员国身份确实对瑞典获取文件的强大权利构成了挑战。个人数据的保护在瑞典是有争议的,因为欧盟更严格的立法与瑞典法律中传统上薄弱的隐私保护相冲突;获取信息的权利在很大程度上压倒了隐私权。由于商业原因,私人行为者在瑞典宪法的保护下,在数据库中积累了大量可公开获得的个人数据,这造成了问题,特别是因为瑞典认为瑞典宪法先于欧盟在这一领域的立法。瑞典将在某种程度上必须解决它与欧盟其他成员国和其他国际组织之间不同的透明度传统所造成的困境。2016年,瑞典官方调查和欧盟法规将提供许多答案——或许会趋同。文章首次在线发布:2016年3月22日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Etikk I Praksis
Etikk I Praksis Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ethical challenges of social work in Spain during COVID-19 LGBTIQ+ prioritization in refugee admissions – The case of Norway Stakeholder Inclusion as the Research Council of Norway’s Silver Bullet Moral sensitivity, moral distress and moral functioning Nazism, Genocide and the Threat of The Global West. Russian Moral Justification of War in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1