The Relationship Between Drain Removal Day and Breast Weight in Patients with Breast Cancer After Mastectomy: A Retrospective Study

Ş. Dokcu, M. Çaparlar, Özhan Çetindağ, A. Eroğlu
{"title":"The Relationship Between Drain Removal Day and Breast Weight in Patients with Breast Cancer After Mastectomy: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Ş. Dokcu, M. Çaparlar, Özhan Çetindağ, A. Eroğlu","doi":"10.5336/medsci.2021-84896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT Objective: Surgeries performed for breast cancer often include wide flap practices and breast tissue resections. This condition paves the way for bothersome complications such as seroma, which neg- atively affect patient comfort and also require hospitalization. Hence, surgeons have adopted postoperative drain application as an indispens- able routine. In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between the weight of resected breast tissue after mastectomy and the postoper- ative drain removal time. Material and Methods: Retrospective medical records of 107 patients who underwent mastectomy procedures due to breast cancer in the surgical oncology clinic were exported from the hospital database. Statistical analyzes were performed within the confi- dence interval of 95%. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the patients was 55.13, mean body mass index was 28, mean day of drain removal was 8.45, mean number of lymph nodes removed was 12. Only 47% of the patients had metastatic lymph nodes, with an average of 4.6. We found that the time of drain removal was longer in patients who underwent modified radi- cal mastectomy (MRM) and had axillary lymphatic involvement (p=0.00). In the correlation analysis performed, there was a positive cor- relation between postoperative drain removal time and breast weight (p=0.00), the total number of lymph nodes removed (p=0.00), number of metastatic lymph nodes (p=0.04), and body mass index (p=0.004). Conclusion: Our results are consistent with the current literature, and we recommend being more persistent for drainage practice in patients with axillary involvement, who are overweight and have large breast vol- umes, and not ignoring individual risks in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":49403,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisi","volume":"233 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2021-84896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABS TRACT Objective: Surgeries performed for breast cancer often include wide flap practices and breast tissue resections. This condition paves the way for bothersome complications such as seroma, which neg- atively affect patient comfort and also require hospitalization. Hence, surgeons have adopted postoperative drain application as an indispens- able routine. In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between the weight of resected breast tissue after mastectomy and the postoper- ative drain removal time. Material and Methods: Retrospective medical records of 107 patients who underwent mastectomy procedures due to breast cancer in the surgical oncology clinic were exported from the hospital database. Statistical analyzes were performed within the confi- dence interval of 95%. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the patients was 55.13, mean body mass index was 28, mean day of drain removal was 8.45, mean number of lymph nodes removed was 12. Only 47% of the patients had metastatic lymph nodes, with an average of 4.6. We found that the time of drain removal was longer in patients who underwent modified radi- cal mastectomy (MRM) and had axillary lymphatic involvement (p=0.00). In the correlation analysis performed, there was a positive cor- relation between postoperative drain removal time and breast weight (p=0.00), the total number of lymph nodes removed (p=0.00), number of metastatic lymph nodes (p=0.04), and body mass index (p=0.004). Conclusion: Our results are consistent with the current literature, and we recommend being more persistent for drainage practice in patients with axillary involvement, who are overweight and have large breast vol- umes, and not ignoring individual risks in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺切除术后乳腺癌患者引流日与乳房重量的关系:一项回顾性研究
目的:乳腺癌的手术通常包括宽瓣手术和乳腺组织切除。这种情况为令人烦恼的并发症(如血肿)铺平了道路,这会对患者的舒适度产生负面影响,也需要住院治疗。因此,外科医生已将术后引流液应用作为不可缺少的常规。在这项研究中,我们的目的是研究乳房切除术后切除的乳房组织的重量与术后引流时间之间的关系。材料和方法:从医院数据库导出肿瘤外科门诊107例因乳腺癌行乳房切除术患者的回顾性病历。在95%的置信区间内进行统计学分析。p值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:患者平均年龄55.13岁,平均体重指数28,平均引流天数8.45天,平均淋巴结清扫数12个。只有47%的患者有转移性淋巴结,平均为4.6%。我们发现行改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)且腋窝淋巴受损伤的患者引流时间较长(p=0.00)。在相关分析中,术后引流时间与乳房体重(p=0.00)、淋巴结清扫总数(p=0.00)、淋巴结转移数(p=0.04)、体重指数(p=0.004)呈正相关。结论:我们的研究结果与目前的文献一致,我们建议在累及腋窝、超重和乳房体积大的患者中进行更持久的引流练习,在临床实践中不要忽视个体风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Medical Interns' Perceptions and Attitudes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study Assessment of Assistant Physicians' Competencies for Making Accurate Diagnosis with Agreement Coefficients: A Methodological Study The Effect of Scenario-Based High Fidelity Simulation Training on Autonomy Levels, Team Collaboration and Problem Solving Ability of Last Grade Nursing and Medical Students: Experimental Study Evaluation of Cases with Rabies Risk Contact Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Two-Year Analysis: A Two-Year Analysis, Analytical Research Motivation of Specialist Doctors in Türkiye to Conduct Scientific Research: A Descriptive Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1