Complications from Pulmonary Contusions after Rib Plating: A Case Series and Lessons Learned

M. Tumminello, Alison A Smith, Patrick R. McGrew, Anna Meade, Chrissy Guidry, Clifton Mcginness, J. Duchesne, P. Greiffenstein
{"title":"Complications from Pulmonary Contusions after Rib Plating: A Case Series and Lessons Learned","authors":"M. Tumminello, Alison A Smith, Patrick R. McGrew, Anna Meade, Chrissy Guidry, Clifton Mcginness, J. Duchesne, P. Greiffenstein","doi":"10.4103/jctt.jctt_17_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is increasing in popularity with low reported complication rates. Pulmonary contusion (PC) has been cited as a relative contraindication to SSRF in cases of patients with respiratory failure due to chest wall injury. However, the reported experience and clinical data regarding PC on this topic remain limited. The objective of this study was to describe the experience treating patients with moderate-to-severe PCs utilizing SSRF and identify risk factors for pulmonary complications postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: The trauma registry of a Level 1 trauma center was reviewed from 2015 to 2019, and patients who underwent SSRF were assessed. Computed tomography was examined, and PC score was calculated in patients with a documented PC by a researcher and verified by a board-certified radiologist using the PC score as described by Chen et al. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were analyzed and reported. Results: Ninety-two patients were included in the initial analysis as having undergone SSRF in the study period. The patients were 72.8% male and averaged 5.5 ± 4.4 days from admission to SSRF. Nine patients with severe chest trauma and PCs underwent SSRF. Of these patients, four had severe bilateral PCs and five had severe unilateral PC, totaling >20% of total lung capacity. Three patients had ipsilateral moderate-to-severe PCs with traumatic pneumatoceles. They underwent SSRF within 48 h of admission per standard practice. They were all placed in the lateral decubitus position with the affected side up. Their intraoperative courses were complicated by bloody secretions present in the endotracheal tubes. Only one patient had lung isolation using dual-lumen endotracheal intubation and had an uneventful perioperative course. Postoperatively, the other two patients developed severe ARDS that required mechanical ventilation for several days, significantly complicating their recovery. Discussion: This case series highlights the relative risk of SSRF in patients with significant PC. Early SSRF in patients with PC ≥3 was associated with ARDS when patients did not undergo intraoperative lung isolation. In two patients with severe PC, the contusions themselves did not produce respiratory failure on admission; however, intraoperative positioning resulted in the aspiration of bloody secretions from the contused lung into the unaffected lung, causing severe postoperative ARDS. Suggested measures to prevent future events may include isolating the contused lung intraoperatively or delaying SSRF until contusion has resolved, if feasible.","PeriodicalId":92962,"journal":{"name":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","volume":"4 1","pages":"35 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jctt.jctt_17_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is increasing in popularity with low reported complication rates. Pulmonary contusion (PC) has been cited as a relative contraindication to SSRF in cases of patients with respiratory failure due to chest wall injury. However, the reported experience and clinical data regarding PC on this topic remain limited. The objective of this study was to describe the experience treating patients with moderate-to-severe PCs utilizing SSRF and identify risk factors for pulmonary complications postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: The trauma registry of a Level 1 trauma center was reviewed from 2015 to 2019, and patients who underwent SSRF were assessed. Computed tomography was examined, and PC score was calculated in patients with a documented PC by a researcher and verified by a board-certified radiologist using the PC score as described by Chen et al. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were analyzed and reported. Results: Ninety-two patients were included in the initial analysis as having undergone SSRF in the study period. The patients were 72.8% male and averaged 5.5 ± 4.4 days from admission to SSRF. Nine patients with severe chest trauma and PCs underwent SSRF. Of these patients, four had severe bilateral PCs and five had severe unilateral PC, totaling >20% of total lung capacity. Three patients had ipsilateral moderate-to-severe PCs with traumatic pneumatoceles. They underwent SSRF within 48 h of admission per standard practice. They were all placed in the lateral decubitus position with the affected side up. Their intraoperative courses were complicated by bloody secretions present in the endotracheal tubes. Only one patient had lung isolation using dual-lumen endotracheal intubation and had an uneventful perioperative course. Postoperatively, the other two patients developed severe ARDS that required mechanical ventilation for several days, significantly complicating their recovery. Discussion: This case series highlights the relative risk of SSRF in patients with significant PC. Early SSRF in patients with PC ≥3 was associated with ARDS when patients did not undergo intraoperative lung isolation. In two patients with severe PC, the contusions themselves did not produce respiratory failure on admission; however, intraoperative positioning resulted in the aspiration of bloody secretions from the contused lung into the unaffected lung, causing severe postoperative ARDS. Suggested measures to prevent future events may include isolating the contused lung intraoperatively or delaying SSRF until contusion has resolved, if feasible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肋骨电镀后肺挫伤的并发症:一个病例系列和经验教训
背景:肋骨骨折手术稳定(SSRF)越来越受欢迎,报道的并发症发生率较低。肺挫伤(PC)被认为是胸壁损伤引起的呼吸衰竭患者使用SSRF的相对禁禁症。然而,报告的经验和临床数据有关PC在这个主题仍然有限。本研究的目的是描述使用SSRF治疗中重度pc患者的经验,并确定肺并发症术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的危险因素。方法:回顾某一级创伤中心2015 - 2019年创伤登记资料,对接受SSRF治疗的患者进行评估。研究人员检查了计算机断层扫描,计算了记录在案的PC患者的PC评分,并由委员会认证的放射科医生使用Chen等人描述的PC评分进行了验证。对人口学、临床和结局数据进行分析和报告。结果:92例患者在研究期间接受了SSRF治疗,被纳入初步分析。患者中男性占72.8%,从SSRF入组开始平均为5.5±4.4天。9例重度胸外伤合并pc患者行SSRF治疗。在这些患者中,4例有严重的双侧PC, 5例有严重的单侧PC,总计占总肺活量的20%。3例患者有同侧中至重度pc伴外伤性气肿。患者在入院后48小时内按标准做法接受SSRF治疗。患者均置于侧卧位,受累侧朝上。术中因气管内有血分泌物而变得复杂。只有1例患者采用双腔气管插管进行肺隔离,围手术期过程平稳。术后,另外两名患者出现严重的ARDS,需要机械通气数天,使其恢复明显复杂化。讨论:本病例系列强调了显著PC患者使用SSRF的相对风险。当PC≥3的患者未进行术中肺隔离时,早期SSRF与ARDS相关。2例严重PC患者入院时挫伤本身未发生呼吸衰竭;然而,术中定位导致血性分泌物从挫伤的肺吸入未受影响的肺,导致术后严重的ARDS。建议的预防未来事件的措施可能包括术中隔离挫伤肺或延迟SSRF直到挫伤消退,如果可行的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimal invasive approach for rib fractures: Feasibility and safety in a single-center experience Is flail chest correctly defined: A new definition is suggested Factors associated with early complications of surgical management due to penetrating laryngotracheal trauma in Colombia Posttraumatic pulmonary abscess Postoperative outcomes following surgical stabilization of rib fractures stratified by 5-factor modified frailty index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1