The comparison of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for adolescent depression

Oguz Guvenmez, Serkan Güneş
{"title":"The comparison of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for adolescent depression","authors":"Oguz Guvenmez, Serkan Güneş","doi":"10.5455/IM.24457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Major depression is a common psychiatric disorder among children, adolescents, and adults that affects the daily functioning. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and tolerability of three medications that frequently use in the treatment of adolescent depression. Methods: A total of 432 adolescents with documented DSM-5 major depression diagnosis was included to the study. Clinical characteristics of the sample were retrospectively obtained from the medical records and structured psychiatric interviews. Improvement was assessed with Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) and side effects were examined with the adverse effect scale developed by the authors. Results: Mean age of the patients was 14.11±1.75. 34.1% of adolescents were male and 65.9% were female. 38.0% of the patients were using fluoxetine, 43.3% were using sertraline, and 18.7% were using citalopram. The CGI-I and CDI scores were significantly different between the three groups. There was no significance in terms of treatment compliance. Stomach ache and aggressionirritability were meaningfully different between the groups. Conclusions: Citalopram appears to be less effective than fluoxetine and sertraline. Fluoxetine and sertraline seem to show similar effectiveness. Sertraline may be associated with less side effects and may be the most appropriate treatment for adolescent depression.","PeriodicalId":93574,"journal":{"name":"International medicine (Antioch, Turkey)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International medicine (Antioch, Turkey)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/IM.24457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major depression is a common psychiatric disorder among children, adolescents, and adults that affects the daily functioning. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and tolerability of three medications that frequently use in the treatment of adolescent depression. Methods: A total of 432 adolescents with documented DSM-5 major depression diagnosis was included to the study. Clinical characteristics of the sample were retrospectively obtained from the medical records and structured psychiatric interviews. Improvement was assessed with Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) and side effects were examined with the adverse effect scale developed by the authors. Results: Mean age of the patients was 14.11±1.75. 34.1% of adolescents were male and 65.9% were female. 38.0% of the patients were using fluoxetine, 43.3% were using sertraline, and 18.7% were using citalopram. The CGI-I and CDI scores were significantly different between the three groups. There was no significance in terms of treatment compliance. Stomach ache and aggressionirritability were meaningfully different between the groups. Conclusions: Citalopram appears to be less effective than fluoxetine and sertraline. Fluoxetine and sertraline seem to show similar effectiveness. Sertraline may be associated with less side effects and may be the most appropriate treatment for adolescent depression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂治疗青少年抑郁症的比较
背景:重度抑郁症是儿童、青少年和成人中常见的影响日常功能的精神疾病。在这项研究中,我们的目的是确定在青少年抑郁症的治疗中经常使用的三种药物的疗效和耐受性。方法:共纳入432名确诊为DSM-5重度抑郁症的青少年。样本的临床特征回顾性地从医疗记录和结构化的精神病学访谈中获得。采用儿童抑郁量表(CDI)和临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)评估改善情况,采用作者自行编制的不良反应量表检查副作用。结果:患者平均年龄14.11±1.75岁。青少年中男性占34.1%,女性占65.9%。氟西汀占38.0%,舍曲林占43.3%,西酞普兰占18.7%。CGI-I和CDI评分在三组间差异有统计学意义。治疗依从性方面无显著性差异。胃痛和攻击性易怒在两组之间有显著差异。结论:西酞普兰似乎不如氟西汀和舍曲林有效。氟西汀和舍曲林似乎表现出类似的效果。舍曲林的副作用较小,可能是治疗青少年抑郁症最合适的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
5q-Syndrome: A review of a rare myelodysplastic syndrome Needs for remote cardiac rehabilitation and remote music therapy in recent circumstances The effect on screening behaviors of health beliefs related to prostate cancer screening of seasonal agricultural workers individuals Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine ratio is an independent predictor for upper gastro-intestinal bleeding even in high prevalence chronic kidney disease population The morphology and neuronal-glial correlations of the spinal cord posterior horns of human embryos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1