Civil prospectus liability under the laws of Germany and South Africa

Q3 Social Sciences South African law journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.47348/salj/v139/i2a7
Damian Schmidt
{"title":"Civil prospectus liability under the laws of Germany and South Africa","authors":"Damian Schmidt","doi":"10.47348/salj/v139/i2a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civil prospectus liability is the liability for a prospectus which is published in the context of issued securities on the primary market. Both the German and South African legal systems protect investors who are induced into investing by incorrect prospectuses. Chapter 4 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 contains rules, in s 104 and s 105, which set out the prospectus liability of directors, experts, and others. German law provides comparable provisions. The differences between the two systems become apparent in the detail. South Africa’s statutory prospectus liability clearly sets out the liability of experts and focuses mainly on the personal liability of directors. The German law has traditionally referred to unwritten legal principles in respect of experts. What both legal systems have in common is that the mutual interests of potential plaintiffs and defendants are not exclusively regulated by statute law, and that both pursue a balanced form of investor protection. This article aims to contribute to the future harmonisation of both legal systems in order to facilitate cross-border investments.","PeriodicalId":39313,"journal":{"name":"South African law journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/salj/v139/i2a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Civil prospectus liability is the liability for a prospectus which is published in the context of issued securities on the primary market. Both the German and South African legal systems protect investors who are induced into investing by incorrect prospectuses. Chapter 4 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 contains rules, in s 104 and s 105, which set out the prospectus liability of directors, experts, and others. German law provides comparable provisions. The differences between the two systems become apparent in the detail. South Africa’s statutory prospectus liability clearly sets out the liability of experts and focuses mainly on the personal liability of directors. The German law has traditionally referred to unwritten legal principles in respect of experts. What both legal systems have in common is that the mutual interests of potential plaintiffs and defendants are not exclusively regulated by statute law, and that both pursue a balanced form of investor protection. This article aims to contribute to the future harmonisation of both legal systems in order to facilitate cross-border investments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国和南非法律下的民事招股责任
民事招股说明书责任是指在一级市场上发行的证券中公布的招股说明书的责任。德国和南非的法律体系都保护那些被不正确的招股说明书引诱投资的投资者。2008年颁布的《公司法》第4章第104条和第105条规定了招股说明书中董事、专家和其他人的责任。德国法律也有类似的规定。这两种体系之间的差异在细节上变得明显起来。南非的法定招股说明书责任明确规定了专家的责任,主要侧重于董事的个人责任。德国法律传统上提到了关于专家的不成文法律原则。这两种法律体系的共同之处在于,潜在原告和被告的共同利益并不完全受成文法的制约,而且两者都追求一种平衡的投资者保护形式。本文旨在促进未来两国法律制度的协调,以促进跨境投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African law journal
South African law journal Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A legislative framework for shareholder approval of political donations and expenditure by companies in South Africa Reflecting on the tension between the development of the common law and the doctrine of separation of powers in Paulsen v Slip Knot Investments 777 (Pty) Ltd Notes: The Krugersdorp gang rapes — Another Tshabalala v S; Ntuli v S? Book Review: Tjakie Naudé & Daniel Visser (eds) The Future of the Law of Contract: Essays in Honour of Dale Hutchison (2021) The classification of a ‘maritime claim’ in South Africa under the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1