A comparative account using student feedback on diverse modules of e-learning used during COVID-19 lockdown for undergraduate medical teaching

F. Shaikh, K. Naseeruddin, M. Ahmed, Nabila Afsar, Naseem Begum, Madhipati Krishna, A. Chandrasekhar
{"title":"A comparative account using student feedback on diverse modules of e-learning used during COVID-19 lockdown for undergraduate medical teaching","authors":"F. Shaikh, K. Naseeruddin, M. Ahmed, Nabila Afsar, Naseem Begum, Madhipati Krishna, A. Chandrasekhar","doi":"10.5455/jmas.54405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Need has been the mother of innovation and with the global pandemic of the highly infectious disease COVID 19, there has been a paradigm shift from conventional teaching to digital mode of virtual teaching methods. This task has been achieved by using various platforms available on the digital network, the internet. This work describes the change in medical education, using student feed-back on various modules used in teaching during that period. The feedback survey was conducted online by using the available platforms. The Google forms were used as a survey tool for conducting this survey. The responses were collected from all implied consenting students attending the various teaching sessions across different years of training, belonging to our medical institution. All the participants were adult students attending a medical college. The response rate among the participants was 54%. The respondents were majority 184 (76%) female gender. Nearly 90% opted for Google Meet/classroom as a preferred online module. The choice of selecting this module among the students was found to be statistically significant as compared to other options. The selection was based on the virtue of attributes such as user-friendly application, user satisfaction, beneficial, appealing, less technically challenging, convenient and cost-effective nature. Hence to conclude we may imply to say that this study was unique in assessing the mind of the medical students against this novel e-learning based online mode of education which has taken them by surprise. Though the method is good, there is a lacking that it has; as compared to the conventional means of teaching. This may be used to revise and consolidate the teaching process but not as to replace the classical method rather it should complement it.","PeriodicalId":16176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jmas.54405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Need has been the mother of innovation and with the global pandemic of the highly infectious disease COVID 19, there has been a paradigm shift from conventional teaching to digital mode of virtual teaching methods. This task has been achieved by using various platforms available on the digital network, the internet. This work describes the change in medical education, using student feed-back on various modules used in teaching during that period. The feedback survey was conducted online by using the available platforms. The Google forms were used as a survey tool for conducting this survey. The responses were collected from all implied consenting students attending the various teaching sessions across different years of training, belonging to our medical institution. All the participants were adult students attending a medical college. The response rate among the participants was 54%. The respondents were majority 184 (76%) female gender. Nearly 90% opted for Google Meet/classroom as a preferred online module. The choice of selecting this module among the students was found to be statistically significant as compared to other options. The selection was based on the virtue of attributes such as user-friendly application, user satisfaction, beneficial, appealing, less technically challenging, convenient and cost-effective nature. Hence to conclude we may imply to say that this study was unique in assessing the mind of the medical students against this novel e-learning based online mode of education which has taken them by surprise. Though the method is good, there is a lacking that it has; as compared to the conventional means of teaching. This may be used to revise and consolidate the teaching process but not as to replace the classical method rather it should complement it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用学生对2019冠状病毒病封锁期间用于本科医学教学的各种电子学习模块的反馈进行比较
需求是创新之母,随着高度传染性疾病COVID - 19的全球大流行,从传统教学模式转向虚拟教学方法的数字模式。这项任务是通过使用数字网络,互联网上的各种平台来实现的。这项工作描述了医学教育的变化,利用学生对那段时期教学中使用的各种模块的反馈。反馈调查是利用现有平台在网上进行的。谷歌表格被用作进行这项调查的调查工具。这些回答是从我们医疗机构所属的所有参加不同年份培训的各种教学课程的隐含同意的学生中收集的。所有的参与者都是一所医学院的成年学生。参与者的回复率为54%。受访者中有184人(76%)为女性。近90%的人选择b谷歌Meet/classroom作为首选的在线模块。与其他选项相比,选择该模块的学生在统计上具有显著性。选择的依据是用户友好、用户满意、有益、吸引人、技术挑战小、方便和成本效益等属性。因此,总结起来,我们可能会暗示说,这项研究在评估医学生对这种新颖的基于电子学习的在线教育模式的看法方面是独一无二的,这种教育模式令他们感到惊讶。方法虽好,但也有不足之处;与传统的教学方式相比。这可以用来修改和巩固教学过程,但不应该取代经典方法,而应该补充它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nutrition practices in COVID-19 patients Prescription pattern of depressive and anxiety disorders in patients attending Psychiatry outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in Telangana Study of clinical presentation, laboratory profile, transfusion requirements and transfusion-related infectious complications in adult patients of congenital hemolytic anemia in a tertiary care center MRI evaluation of meniscal injuries of knee with arthroscopy correlation: A comparative study in a tertiary care hospital An outcome of acute kidney injury during pregnancy: An observation and prospective study from tertiary care hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1