A study to compare the performance of students following self-directed learning sessions conducted without online support and self-directed learning sessions conducted with the help of online support in the department of physiology

P. Sinha, Arun Chaudhuri, D. Adhya
{"title":"A study to compare the performance of students following self-directed learning sessions conducted without online support and self-directed learning sessions conducted with the help of online support in the department of physiology","authors":"P. Sinha, Arun Chaudhuri, D. Adhya","doi":"10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_27_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical students need to develop self-directed learning (SDL) skills to become life-long learners. Aims: To compare the performance of students following SDL sessions conducted in the offline mode and SDL sessions conducted with the help of online support in the department of physiology. Methodology and Participants: This study was conducted on 200 first-phase MBBS students (Batch 21–22) after taking Institutional Ethical Clearance and informed consent of the participants. Nerve muscle physiology was taught using the two methods of SDL. The assessment was done using multiple choice questions. Pre-test and post-test were conducted for all sessions and ten such sessions were assessed in the present study. Feedback was taken from students and facilitators. Program evaluation was done using Kirkpatrick level 1 evaluation. Pre-test and post-test scores of the same group were compared using the paired t-test and among two groups were compared using an unpaired t-test. Results: Students performed significantly better in SDL sessions where online support was better and the performance of female students was significantly better as compared to male counterparts (87.27 ± 7.09 vs. 84.79 ± 8.49; P<0.001**). Students were satisfied with the SDL sessions and more so with online support. Faculty members and students emphasized that online support increased bonding among students as well as bonding with the facilitators. Conclusions: Providing online support to medical students was found to have positive effects on learning in the present study. Female students developed better problem-solving attitudes and critical thinking abilities as compared to males and were more motivated in learning.","PeriodicalId":19108,"journal":{"name":"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_27_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical students need to develop self-directed learning (SDL) skills to become life-long learners. Aims: To compare the performance of students following SDL sessions conducted in the offline mode and SDL sessions conducted with the help of online support in the department of physiology. Methodology and Participants: This study was conducted on 200 first-phase MBBS students (Batch 21–22) after taking Institutional Ethical Clearance and informed consent of the participants. Nerve muscle physiology was taught using the two methods of SDL. The assessment was done using multiple choice questions. Pre-test and post-test were conducted for all sessions and ten such sessions were assessed in the present study. Feedback was taken from students and facilitators. Program evaluation was done using Kirkpatrick level 1 evaluation. Pre-test and post-test scores of the same group were compared using the paired t-test and among two groups were compared using an unpaired t-test. Results: Students performed significantly better in SDL sessions where online support was better and the performance of female students was significantly better as compared to male counterparts (87.27 ± 7.09 vs. 84.79 ± 8.49; P<0.001**). Students were satisfied with the SDL sessions and more so with online support. Faculty members and students emphasized that online support increased bonding among students as well as bonding with the facilitators. Conclusions: Providing online support to medical students was found to have positive effects on learning in the present study. Female students developed better problem-solving attitudes and critical thinking abilities as compared to males and were more motivated in learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项比较生理学系学生在没有网络支持的情况下自主学习和有网络支持的情况下自主学习的表现的研究
背景:医学生需要培养自主学习(SDL)技能,成为终身学习者。目的:比较生理学系线下模式和在线支持模式下SDL学生的表现。方法和参与者:本研究在获得机构伦理许可和参与者知情同意后,对200名第一阶段MBBS学生(第21-22批)进行了研究。采用两种方法进行神经肌肉生理学教学。评估采用多项选择题。本研究对所有阶段进行了前测和后测,并对10个阶段进行了评估。反馈来自学生和辅导员。项目评估采用Kirkpatrick 1级评估。同一组的前测和后测成绩采用配对t检验比较,两组间采用非配对t检验比较。结果:在线支持较好的学生在SDL课程中表现较好,女学生的表现显著优于男学生(87.27±7.09 vs. 84.79±8.49;P < 0.001 * *)。学生们对SDL课程感到满意,对在线支持更是如此。教师和学生都强调,在线支持增加了学生之间以及与辅导员之间的联系。结论:本研究发现医学生在线学习支持对学习有积极影响。与男生相比,女生表现出了更好的解决问题的态度和批判性思维能力,在学习上也更有动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical profile of term neonates requiring intervention for hyperbilirubinemia Evaluation of serum magnesium levels among type 2 diabetes individuals of a South Indian town Knowledge of E-Shram card among the rural population of Kurnool district in Andhra Pradesh: A cross-sectional study Human papilloma virus-related oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: An assessment of histomorphological features Influence of dengue endemicity on malaria identification by automated hematology analyzer – Beckman Coulter LH750: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1