Single-step versus stepwise dilatation technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Rawal Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5455/rmj.20230311075832
Batool Attallah, Majed Mohammad
{"title":"Single-step versus stepwise dilatation technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy","authors":"Batool Attallah, Majed Mohammad","doi":"10.5455/rmj.20230311075832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare single-step dilatation technique with the stepwise (serial) dilatation technique in order to create a nephrostomy tract during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methodology: This comparative interventional single-center study was conducted from May 2020 to November 2021 at Basra Teaching Hospital, Iraq. Fifty patients in group A underwent the single-step dilatation and 70 patients in group B were subjected to the stepwise dilatation technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. We recorded number of punctures, operation time, complications and success. Results: There were no significant statistical differences in both groups regarding success rate, hospital stay, intra and postoperative complications, and bleeding that required blood transfusion. The stepwise dilatation technique had a considerably longer mean dilatation time than the single-step method did. The single-step dilatation technique had a much shorter mean radiation exposure a shorter mean total operating time than the stepwise strategy. Conclusion: The construction and dilatation of a percutaneous nephrolithotomy nephrostomy tract can be successfully carried out using a single-step dilatation procedure, which requires less radiation exposure, less time during surgery, and shorter dilatation time.","PeriodicalId":20844,"journal":{"name":"Rawal Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rawal Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/rmj.20230311075832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare single-step dilatation technique with the stepwise (serial) dilatation technique in order to create a nephrostomy tract during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methodology: This comparative interventional single-center study was conducted from May 2020 to November 2021 at Basra Teaching Hospital, Iraq. Fifty patients in group A underwent the single-step dilatation and 70 patients in group B were subjected to the stepwise dilatation technique in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. We recorded number of punctures, operation time, complications and success. Results: There were no significant statistical differences in both groups regarding success rate, hospital stay, intra and postoperative complications, and bleeding that required blood transfusion. The stepwise dilatation technique had a considerably longer mean dilatation time than the single-step method did. The single-step dilatation technique had a much shorter mean radiation exposure a shorter mean total operating time than the stepwise strategy. Conclusion: The construction and dilatation of a percutaneous nephrolithotomy nephrostomy tract can be successfully carried out using a single-step dilatation procedure, which requires less radiation exposure, less time during surgery, and shorter dilatation time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单步与逐步扩张技术在经皮肾镜取石术中的应用
目的:比较单步扩张技术与逐级扩张技术在经皮肾镜取石术中形成肾造瘘道的效果。方法:这项比较介入单中心研究于2020年5月至2021年11月在伊拉克巴士拉教学医院进行。A组50例采用单步扩张术,B组70例采用逐级扩张术。记录穿刺次数、手术时间、并发症及成功情况。结果:两组患者在成功率、住院时间、术中及术后并发症、需要输血的出血量等方面均无统计学差异。分步扩张法的平均扩张时间明显长于单步扩张法。与分步扩张法相比,单步扩张法的平均辐照量和平均总手术时间短得多。结论:经皮肾镜取石肾造瘘道的构筑和扩张采用单步扩张术,其辐射暴露少,术中时间短,扩张时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rawal Medical Journal
Rawal Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: RMJ is a general Medicine publication and accepts oorigial articles, editorials, case reports and commentaries. It aims to dessiminate medical knowldge to professional community.
期刊最新文献
Case of nasolabial cyst excised by transnasal endoscopic approach: A rare case report Patients unfit for Lasik can benefit from implanted phakic copolymer lens Burnout among academic clinicians: A sample from medical colleges in Baghdad, Iraq Knowledge, attitude and practices of medical students regarding COVID-19 pandemic, Baghdad, Iraq 2022 AUMED (Automatic Media Dispenser): Inovation in automatic liquid media dispenser as a support for microbiology laboratory diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1