Evaluation of tubal patency and its impact on ovarian blood flow and function: a comparison of hysterosalpingography and HyCoSy

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Rawal Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5455/rmj.20230209064737
Wasanadnan abduhameed
{"title":"Evaluation of tubal patency and its impact on ovarian blood flow and function: a comparison of hysterosalpingography and HyCoSy","authors":"Wasanadnan abduhameed","doi":"10.5455/rmj.20230209064737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography (HyCoSy) as a safe, effective, easy, and cheaper approach to measure tubal patency than hysterosalpingography (HSG) and to correlate better ovarian function, endometrial and ovarian blood flow, and conception rates in infertile women. Methodology: This cross-sectional study included 40 infertile women between 22 and 42 years age; 20 of them had HSG on day 6 or 7 of cycle and 20 HyCoSy with normal saline and 100 mg hydrocortisone. All underwent the protocol of 75 iu gonal F sc on days 2 and 3, with clomiphene 50 mg twice daily from days 2 to 7 or letrizole 2.5 twice daily from days 3 to 8 (around day 14). Evaluated criteria: resistance index (RI) and perfusion index (PI) of ovarian vessels by Doppler ultrasound, number and size of follicles for both groups, endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, zones of blood flow to endometrium. Then HCG to promote ovulation and progesterone to support luteal phase. Results: HSG group mean age was 29.7 6 HYCOSY group age was 29 6 years. 82.1% of HSG females and 90.1% of HyCoSy females had 2nd infertility. Females undergoing HSG had 42.9% I zone and 65.6% IV zone. Females undergoing HSG and HyCoSy had 1 follicle, respectively. 68.8% of HyCoSy females were pregnant. HSG and HyCoSy had different RI, thickness. HyCoSy was thicker and had less RI than HSG. HSG and HyCoSy had similar numbers and sizes of follicles. Conclusion: HyCoSy was a safe, effective, easy, and cheaper way to evaluate tubal patency than HSG, less RI and increase endometrium thickness.","PeriodicalId":20844,"journal":{"name":"Rawal Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rawal Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/rmj.20230209064737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography (HyCoSy) as a safe, effective, easy, and cheaper approach to measure tubal patency than hysterosalpingography (HSG) and to correlate better ovarian function, endometrial and ovarian blood flow, and conception rates in infertile women. Methodology: This cross-sectional study included 40 infertile women between 22 and 42 years age; 20 of them had HSG on day 6 or 7 of cycle and 20 HyCoSy with normal saline and 100 mg hydrocortisone. All underwent the protocol of 75 iu gonal F sc on days 2 and 3, with clomiphene 50 mg twice daily from days 2 to 7 or letrizole 2.5 twice daily from days 3 to 8 (around day 14). Evaluated criteria: resistance index (RI) and perfusion index (PI) of ovarian vessels by Doppler ultrasound, number and size of follicles for both groups, endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, zones of blood flow to endometrium. Then HCG to promote ovulation and progesterone to support luteal phase. Results: HSG group mean age was 29.7 6 HYCOSY group age was 29 6 years. 82.1% of HSG females and 90.1% of HyCoSy females had 2nd infertility. Females undergoing HSG had 42.9% I zone and 65.6% IV zone. Females undergoing HSG and HyCoSy had 1 follicle, respectively. 68.8% of HyCoSy females were pregnant. HSG and HyCoSy had different RI, thickness. HyCoSy was thicker and had less RI than HSG. HSG and HyCoSy had similar numbers and sizes of follicles. Conclusion: HyCoSy was a safe, effective, easy, and cheaper way to evaluate tubal patency than HSG, less RI and increase endometrium thickness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估输卵管通畅及其对卵巢血流和功能的影响:子宫输卵管造影与HyCoSy的比较
目的:探讨子宫输卵管造影(HyCoSy)作为一种比子宫输卵管造影(HSG)更安全、有效、简便、廉价的测量输卵管通畅的方法,并与不孕妇女更好的卵巢功能、子宫内膜和卵巢血流量以及受孕率之间的关系。方法:这项横断面研究包括40名22至42岁的不孕妇女;20例于月经周期第6、7天行输卵管造影,20例用生理盐水加100 mg氢化可的松治疗。所有患者均在第2天和第3天接受75 iu的fsc治疗,第2天至第7天使用克罗米芬50 mg每日2次,第3天至第8天(约第14天)使用来曲唑2.5每日2次。评价标准:多普勒超声卵巢血管阻力指数(RI)和灌注指数(PI),两组卵泡数量和大小,子宫内膜厚度,子宫内膜形态,子宫内膜血流量区域。然后HCG促进排卵,黄体酮支持黄体期。结果:HSG组平均年龄29.7 6岁,HYCOSY组平均年龄29.6岁。82.1%的HSG女性和90.1%的HyCoSy女性发生二次不孕。接受输卵管造影的女性有42.9%为I区,65.6%为IV区。接受HSG和HyCoSy的雌性分别有1个卵泡。68.8%的HyCoSy女性怀孕。HSG和HyCoSy具有不同的RI、厚度。HyCoSy比HSG更厚,RI更少。HSG和HyCoSy的卵泡数量和大小相似。结论:与HSG相比,HyCoSy是一种安全、有效、简便、经济的评估输卵管通畅的方法,可减少RI,增加子宫内膜厚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rawal Medical Journal
Rawal Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: RMJ is a general Medicine publication and accepts oorigial articles, editorials, case reports and commentaries. It aims to dessiminate medical knowldge to professional community.
期刊最新文献
Case of nasolabial cyst excised by transnasal endoscopic approach: A rare case report Patients unfit for Lasik can benefit from implanted phakic copolymer lens Burnout among academic clinicians: A sample from medical colleges in Baghdad, Iraq Knowledge, attitude and practices of medical students regarding COVID-19 pandemic, Baghdad, Iraq 2022 AUMED (Automatic Media Dispenser): Inovation in automatic liquid media dispenser as a support for microbiology laboratory diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1