Developing Evaluable Principles for Community-University Partnerships

Rachel E. Nelson
{"title":"Developing Evaluable Principles for Community-University Partnerships","authors":"Rachel E. Nelson","doi":"10.54656/jdgk9182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As post-secondary institutions across the globe have identified community engagement as a central component of their visions and missions, the interest in measurement and evaluation at the institutional level has increased over the past few decades. Yet the complex, distributed, dynamic and ever-changing nature of community-university engagement poses a number of evaluation challenges. The purpose of this paper is to explore a possible evaluation match called Principles-Focused Evaluation (Patton, 2018) that uses principles as the core evaluand as opposed to specific projects, programs, or initiatives as the focus of evaluation. Principles, when clearly and meaningfully articulated, welcome complexity and provide direction to guide action and behaviour towards desired results within a variety of contexts, without prescribing specific activities or models for what should be done and how. The focus of the article is to articulate a set of effectiveness principles for community-university partnerships that reflect both university and community interests, which is the first step in a principles-focused formative evaluation process. Next steps for a principles-focused evaluation are outlined in order to determine to what extent the process of engaging in community-university partnerships in a principled way is contributing towards the desired results of community-university engagement at the institutional level.","PeriodicalId":73680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54656/jdgk9182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

As post-secondary institutions across the globe have identified community engagement as a central component of their visions and missions, the interest in measurement and evaluation at the institutional level has increased over the past few decades. Yet the complex, distributed, dynamic and ever-changing nature of community-university engagement poses a number of evaluation challenges. The purpose of this paper is to explore a possible evaluation match called Principles-Focused Evaluation (Patton, 2018) that uses principles as the core evaluand as opposed to specific projects, programs, or initiatives as the focus of evaluation. Principles, when clearly and meaningfully articulated, welcome complexity and provide direction to guide action and behaviour towards desired results within a variety of contexts, without prescribing specific activities or models for what should be done and how. The focus of the article is to articulate a set of effectiveness principles for community-university partnerships that reflect both university and community interests, which is the first step in a principles-focused formative evaluation process. Next steps for a principles-focused evaluation are outlined in order to determine to what extent the process of engaging in community-university partnerships in a principled way is contributing towards the desired results of community-university engagement at the institutional level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展社区-大学伙伴关系的可评估原则
随着全球高等教育机构将社区参与确定为其愿景和使命的核心组成部分,在过去几十年里,对机构层面的测量和评估的兴趣有所增加。然而,社区大学参与的复杂性、分散性、动态性和不断变化的性质给评估带来了许多挑战。本文的目的是探索一种可能的评估匹配,称为以原则为中心的评估(Patton, 2018),它将原则作为核心评估,而不是将特定的项目、计划或举措作为评估的重点。原则在明确和有意义地阐述时,欢迎复杂性,并提供指导行动和行为的方向,以在各种情况下实现期望的结果,而不是规定应该做什么和如何做的具体活动或模式。本文的重点是阐明一套反映大学和社区利益的社区大学合作伙伴关系的有效性原则,这是以原则为中心的形成性评估过程的第一步。概述了以原则为重点的评估的下一步步骤,以便确定以原则方式参与社区大学伙伴关系的过程在多大程度上有助于在机构一级实现社区大学参与的预期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Honoring Culture and Voice By Empowering the Community: How a Grassroots Community Center Became the Waipahu Safe Haven Life on the Island: Collage Portraiture and Storytelling as Community Building Embracing Community-Centric Careers in a Post-Barbie World: Navigating Identity, Expectations, and Impact in Medicine and Veterinary Medicine Community Perspectives on Readiness and Social Drivers of Crime Toward a Beloved Community: Facilitated Group Listening as a Tool for Community Development and Civic Engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1