Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: Experience from the pediatric ophthalmology referral center in Malaysia with literature review.

IF 1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-04-28 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00162
Yong Zheng Wai, Dhanya Menon Radhakrishnan, Ganeshwara Lingam, Norhafizah Hamzah, Jamalia Rahmat
{"title":"Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: Experience from the pediatric ophthalmology referral center in Malaysia with literature review.","authors":"Yong Zheng Wai, Dhanya Menon Radhakrishnan, Ganeshwara Lingam, Norhafizah Hamzah, Jamalia Rahmat","doi":"10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to analyze our 4-year experience of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma (RB) and to examine the tumor response, globe salvage, mortality, and safety profile of IAC in the Malaysian profile.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, interventional case series. A total of 22 eyes of 20 patients with RB who underwent IAC using melphalan and topotecan from January 2018 to December 2021 in Hospital Kuala Lumpur were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor response, globe salvage, mortality, and safety profile of IAC were compared based on the International Classification of Retinoblastoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age at IAC was 21.3 months. An overall globe salvage rate of 63.6% was observed: more specifically, 100% for Group A, 75% for Groups B and C, 66.7% for Group D, and 42.9% for Group E. Poor tumor response after IAC was significantly associated with a lesser chance of globe salvage (<i>P</i> = 0.045). The overall rate of good tumor response following IAC was 77.3%. Specifically, rates of good tumor response in each group were 100%, 75%, 75%, 83.3% and 71.4% in group A, B, C, D and E, respectively. The mortality rate was 5%. Complications (per-catheterization) included cerebral infarct (2.2%), oxygen desaturation (2.2%), vomiting (26.1%), periorbital edema (8.8%), ptosis (6.5%), fever, femoral hematoma, and hyperpigmentation over lid (4.4% each).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Four-year experience showed that IAC is a safe and effective method for RB management. Patients with a poor response after IAC may have a lower chance of globe salvage. Careful patient selection is of utmost importance to achieve the best outcome in a setting of limited health-care resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":44978,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10798403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to analyze our 4-year experience of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma (RB) and to examine the tumor response, globe salvage, mortality, and safety profile of IAC in the Malaysian profile.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, interventional case series. A total of 22 eyes of 20 patients with RB who underwent IAC using melphalan and topotecan from January 2018 to December 2021 in Hospital Kuala Lumpur were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor response, globe salvage, mortality, and safety profile of IAC were compared based on the International Classification of Retinoblastoma.

Results: The mean patient age at IAC was 21.3 months. An overall globe salvage rate of 63.6% was observed: more specifically, 100% for Group A, 75% for Groups B and C, 66.7% for Group D, and 42.9% for Group E. Poor tumor response after IAC was significantly associated with a lesser chance of globe salvage (P = 0.045). The overall rate of good tumor response following IAC was 77.3%. Specifically, rates of good tumor response in each group were 100%, 75%, 75%, 83.3% and 71.4% in group A, B, C, D and E, respectively. The mortality rate was 5%. Complications (per-catheterization) included cerebral infarct (2.2%), oxygen desaturation (2.2%), vomiting (26.1%), periorbital edema (8.8%), ptosis (6.5%), fever, femoral hematoma, and hyperpigmentation over lid (4.4% each).

Conclusion: Four-year experience showed that IAC is a safe and effective method for RB management. Patients with a poor response after IAC may have a lower chance of globe salvage. Careful patient selection is of utmost importance to achieve the best outcome in a setting of limited health-care resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜母细胞瘤的动脉内化疗:马来西亚儿童眼科转诊中心的经验及文献综述。
目的:我们旨在分析我们对视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)进行动脉内化疗(IAC)的4年经验,并研究马来西亚IAC的肿瘤反应、全球挽救率、死亡率和安全性概况:这是一项回顾性介入病例系列研究。回顾性分析了2018年1月至2021年12月在吉隆坡医院使用美法仑和托泊替康接受IAC治疗的20名RB患者的22只眼睛。根据视网膜母细胞瘤国际分类比较了IAC的肿瘤反应、球部挽救、死亡率和安全性:结果:接受IAC治疗的患者平均年龄为21.3个月。IAC术后肿瘤反应差与眼球挽救率低显著相关(P = 0.045)。IAC 术后肿瘤反应良好的总比率为 77.3%。具体来说,A、B、C、D 和 E 组的肿瘤良好反应率分别为 100%、75%、75%、83.3% 和 71.4%。死亡率为 5%。并发症(导管插入后)包括脑梗塞(2.2%)、氧饱和度下降(2.2%)、呕吐(26.1%)、眶周水肿(8.8%)、眼睑下垂(6.5%)、发热、股骨头血肿和睑部色素沉着(各占 4.4%):四年的经验表明,IAC是一种安全有效的RB治疗方法。结论:四年的经验表明,IAC是治疗RB的一种安全有效的方法。在医疗资源有限的情况下,谨慎选择患者以获得最佳疗效至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advancing glaucoma care with big data and artificial intelligence innovations. Application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma care: An updated review. Artificial intelligence and big data integration in anterior segment imaging for glaucoma. Big data and electronic health records for glaucoma research. Big data for imaging assessment in glaucoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1