Pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in mild traumatic brain injury.

IF 1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-05-23 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00169
Pritam Dutta, Ayisha Atiya, Smita Vittal, S Ambika, Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen
{"title":"Pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Pritam Dutta, Ayisha Atiya, Smita Vittal, S Ambika, Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen","doi":"10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To measure the pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) as compared to age-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective comparative study was carried out at the neuro-optometry clinic of a tertiary eye care hospital. Sixty-three subjects with a history of mTBI and ninety age-matched controls were enrolled in this study. Subjects in the age range of 18-35 years were included in the study. A comprehensive neuro-optometric assessment was performed followed by pupillary dynamics and accommodation response measurements using NeurOptics® pupillary light reflex™-3000 and Grand-Seiko WAM-5500 binocular accommodation auto ref/keratometer | shigiya machinery works LTD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was noticed for constriction percentage (%): 32.73 ± 9.20 versus 39.93 ± 7.36 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), average constriction velocity (mm/s): 2.24 ± 0.85 versus 2.62 ± 0.68 (<i>P</i> = 0.002), maximum constriction velocity (mm/s): 3.82 ± 1.33 versus 4.42 ± 0.93 (<i>P</i> = 0.004) and T75 (recovery period to 75% of the baseline pupillary diameter in sec): 1.38 ± 0.36 versus 2.0 ± 0.82 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) in mTBI compared to age-matched controls. A statistically significant difference was noted for accommodative response (in D) as well as in the sample as compared to age-matched controls: -1.12 ± 0.64 versus - 1.39 ± 0.47 (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pupillary constriction velocities and accommodative response are significantly affected in mTBI. These findings have important clinical implications in being able to understand the visual symptoms following an mTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":44978,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the pupillary dynamics and accommodative response in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) as compared to age-matched controls.

Materials and methods: This prospective comparative study was carried out at the neuro-optometry clinic of a tertiary eye care hospital. Sixty-three subjects with a history of mTBI and ninety age-matched controls were enrolled in this study. Subjects in the age range of 18-35 years were included in the study. A comprehensive neuro-optometric assessment was performed followed by pupillary dynamics and accommodation response measurements using NeurOptics® pupillary light reflex™-3000 and Grand-Seiko WAM-5500 binocular accommodation auto ref/keratometer | shigiya machinery works LTD.

Results: A statistically significant difference was noticed for constriction percentage (%): 32.73 ± 9.20 versus 39.93 ± 7.36 (P < 0.001), average constriction velocity (mm/s): 2.24 ± 0.85 versus 2.62 ± 0.68 (P = 0.002), maximum constriction velocity (mm/s): 3.82 ± 1.33 versus 4.42 ± 0.93 (P = 0.004) and T75 (recovery period to 75% of the baseline pupillary diameter in sec): 1.38 ± 0.36 versus 2.0 ± 0.82 (P < 0.001) in mTBI compared to age-matched controls. A statistically significant difference was noted for accommodative response (in D) as well as in the sample as compared to age-matched controls: -1.12 ± 0.64 versus - 1.39 ± 0.47 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Pupillary constriction velocities and accommodative response are significantly affected in mTBI. These findings have important clinical implications in being able to understand the visual symptoms following an mTBI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度脑外伤的瞳孔动态和适应反应。
目的:与年龄匹配的对照组相比,测量轻度脑外伤(mTBI)患者的瞳孔动态和适应反应:这项前瞻性比较研究在一家三级眼科医院的神经视光诊所进行。研究共招募了 63 名有 mTBI 病史的受试者和 90 名年龄匹配的对照组受试者。研究对象的年龄在 18-35 岁之间。研究人员使用 NeurOptics® pupillary light reflex™-3000 和 Grand-Seiko WAM-5500 双目调节自动反射/角膜计进行了全面的神经视力评估,随后使用 NeurOptics® pupillary light reflex™-3000 和 Grand-Seiko WAM-5500 双目调节自动反射/角膜计测量了瞳孔动态和调节反应:收缩百分比(%)的差异具有统计学意义:3.82 ± 1.33 对 4.42 ± 0.93(P = 0.004),T75(恢复到基线瞳孔直径 75% 的时间,秒):与年龄匹配的对照组相比,mTBI患者的T75(恢复到基线瞳孔直径75%的时间,以秒为单位):1.38 ± 0.36对2.0 ± 0.82(P < 0.001)。与年龄匹配的对照组相比,适应反应(以 D 为单位)以及样本中的适应反应均存在明显的统计学差异:-1.12 ± 0.64 对 - 1.39 ± 0.47(P < 0.001):结论:瞳孔收缩速度和适应反应在 mTBI 中受到显著影响。这些发现对理解 mTBI 后的视觉症状具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advancing glaucoma care with big data and artificial intelligence innovations. Application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma care: An updated review. Artificial intelligence and big data integration in anterior segment imaging for glaucoma. Big data and electronic health records for glaucoma research. Big data for imaging assessment in glaucoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1