Analysis of Strength Hydraulic Concrete Produced with a Mixture ofCrushed Gneiss and Alluvial Sand

Mambou Ngueyep Luc Leroy, Tchapga Gniamsi Guy Molay, Ndop Joseph, Ndjaka Jean Marie bienvenu
{"title":"Analysis of Strength Hydraulic Concrete Produced with a Mixture ofCrushed Gneiss and Alluvial Sand","authors":"Mambou Ngueyep Luc Leroy, Tchapga Gniamsi Guy Molay, Ndop Joseph, Ndjaka Jean Marie bienvenu","doi":"10.4172/2168-9873.1000289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the construction industry has been faced with a decline in the availability of natural sand due to the growth of the industry. In the present study, effect of gneiss powder as fine aggregate replacement on the compressive strength of concrete was investigated. The percentage of gniess powder added by weight was 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% as a replacement of river sand used in normal concrete. Tests were performed for compressive strength tests for all replacement levels of gneiss sand at different curing period (7 days, 28 days and 90 days). The results revealed that all the concrete made with different replacement present the good mechanical performance. At 90 days, the maximal values of compressive strength are obtained for conventional concrete CN (37.07 MPa), followed by CG75 concrete made with 25% of river sand and 75% of crushed gneiss (35.09 MPa). Then it is suggested that sand with a partial substitution of 75% can be effectively used in concrete production without affecting the strength and durability properties of the concrete.","PeriodicalId":90573,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied mechanical engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied mechanical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9873.1000289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In recent years, the construction industry has been faced with a decline in the availability of natural sand due to the growth of the industry. In the present study, effect of gneiss powder as fine aggregate replacement on the compressive strength of concrete was investigated. The percentage of gniess powder added by weight was 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% as a replacement of river sand used in normal concrete. Tests were performed for compressive strength tests for all replacement levels of gneiss sand at different curing period (7 days, 28 days and 90 days). The results revealed that all the concrete made with different replacement present the good mechanical performance. At 90 days, the maximal values of compressive strength are obtained for conventional concrete CN (37.07 MPa), followed by CG75 concrete made with 25% of river sand and 75% of crushed gneiss (35.09 MPa). Then it is suggested that sand with a partial substitution of 75% can be effectively used in concrete production without affecting the strength and durability properties of the concrete.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
片麻岩碎石与冲积砂混合配制水工混凝土强度分析
近年来,由于行业的增长,建筑行业面临着天然砂可用性下降的问题。本文研究了片麻岩粉替代细骨料对混凝土抗压强度的影响。麻质粉的重量添加比例分别为0%、25%、50%、75%和100%,替代普通混凝土中使用的河砂。在不同养护周期(7天、28天、90天)下,对不同置换级别片麻岩砂进行抗压强度试验。结果表明,采用不同置换方式配制的混凝土均表现出良好的力学性能。在90 d时,常规混凝土CN的抗压强度最大值为37.07 MPa,其次是25%河砂和75%片麻岩碎石的CG75混凝土(35.09 MPa)。在不影响混凝土强度和耐久性的前提下,部分替代量为75%的砂可以有效地用于混凝土生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Overview Theoretical Demonstration of a Capacitive Rotor. Holography: An Overview Determination of Acoustic Characteristics of Melamine foam withExperimental Validation Fluidics: An Overview An Overview Non Reciprocity and Reversibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1