Physical Activity Behavior Comparisons Between Adults With and Without Type 1 Diabetes

C. Beattie, J. Stein, K. Heinrich
{"title":"Physical Activity Behavior Comparisons Between Adults With and Without Type 1 Diabetes","authors":"C. Beattie, J. Stein, K. Heinrich","doi":"10.4148/2572-1836.1087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical activity (PA) is a widely accepted strategy to manage chronic diseases like type 1 diabetes; however, unique PA barriers likely result in lower PA levels among person(s) with type 1 diabetes (PWT1D), compared to person(s) without type 1 diabetes (PWOT1D). The integrated theory of health behavior change (ITHBC) (i.e., knowledge/beliefs, self-regulation, and self-management) provides a helpful framework for understanding PA and other health behaviors. This research aimed to determine differences in PA between adult PWT1D and PWOT1D, and characterize their PA-related behaviors using the ITHBC. Participants (N = 90; 86.7% female, 90% white) were recruited via social media and university listserv to complete an online questionnaire. Questions addressed demographics, anthropometrics, diabetes status, and PA-related behaviors. Participants were matched for race, gender, age, and body mass index. PA and related behaviors were compared between PWT1D and PWOT1D using independent samples t-tests and chi-square-tests. No significant differences were found between PWT1D and PWOT1D for weekly minutes of moderateor vigorous-aerobic PA, or weekly days of musclestrengthening PA (p > 0.05). Fifty-one percent of PWT1D and 53.3% of PWOT1D reported enough activity to meet PA guidelines. Almost twice as many PWT1D meeting PA guidelines reported using goal setting, a self-regulation behavior, compared to those who did not meet guidelines (82.6% versus 45.5%, p = 0.009). Targeting PA-related behaviors within ITHBC constructs may help reinforce or influence PA behaviors. These findings can inform future behavior change interventions with PWT1D that focus on educational practices for type 1 diabetes educators or healthcare providers for PWT1D so they can better aid patients.","PeriodicalId":73205,"journal":{"name":"Health behavior research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health behavior research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/2572-1836.1087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is a widely accepted strategy to manage chronic diseases like type 1 diabetes; however, unique PA barriers likely result in lower PA levels among person(s) with type 1 diabetes (PWT1D), compared to person(s) without type 1 diabetes (PWOT1D). The integrated theory of health behavior change (ITHBC) (i.e., knowledge/beliefs, self-regulation, and self-management) provides a helpful framework for understanding PA and other health behaviors. This research aimed to determine differences in PA between adult PWT1D and PWOT1D, and characterize their PA-related behaviors using the ITHBC. Participants (N = 90; 86.7% female, 90% white) were recruited via social media and university listserv to complete an online questionnaire. Questions addressed demographics, anthropometrics, diabetes status, and PA-related behaviors. Participants were matched for race, gender, age, and body mass index. PA and related behaviors were compared between PWT1D and PWOT1D using independent samples t-tests and chi-square-tests. No significant differences were found between PWT1D and PWOT1D for weekly minutes of moderateor vigorous-aerobic PA, or weekly days of musclestrengthening PA (p > 0.05). Fifty-one percent of PWT1D and 53.3% of PWOT1D reported enough activity to meet PA guidelines. Almost twice as many PWT1D meeting PA guidelines reported using goal setting, a self-regulation behavior, compared to those who did not meet guidelines (82.6% versus 45.5%, p = 0.009). Targeting PA-related behaviors within ITHBC constructs may help reinforce or influence PA behaviors. These findings can inform future behavior change interventions with PWT1D that focus on educational practices for type 1 diabetes educators or healthcare providers for PWT1D so they can better aid patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人1型糖尿病患者和非1型糖尿病患者身体活动行为的比较
身体活动(PA)是一种被广泛接受的管理1型糖尿病等慢性疾病的策略;然而,与非1型糖尿病(PWOT1D)患者相比,独特的PA障碍可能导致1型糖尿病(PWT1D)患者的PA水平较低。健康行为改变的综合理论(ITHBC)(即知识/信念、自我调节和自我管理)为理解个人行为和其他健康行为提供了有益的框架。本研究旨在确定成人PWT1D和PWOT1D之间PA的差异,并使用ITHBC表征其PA相关行为。参与者(N = 90;(86.7%为女性,90%为白人)通过社交媒体和大学通讯录被招募来完成一份在线问卷。问题涉及人口统计学、人体测量学、糖尿病状况和pa相关行为。参与者根据种族、性别、年龄和体重指数进行匹配。采用独立样本t检验和卡方检验比较PWT1D和PWOT1D的PA及相关行为。PWT1D和PWOT1D在每周中等高强度有氧PA分钟数或每周肌肉强化PA天数方面无显著差异(p < 0.05)。51%的PWT1D和53.3%的PWOT1D报告足够的活动满足PA指南。与不符合指南的PWT1D相比,几乎两倍的符合PA指南的PWT1D报告使用目标设定,一种自我调节行为(82.6%对45.5%,p = 0.009)。在ITHBC结构中定位PA相关行为可能有助于加强或影响PA行为。这些发现可以为未来的PWT1D行为改变干预提供信息,重点是对1型糖尿病教育者或PWT1D医疗保健提供者进行教育实践,以便他们能够更好地帮助患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The American Academy of Health Behavior 2024 Annual Scientific Meeting: "Health Communication, (Mis-)Information, and Behavior: Leveraging Technology for Behavioral Interventions and Health Behavior Research" Sapere Aude — Dare to Be Wise: Robert J. McDermott Impact of an Adaptive Worksite Diabetes Prevention Trial on Health Action Process Approach Outcomes Regarding Dietary Intake and Physical Activity. Community-Based Participatory Research to Promote Health Equity Among Sexual and Gender Minorities in the US South: Research Laureate Address. Examining the Relationship between Health Literacy and Preventive Care Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1